• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待-观察-停止:一种以患者为中心的 PRN 药物医嘱书写策略。

Take-Wait-Stop: a patient-centered strategy for writing PRN medication instructions.

机构信息

a Department of Emergency Medicine, and the Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine , Northwestern University , Chicago , Illinois , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):40-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825675.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2013.825675
PMID:24093344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3814925/
Abstract

Recent studies have linked patient misunderstanding of label instructions for as needed (PRN) medications to dosing errors. This study conducted a preliminary field test of patient-centered PRN label instructions. Patients participated in a hypothetical dosing experiment and were randomized to a patient-centered label (referred to as "Take-Wait-Stop") or standard label. Participants were asked to demonstrate dosing the medicine over 24 hours. Three types of independent dosing errors were measured: (a) taking more than two pills at one time, (b) exceeding the maximum daily dose, and (c) waiting fewer than 4 hours between doses. Generalized linear models were used to assess the association between label type, health literacy, and sociodemographic characteristics. Participants' mean age was 39.8 years, 62.1% were female, 43.7% were White, and 72.4% had adequate literacy. Of participants, 31.8% who were shown the standard label demonstrated taking in excess of 6 pills in 24 hours compared with only 14.0% of participants who were shown the Take-Wait-Stop label (p = .05). Overall, only 1 person demonstrated he would take more than 2 pills in a single dose. Of the standard label group, 20.5% demonstrated dosing intervals of fewer than 4 hours compared with 23.3% of the Take-Wait-Stop label group (p=.75). In a multivariate model, participants who were exposed to the standard label were 2.5 times more likely to exceed the recommended maximum daily dose (95% CI [1.05, 7.70], p=.03). The Take-Wait-Stop label was beneficial in preventing participants from exceeding the maximum dose in 24 hours, although it did not significantly reduce other dosing errors.

摘要

最近的研究将患者对按需(PRN)药物标签说明的误解与用药错误联系起来。本研究对以患者为中心的 PRN 标签说明进行了初步现场测试。患者参与了一个假设的给药实验,并被随机分配到以患者为中心的标签(称为“Take-Wait-Stop”)或标准标签。参与者被要求在 24 小时内演示给药。测量了三种独立的给药错误:(a)一次服用超过两片,(b)超过每日最大剂量,(c)两次服药之间等待时间少于 4 小时。使用广义线性模型评估标签类型、健康素养和社会人口统计学特征之间的关联。参与者的平均年龄为 39.8 岁,62.1%为女性,43.7%为白人,72.4%具有足够的读写能力。与展示标准标签的参与者相比,31.8%展示标准标签的参与者在 24 小时内服用超过 6 片的比例仅为 14.0%(p=0.05)。总体而言,只有 1 人表示他会单次服用超过 2 片。在标准标签组中,有 20.5%的人给药间隔少于 4 小时,而在 Take-Wait-Stop 标签组中,这一比例为 23.3%(p=0.75)。在多变量模型中,暴露于标准标签的参与者超过推荐最大每日剂量的可能性是 2.5 倍(95%CI[1.05,7.70],p=0.03)。虽然 Take-Wait-Stop 标签并没有显著减少其他剂量错误,但它有助于防止参与者在 24 小时内超过最大剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4b/3814925/2e0a2817ebfb/uhcm18_40_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4b/3814925/2e0a2817ebfb/uhcm18_40_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4b/3814925/2e0a2817ebfb/uhcm18_40_f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Take-Wait-Stop: a patient-centered strategy for writing PRN medication instructions.等待-观察-停止:一种以患者为中心的 PRN 药物医嘱书写策略。
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):40-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825675.
2
Implementation fidelity of patient-centered prescription label to promote opioid safe use.以患者为中心的处方标签的实施保真度,以促进阿片类药物的安全使用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):1251-1257. doi: 10.1002/pds.4795. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
A Patient-Centered Prescription Drug Label to Promote Appropriate Medication Use and Adherence.一份以患者为中心的处方药标签,以促进合理用药和依从性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1482-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3816-x. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
4
Use of a pictographic diagram to decrease parent dosing errors with infant acetaminophen: a health literacy perspective.使用象形图减少婴儿对乙酰氨基酚父母用药错误:从健康素养角度看。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.007.
5
Relation of Health Literacy to Exceeding the Labeled Maximum Daily Dose of Acetaminophen.健康素养与超过对乙酰氨基酚标签上标注的最大日剂量之间的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jun;50(6):e183-e190. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Misunderstanding and potential unintended misuse of acetaminophen among adolescents and young adults.青少年和年轻成年人中对乙酰氨基酚的误解和潜在的意外滥用。
J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):256-67. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604384.
7
Women's understanding of different dosing instructions for a liquid pediatric medication.女性对一种儿科液体药物不同剂量说明的理解。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2012 Nov-Dec;26(6):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
8
Evaluation of language concordant, patient-centered drug label instructions.评估语言一致、以患者为中心的药品标签说明。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1707-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2035-3. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
To err is human: patient misinterpretations of prescription drug label instructions.人非圣贤,孰能无过:患者对处方药标签说明的误解
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.024. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
10
Liquid Medication Dosing Errors by Hispanic Parents: Role of Health Literacy and English Proficiency.西班牙裔父母的液体药物给药错误:健康素养和英语水平的作用。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 May-Jun;17(4):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.10.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the design and structure of electronic medication labels to improve patient health knowledge and safety: a systematic review.评估电子用药标签的设计和结构以提高患者健康知识和安全性:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02413-z.
2
Evaluating Providers' Prescription Opioid Instructions to Pediatric Patients.评估医疗服务提供者对儿科患者的阿片类药物处方说明
Children (Basel). 2022 May 11;9(5):707. doi: 10.3390/children9050707.
3
Practical Considerations of PRN Medicines Management: An Integrative Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of unintentional overdose with non-prescription acetaminophen products.非处方对乙酰氨基酚产品误服过量的风险。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1587-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2096-3. Epub 2012 May 26.
2
What's in a label? An exploratory study of patient-centered drug instructions.标签里有什么?一项以患者为中心的药物说明书的探索性研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):777-82. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1169-2. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
3
Improving drug labeling and counseling for limited English proficient adults.改善对英语水平有限的成年人的药品标签及用药指导。
按需服用药物管理的实际考量:一项综合系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 12;13:759998. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.759998. eCollection 2022.
4
Strategies to optimize comprehension of numerical medication instructions: A systematic review and concept map.优化数值药物医嘱理解策略:系统评价与概念图
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):1888-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Developing and user testing new pharmacy label formats-A study to inform labelling standards.开发和用户测试新的药房标签格式——一项为标签标准提供信息的研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1125-1136. doi: 10.1111/hex.13203. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
The impact of textual elements on the comprehensibility of drug label instructions (DLIs): A systematic review.文本元素对药品标签说明书(DLIs)理解度的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0250238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250238. eCollection 2021.
7
Patient-Reported Opioid Pill Consumption After an ED Visit: How Many Pills Are People Using?急诊就诊后患者报告的阿片类药物丸剂使用量:人们使用了多少丸剂?
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 23;22(2):292-302. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa048.
8
A Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Patient Knowledge and Safe Use of Opioids: Results of the ED EMC Randomized Controlled Trial.一项多方面干预措施,以提高患者对阿片类药物的知识和安全使用:ED EMC 随机对照试验的结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(12):1311-1325. doi: 10.1111/acem.13860. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Parents' pain medication underdosing is associated with more emergency department visits in sickle cell disease.父母给患儿的止痛药剂量不足与镰状细胞病患儿更多的急诊就诊相关。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Apr;65(4). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26906. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy.方法学综述:健康素养方面随机对照试验的质量
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 11;16:246. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1479-2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Nov;22(4):1131-43. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0145.
4
Misunderstanding and potential unintended misuse of acetaminophen among adolescents and young adults.青少年和年轻成年人中对乙酰氨基酚的误解和潜在的意外滥用。
J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):256-67. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604384.
5
Developing consumer-centered, nonprescription drug labeling a study in acetaminophen.开发以消费者为中心的非处方药标签——对乙酰氨基酚的研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.016.
6
Helping patients simplify and safely use complex prescription regimens.帮助患者简化并安全使用复杂的处方治疗方案。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Feb 28;171(4):300-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.39.
7
Effect of standardized, patient-centered label instructions to improve comprehension of prescription drug use.标准化、以患者为中心的标签说明对提高处方药使用理解的效果。
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):96-100. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f38174.
8
Rationale and design of a randomized trial to evaluate an evidence-based prescription drug label on actual medication use.评价基于证据的处方药标签对实际用药影响的随机试验的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
9
Predictors of misunderstanding pediatric liquid medication instructions.儿童液体药物说明书误解的预测因素。
Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;41(10):715-21.
10
Pediatric fatalities associated with over the counter (nonprescription) cough and cold medications.与非处方止咳和感冒药相关的儿童死亡病例。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Dec 19.