Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and NUHS, Singapore, Singapore ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and NUHS, Singapore, Singapore.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e74410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074410. eCollection 2013.
Accurate assessment of insulin sensitivity may better identify individuals at increased risk of cardio-metabolic diseases.
To examine whether a combination of anthropometric, biochemical and imaging measures can better estimate insulin sensitivity index (ISI) and provide improved prediction of cardio-metabolic risk, in comparison to HOMA-IR.
Healthy male volunteers (96 Chinese, 80 Malay, 77 Indian), 21 to 40 years, body mass index 18-30 kg/m(2). Predicted ISI (ISI-cal) was generated using 45 randomly selected Chinese through stepwise multiple linear regression, and validated in the rest using non-parametric correlation (Kendall's tau τ). In an independent longitudinal cohort, ISI-cal and HOMA-IR were compared for prediction of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD), using ROC curves.
The study was conducted in a university academic medical centre.
ISI measured by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp, along with anthropometric measurements, biochemical assessment and imaging; incident diabetes and CVD.
A combination of fasting insulin, serum triglycerides and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) provided the best estimate of clamp-derived ISI (adjusted R(2) 0.58 versus 0.32 HOMA-IR). In an independent cohort, ROC areas under the curve were 0.77±0.02 ISI-cal versus 0.76±0.02 HOMA-IR (p>0.05) for incident diabetes, and 0.74±0.03 ISI-cal versus 0.61±0.03 HOMA-IR (p<0.001) for incident CVD. ISI-cal also had greater sensitivity than defined metabolic syndrome in predicting CVD, with a four-fold increase in the risk of CVD independent of metabolic syndrome.
Triglycerides and WHR, combined with fasting insulin levels, provide a better estimate of current insulin resistance state and improved identification of individuals with future risk of CVD, compared to HOMA-IR. This may be useful for estimating insulin sensitivity and cardio-metabolic risk in clinical and epidemiological settings.
准确评估胰岛素敏感性可以更好地识别出患有心血管代谢疾病风险增加的个体。
本研究旨在检验与 HOMA-IR 相比,结合人体测量学、生化和影像学指标是否能更好地估计胰岛素敏感指数(ISI)并改善对心血管代谢风险的预测。
本研究纳入了 96 名中国男性志愿者、80 名马来男性志愿者和 77 名印度男性志愿者,年龄在 21 至 40 岁之间,BMI 为 18-30kg/m2。通过逐步多元线性回归,从 45 名随机选择的中国人中生成预测的 ISI(ISI-cal),并通过非参数相关性(Kendall's tau τ)在其余人群中进行验证。在一个独立的纵向队列中,通过 ROC 曲线比较了 ISI-cal 和 HOMA-IR 对糖尿病和心血管疾病(CVD)的预测能力。
本研究在一所大学学术医学中心进行。
通过高胰岛素正葡萄糖钳夹技术测量的 ISI 与人体测量学指标、生化评估和影像学检查一起,空腹胰岛素、血清甘油三酯和腰臀比(WHR)可提供对钳夹衍生 ISI 的最佳估计(调整后的 R2 为 0.58 与 HOMA-IR 的 0.32 相比)。在一个独立的队列中,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.77±0.02 ISI-cal 与 0.76±0.02 HOMA-IR(p>0.05)用于预测糖尿病发病,0.74±0.03 ISI-cal 与 0.61±0.03 HOMA-IR(p<0.001)用于预测 CVD 发病。与代谢综合征相比,ISI-cal 对 CVD 的预测具有更高的敏感性,其 CVD 风险增加了四倍,与代谢综合征无关。
与 HOMA-IR 相比,空腹胰岛素水平与甘油三酯和 WHR 结合可更好地估计当前的胰岛素抵抗状态,并改善对 CVD 未来风险的识别。这可能有助于在临床和流行病学环境中估计胰岛素敏感性和心血管代谢风险。