Emory University.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;50(4):532-58. doi: 10.1177/1363461513502697.
The lack of culturally appropriate mental health assessment instruments is a major barrier to screening and evaluating efficacy of interventions. Simple translation of questionnaires produces misleading and inaccurate conclusions. Multiple alternate approaches have been proposed, and this study compared two approaches tested in rural Haiti. First, an established transcultural translation process was used to develop Haitian Kreyòl versions of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). This entailed focus group discussions evaluating comprehensibility, acceptability, relevance, and completeness. Second, qualitative data collection was employed to develop new instruments: the Kreyòl Distress Idioms (KDI) and Kreyòl Function Assessment (KFA) scales. For the BDI and BAI, some items were found to be nonequivalent due to lack of specificity, interpersonal interpretation, or conceptual nonequivalence. For all screening tools, items were adjusted if they were difficult to endorse or severely stigmatizing, represented somatic experiences of physical illness, or were difficult to understand. After the qualitative development phases, the BDI and BAI were piloted with 31 and 27 adults, respectively, and achieved good reliability. Without these efforts to develop appropriate tools, attempts at screening would have captured a combination of atypical suffering, everyday phenomena, and potential psychotic symptoms. Ultimately, a combination of transculturally adapted and locally developed instruments appropriately identified those in need of care through accounting for locally salient symptoms of distress and their negative sequelae.
缺乏文化适宜的心理健康评估工具是筛选和评估干预措施效果的主要障碍。简单地翻译问卷会产生误导性和不准确的结论。已经提出了多种替代方法,本研究比较了在海地农村地区测试的两种方法。首先,采用已建立的跨文化翻译过程来开发海地克里奥尔语版贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)。这需要进行焦点小组讨论,以评估可理解性、可接受性、相关性和完整性。其次,采用定性数据收集来开发新的工具:克里奥尔语痛苦习语(KDI)和克里奥尔语功能评估(KFA)量表。对于 BDI 和 BAI,由于缺乏特异性、人际解释或概念上的不等同,发现有些项目不等同。对于所有的筛查工具,如果项目难以认可或具有严重的污名化、代表身体疾病的躯体体验,或难以理解,则进行调整。在定性开发阶段之后,BDI 和 BAI 分别对 31 名和 27 名成年人进行了试点,均具有良好的可靠性。如果没有这些努力来开发适当的工具,那么尝试进行筛查可能会捕捉到非典型的痛苦、日常现象和潜在的精神病症状的组合。最终,通过考虑当地突出的痛苦症状及其负面后果,跨文化适应和本地开发的工具的组合可以适当地识别出需要护理的人群。