Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia,
J Neurol. 2013 Dec;260(12):3039-48. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7116-7. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Vestibular rehabilitation programs do appear to play a beneficial role in the treatment of dizziness in patients with vestibular migraine. Anecdotally, however, patients with vestibular migraine may report persistent significant symptoms at the end of a standard treatment period where other non-migrainous patients are accomplishing their treatment goals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation in patients with vestibular migraine compared to patients with vestibular symptoms without migraine. Thirty-six patients (vestibular migraine = 20, vestibular impairment = 16) with significant daily vestibular symptoms received a nine week customized vestibular rehabilitation program. Each subject attended five therapy appointments occurring at initial, two, five, nine and six months. A range of subjective and physical performance outcome measures were taken at baseline, nine weeks and six months. The vestibular migraine group showed poorer subjective performance at the onset of therapy, which was not reflected in the difference in physical performance between the groups. Both groups benefitted equally from rehabilitation. The same degree of improvement was observed in the migraine group regardless of medication regime. This study has validated vestibular rehabilitation as an effective treatment in dizzy patients both with and without vestibular migraine where the use of medication did not preclude benefit from therapy. However, further research is required to clarify the role of specific vestibular suppressant medications and the scheduling of their use in relation to physical therapy.
前庭康复方案似乎在治疗前庭性偏头痛患者的头晕中发挥有益作用。然而,据传闻,在标准治疗期结束时,前庭性偏头痛患者可能会报告持续存在明显的症状,而其他非偏头痛患者则完成了他们的治疗目标。因此,本研究的目的是评估前庭康复在前庭性偏头痛患者与前庭症状无偏头痛患者中的疗效。36 名(前庭性偏头痛=20,前庭功能障碍=16)有明显日常前庭症状的患者接受了为期 9 周的定制前庭康复方案。每位患者在初始、第 2、第 5、第 9 和第 6 个月接受 5 次治疗预约。在基线、9 周和 6 个月时进行了一系列主观和身体表现的评估。在治疗开始时,前庭性偏头痛组的主观表现较差,而两组在身体表现方面没有差异。两组都从康复中受益。无论药物治疗方案如何,偏头痛组的改善程度相同。本研究验证了前庭康复在有或没有前庭性偏头痛的头晕患者中都是一种有效的治疗方法,药物的使用并不排除对治疗的益处。然而,需要进一步的研究来阐明特定的前庭抑制剂药物的作用及其与物理治疗的使用时间安排。