Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest/LaBRI Talence, France.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 17;7:568. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00568. eCollection 2013.
While recent research on Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) has highlighted their potential for many applications, they remain barely used outside laboratories. The main reason is their lack of robustness. Indeed, with current BCI, mental state recognition is usually slow and often incorrect. Spontaneous BCI (i.e., mental imagery-based BCI) often rely on mutual learning efforts by the user and the machine, with BCI users learning to produce stable ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG) patterns (spontaneous BCI control being widely acknowledged as a skill) while the computer learns to automatically recognize these EEG patterns, using signal processing. Most research so far was focused on signal processing, mostly neglecting the human in the loop. However, how well the user masters the BCI skill is also a key element explaining BCI robustness. Indeed, if the user is not able to produce stable and distinct EEG patterns, then no signal processing algorithm would be able to recognize them. Unfortunately, despite the importance of BCI training protocols, they have been scarcely studied so far, and used mostly unchanged for years. In this paper, we advocate that current human training approaches for spontaneous BCI are most likely inappropriate. We notably study instructional design literature in order to identify the key requirements and guidelines for a successful training procedure that promotes a good and efficient skill learning. This literature study highlights that current spontaneous BCI user training procedures satisfy very few of these requirements and hence are likely to be suboptimal. We therefore identify the flaws in BCI training protocols according to instructional design principles, at several levels: in the instructions provided to the user, in the tasks he/she has to perform, and in the feedback provided. For each level, we propose new research directions that are theoretically expected to address some of these flaws and to help users learn the BCI skill more efficiently.
尽管最近关于脑机接口 (BCI) 的研究强调了它们在许多应用中的潜力,但它们在实验室之外几乎没有得到应用。主要原因是它们缺乏稳健性。事实上,目前的 BCI 通常识别速度较慢,且识别结果常常不准确。基于自发性思维的 BCI(即基于心理意象的 BCI)通常依赖于用户和机器的共同学习,BCI 用户需要学习产生稳定的脑电图 (EEG) 模式(自发 BCI 控制被广泛认为是一种技能),而计算机则需要学习使用信号处理自动识别这些 EEG 模式。到目前为止,大多数研究都集中在信号处理上,而忽略了人在回路中的作用。然而,用户掌握 BCI 技能的程度也是解释 BCI 稳健性的关键因素之一。如果用户无法产生稳定且独特的 EEG 模式,那么任何信号处理算法都无法识别它们。不幸的是,尽管 BCI 训练协议很重要,但迄今为止它们几乎没有得到研究,并且多年来一直没有改变。在本文中,我们主张目前用于自发性 BCI 的人类训练方法很可能不合适。我们特别研究了教学设计文献,以确定成功培训程序的关键要求和指南,该培训程序可促进良好和高效的技能学习。这项文献研究强调,当前自发性 BCI 用户培训程序满足这些要求的很少,因此很可能不太理想。因此,我们根据教学设计原则,在几个层面上确定了 BCI 训练协议的缺陷:在向用户提供的说明中、在他们必须执行的任务中以及在提供的反馈中。对于每个级别,我们提出了新的研究方向,理论上预期这些研究方向可以解决其中一些缺陷,并帮助用户更有效地学习 BCI 技能。