Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
J Interpers Violence. 2014 Jan;29(2):237-54. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505149. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
This study examined cyberbullying among adolescents across United States and Singapore samples. Specifically, the purpose of the investigation was to study the differential associations between proactive and reactive aggression, and cyberbullying across two cultures. A total of 425 adolescents from the United States (M age = 13 years) and a total of 332 adolescents from Singapore (M age = 14.2 years) participated in the study. Results of the moderator analyses suggested that nationality was not a moderator of the relationship between proactive aggression and cyberbullying, and between reactive aggression and cyberbullying. As expected, findings showed proactive aggression to be positively associated with cyberbullying, after controlling for reactive aggression, across both samples. Likewise, as hypothesized, reactive aggression and cyberbullying was not found to be significant after controlling for proactive aggression across both samples. Implications of these findings were discussed: (a) Proactive aggression is a possible risk factor for both bullying and cyberbullying; (b) proactive and reactive aggression could be argued to be distinct as they have different correlates-only proactive aggression contributed to cyberbullying after controlling for reactive aggression; (c) this research extends previous work and contributes toward cross-cultural work using similar and comparable measures across different samples; and (d) prevention and intervention programs targeted at proactive aggressive adolescents could adopt a two-pronged approach by changing mind sets, and by understanding and adopting a set of rules for Internet etiquette.
本研究考察了美国和新加坡青少年群体中的网络欺凌现象。具体而言,该研究旨在探讨两种文化背景下,主动攻击和反应性攻击与网络欺凌之间的差异关联。共有 425 名来自美国的青少年(M 年龄=13 岁)和 332 名来自新加坡的青少年(M 年龄=14.2 岁)参与了这项研究。调节分析的结果表明,国籍不是主动攻击与网络欺凌之间、反应性攻击与网络欺凌之间关系的调节变量。正如预期的那样,在控制了反应性攻击后,发现来自两个样本的主动攻击与网络欺凌呈正相关。同样,正如假设的那样,在控制了两个样本中的主动攻击后,反应性攻击与网络欺凌之间没有发现显著相关性。这些发现的意义如下:(a) 主动攻击是欺凌和网络欺凌的一个可能的风险因素;(b) 主动攻击和反应性攻击可以被认为是不同的,因为它们有不同的相关性——只有在控制了反应性攻击后,主动攻击才与网络欺凌有关;(c) 这项研究扩展了以前的工作,并为使用类似和可比的措施在不同样本中进行跨文化研究做出了贡献;(d) 针对主动攻击型青少年的预防和干预计划可以采取双管齐下的方法,改变思维模式,并理解和采用一套互联网礼仪规则。