Suppr超能文献

测量医院关怀文化的工具:系统综述。

Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments.

机构信息

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 23;3(9):e003416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003416.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify instruments or components of instruments that aim to measure aspects of a caring culture-shared beliefs, norms and values that direct professionals and managers to act caring in hospitals, and to evaluate their psychometric properties.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science and the International bibliography of the Social Sciences.

STUDY SELECTION

Peer-reviewed articles describing (components of) instruments measuring aspects of a caring culture in a hospital setting. Studies had to report psychometric data regarding the reliability or validity of the instrument. Potentially useful instruments that were identified after the title and abstract scan were assessed on relevance by an expert panel (n=12) using the RAND-modified Delphi procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 6399 references identified, 75 were examined in detail. 7 studies each covering a unique instrument met our inclusion criteria. On average, 24% of the instrument's items were considered relevant for measuring aspects of the hospital's caring culture. Studies showed moderate-to-high validity and reliability scores. Validity was addressed for 6 of the 7 instruments. Face, content (90%) and construct (60%) validity were the most frequently reported psychometric properties described. One study (14%) reported discriminant validity of the instrument. Reliability data were available for all of the instruments. Internal consistency was the most frequently reported psychometric property for the instruments and demonstrated by: a Cronbach's α coefficient (80%), subscale intercorrelations (60%), and item-total correlations (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ultimate standard for measuring a caring culture in hospitals does not exist. Existing instruments provide partial coverage and lack information on discriminant validity, responsiveness and feasibility. Characteristics of the instruments included in this review could provide useful input for the design of a reliable and valid instrument for measuring a caring culture in hospitals.

摘要

目的

确定旨在测量关怀文化方面的工具或工具组件-共享的信念、规范和价值观,这些信念、规范和价值观指导专业人员和管理人员在医院中表现出关怀,并评估其心理测量特性。

设计

系统评价。

资料来源

PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsychInfo、Web of Science 和国际社会科学文献目录。

研究选择

同行评议的文章,描述了在医院环境中测量关怀文化方面的(组件)工具。研究必须报告有关工具可靠性或有效性的心理测量学数据。在标题和摘要扫描后确定的潜在有用工具,由专家小组(n=12)使用 RAND 改良 Delphi 程序根据相关性进行评估。

结果

在确定的 6399 篇参考文献中,有 75 篇进行了详细检查。7 项研究各涵盖了一种独特的工具,符合我们的纳入标准。平均而言,24%的工具项目被认为与测量医院关怀文化方面有关。研究表明,这些工具具有中等到高度的有效性和可靠性评分。有 6 种工具的有效性得到了研究。描述的最常见的心理测量特性是表面、内容(90%)和结构(60%)有效性。有 1 项研究(14%)报告了该工具的判别有效性。所有工具都提供了可靠性数据。内部一致性是这些工具最常报告的心理测量特性,表现为:克朗巴赫α系数(80%)、分量表相互关系(60%)和项目总分相关(40%)。

结论

衡量医院关怀文化的最终标准并不存在。现有的工具提供了部分覆盖范围,缺乏有关判别有效性、反应性和可行性的信息。本综述中包含的工具的特点可以为设计用于测量医院关怀文化的可靠和有效的工具提供有用的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff9/3787470/1fe09d18ad91/bmjopen2013003416f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验