Flinders University of South Australia, GPO BOX 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Apr;44(4):758-65. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1927-3.
A number of changes were made to pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) in the recently released diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (APA, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA, 2013). Of the 210 participants in the present study who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for a PDD [i.e., autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS)], only 57.1% met DSM-5 criteria (specificity = 1.0) for autism spectrum disorder when criteria were applied concurrently during diagnostic assessment. High-functioning individuals (i.e., Asperger's disorder and PDD-NOS) were less likely to meet DSM-5 criteria than those with autistic disorder. A failure to satisfy all three criteria in the social-communication domain was the most common reason for exclusion (39%). The implications of these results are discussed.
在最近发布的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(APA,《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》,美国精神病学出版社,阿灵顿,弗吉尼亚州,2013 年)中,广泛性发育障碍(PDD)有了一些变化。在本研究的 210 名参与者中,符合 DSM-IV-TR 广泛性发育障碍标准[即自闭症障碍、阿斯伯格障碍和未特定广泛性发育障碍(PDD-NOS)]的人中,只有 57.1%符合 DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍标准(特异性=1.0),当在诊断评估中同时应用标准时。高功能个体(即阿斯伯格障碍和 PDD-NOS)比自闭症障碍患者更不可能符合 DSM-5 标准。社交沟通领域未能满足所有三个标准是最常见的排除原因(39%)。讨论了这些结果的含义。