Suppr超能文献

与 Guglielmi 可脱性弹簧圈和目标弹簧圈电解脱离相关的血栓栓塞事件:与扩散加权磁共振成像的使用比较

Thromboembolic Events Associated with Electrolytic Detachment of Guglielmi Detachable Coils and Target Coils : Comparison with Use of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.

作者信息

Kim Myeong Jin, Lim Yong Cheol, Oh Se-Yang, Kim Byung Moon, Kim Bum-Soo, Shin Yong Sam

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013 Jul;54(1):19-24. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.54.1.19. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and compare the incidence of diffusion-weighted image (DWI) lesions between the Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) and the Target coil for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysm.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2011, consecutive 222 patients with an intracranial aneurysm underwent coil embolization. Inclusion criterias were : 1) unruptured intracranial aneurysm, 2) one or more GDC or Target coils used with or without other coils, 3) DWI examination within 24 hours after coiling, and 4) coiling performed without a balloon or stent.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (92 cases) met the inclusion criteria. DWI lesions were detected in 55 (61.1%) of 90 patients. In the GDC group (n=44), DWI lesions were detected in 31 (70.5%). The average number of DWI lesions was 5.0±8.7 (mean±SD; range, 1-40) in aneurysm-related territory. In the Target coil group (n=48), DWI lesions were detected in 24 (50.0%). The number of DWI lesion was 2.1±5.4 (range, 1-32) in aneurysm-related territory. There was no significant correlation between a number of coils and DWI lesions. No significant differences were also observed in the number of DWI lesions in each group.

CONCLUSION

The GDC and Target coils, which have an electrolytic detachable system, showed no differences in the incidence of DWI lesion.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性评估和比较 Guglielmi 可解脱弹簧圈(GDC)与 Target 弹簧圈治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤时扩散加权成像(DWI)病变的发生率。

方法

2010 年至 2011 年,连续 222 例颅内动脉瘤患者接受了弹簧圈栓塞治疗。纳入标准为:1)未破裂颅内动脉瘤;2)使用一个或多个 GDC 或 Target 弹簧圈,可联合或不联合其他弹簧圈;3)在弹簧圈栓塞后 24 小时内进行 DWI 检查;4)在无球囊或支架辅助下进行弹簧圈栓塞。

结果

90 例患者(92 个病例)符合纳入标准。90 例患者中有 55 例(61.1%)检测到 DWI 病变。在 GDC 组(n = 44)中,则有 31 例(70.5%)检测到 DWI 病变。在动脉瘤相关区域,DWI 病变的平均数量为 5.0±8.7(均值±标准差;范围为 1 - 40)。在 Target 弹簧圈组(n = 48)中,24 例(50.0%)检测到 DWI 病变。在动脉瘤相关区域,DWI 病变数量为 2.1±5.4(范围为 1 - 32)。弹簧圈数量与 DWI 病变之间无显著相关性。两组中 DWI 病变数量也未观察到显著差异。

结论

具有电解可解脱系统的 GDC 和 Target 弹簧圈在 DWI 病变发生率上无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bb/3772281/cf7d7e1970c0/jkns-54-19-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验