Sabri Bushra, Hong Jun Sung, Campbell Jacquelyn C, Cho Hyunkag
Johns Hopkins University, 511 N Washington Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Soc Serv Res. 2013 May 1;39(3):322-334. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2013.769835.
This article examines children and adolescent exposure to violence in various contexts. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the definitions and types of violence reported in studies on victimization using the ecological systems framework. Sources included research studies and/or reports from scholarly journals ( = 140), books ( = 9), conference/workshops ( = 5), and web sources, such as Uniform Crime Reports ( = 23). The findings indicated that research differed in terminologies, conceptual and operational definitions, sample sizes and age group classification for children and adolescents. Further, studies lacked focus on the co-occurrence and inter-relatedness of victimization, and how these factors might affect the outcomes. Many studies employed a cross-sectional design, which limits strong conclusions about the temporal order of victimization experiences and outcomes. Future research efforts need more consistency among researchers in conceptual and operational definitions and the use of more rigorous designs. Increased holistic assessments are critical for effective prevention and intervention strategies for at-risk children and adolescents.
本文探讨了儿童和青少年在各种环境中遭受暴力的情况。我们进行了一项文献系统综述,以利用生态系统框架确定受害研究中报告的暴力定义和类型。资料来源包括学术期刊的研究报告(=140)、书籍(=9)、会议/研讨会(=5)以及网络资源,如统一犯罪报告(=23)。研究结果表明,各项研究在术语、概念和操作定义、样本量以及儿童和青少年的年龄组分类方面存在差异。此外,研究缺乏对受害情况的同时发生和相互关联性以及这些因素如何影响结果的关注。许多研究采用横断面设计,这限制了我们对受害经历和结果的时间顺序得出强有力的结论。未来的研究工作需要研究人员在概念和操作定义上更加一致,并采用更严谨的设计。加强整体评估对于针对高危儿童和青少年的有效预防和干预策略至关重要。