• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循环命名范式中决定语义促进和干扰的因素。

Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm.

作者信息

Navarrete Eduardo, Del Prato Paul, Mahon Bradford Z

机构信息

Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, University of Padova Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 21;3:38. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038
PMID:22363309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3283118/
Abstract

The cyclic naming paradigm, in which participants are slower to name pictures blocked by semantic category than pictures in an unrelated context, offers a window into the dynamics of the mapping between lexical concepts and words. Here we provide evidence for the view that incremental adjustments to the connection weights from semantics to lexical items provides an elegant explanation of a range of observations within the cyclic naming paradigm. Our principal experimental manipulation is to vary the within-category semantic distance among items that must be named together in a block. In the first set of experiments we find that naming latencies are, if anything, faster for within-category semantically close blocks compared to within-category semantically far blocks, for the first presentation of items. This effect can be explained by the fact that there will be more spreading activation, and thus greater priming at the lexical level, for within-category semantically close blocks than within-category semantically far blocks. We test this explanation by inserting intervening filler items (geometric shapes), and show as predicted, that while intervening unrelated trials abolish short-lived semantic priming effects, the long-lag interference effect that is characteristic of this paradigm is unaffected. These data place new constraints on explanations of the cyclic naming effect, and related phenomena, within a model of language production.

摘要

循环命名范式中,参与者对按语义类别分组的图片命名比对处于无关语境中的图片命名要慢,这为洞察词汇概念与单词之间映射的动态过程提供了一个窗口。在此,我们为以下观点提供证据:对从语义到词汇项的连接权重进行增量调整,为循环命名范式中的一系列观察结果提供了一个优雅的解释。我们主要的实验操作是改变在一个组块中必须一起命名的项目之间的类别内语义距离。在第一组实验中,我们发现,对于项目的首次呈现,与类别内语义距离远的组块相比,类别内语义距离近的组块的命名潜伏期(如果有差异的话)反而更快。这一效应可以用以下事实来解释:与类别内语义距离远的组块相比,类别内语义距离近的组块在词汇层面会有更多的扩散激活,从而有更强的启动效应。我们通过插入中间填充项目(几何形状)来检验这一解释,并如预期所示,表明虽然插入无关试验消除了短暂的语义启动效应,但该范式特有的长时滞后干扰效应不受影响。这些数据对语言产生模型中循环命名效应及相关现象的解释施加了新的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/4c22c577df59/fpsyg-03-00038-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/7847f005baa4/fpsyg-03-00038-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/3a31a9e910d1/fpsyg-03-00038-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/1bba1e5693d8/fpsyg-03-00038-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/85c7a0d4513a/fpsyg-03-00038-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/4c22c577df59/fpsyg-03-00038-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/7847f005baa4/fpsyg-03-00038-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/3a31a9e910d1/fpsyg-03-00038-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/1bba1e5693d8/fpsyg-03-00038-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/85c7a0d4513a/fpsyg-03-00038-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c28c/3283118/4c22c577df59/fpsyg-03-00038-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm.循环命名范式中决定语义促进和干扰的因素。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 21;3:38. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00038. eCollection 2012.
2
Lexical Retrieval is not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm.词汇检索并非通过竞争:来自受阻命名范式的证据。
J Mem Lang. 2014 Oct;76:253-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003.
3
Concurrent semantic priming and lexical interference for close semantic relations in blocked-cyclic picture naming: Electrophysiological signatures.在分块循环图片命名中,针对近义语义关系的并发语义启动和词汇干扰:电生理特征。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e13990. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13990. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.词汇选择并非通过竞争:对图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰和促进效应的重新诠释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):503-35. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
5
Strategic origins of early semantic facilitation in the blocked-cyclic naming paradigm.在分组循环命名范式中早期语义促进的策略起源。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1659-1668. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000399. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
6
Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.特征重叠会减缓词汇选择:来自图词干扰范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(12):2325-39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.923922. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
7
A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.一种用于研究语言产生中语义语境效应的新的多词范式。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230439. eCollection 2020.
8
Cumulative semantic cost without successful naming.无成功命名的累积语义成本。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1348-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Long-term interference at the semantic level: Evidence from blocked-cyclic picture matching.语义层面的长期干扰:来自分组循环图片匹配的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):149-57. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000164. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
A joint investigation of semantic facilitation and semantic interference in continuous naming.连续命名中语义促进和语义干扰的联合调查。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 May;43(5):818-823. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000354. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive lexical processing of semantic competitors extends to alternative names: Evidence from blocked-cyclic picture naming.语义竞争者的适应性词汇加工扩展至别名:来自阻断循环图片命名的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Apr;78(4):672-684. doi: 10.1177/17470218241245107. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Effortful Retrieval Practice Effects in Lexical Access: A Role for Semantic Competition.词汇提取中努力检索练习的效果:语义竞争的作用。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(8):948-963. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2027991. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Orthography influences spoken word production in blocked cyclic naming.

本文引用的文献

1
The dynamic microstructure of speech production: semantic interference built on the fly.言语产生的动态微观结构:即时构建的语义干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):149-61. doi: 10.1037/a0021208.
2
The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.累积语义成本并不反映竞争导致的词汇选择。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
3
On the origin of the "cumulative semantic inhibition" effect.关于“累积语义抑制”效应的起源。
正字法在分组循环命名中影响口语单词的生成。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):383-392. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02123-y. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
4
A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.一种用于研究语言产生中语义语境效应的新的多词范式。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230439. eCollection 2020.
5
Semantic Processing in Bilingual Aphasia: Evidence of Language Dependency.双语失语症中的语义加工:语言依赖性证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 14;13:205. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00205. eCollection 2019.
6
Semantic interference in speech error production in a randomized continuous naming task: Evidence from aphasia.随机连续命名任务中言语错误产生的语义干扰:来自失语症的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(1):69-86. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1501500. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
Effects of Bilingualism on Verbal and Nonverbal Memory Measures in Mild Cognitive Impairment.双语对轻度认知障碍的言语和非言语记忆测量的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jan;25(1):15-28. doi: 10.1017/S135561771800070X. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
8
Interactions between Lexical Access and Articulation.词汇通达与发音之间的相互作用。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33(1):12-24. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1348529. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.左侧前额叶外侧皮质的损伤会损害词汇选择的决策阈值调整。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017 Feb-Mar;34(1-2):1-20. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1282447. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Modelling lexical access in speech production as a ballistic process.将言语产生中的词汇通达建模为一个弹道过程。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(4):521-523. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1129060. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):57-66. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.57.
4
The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech.口语时事件相关脑电位揭示的单词提取时间进程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21442-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
5
The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production.增量学习的阴暗面:言语产生中词汇通达过程中累积语义干扰的模型。
Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):227-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
6
Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream.与动作相关的属性塑造了腹侧视觉通路中的物体表征。
Neuron. 2007 Aug 2;55(3):507-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.011.
7
When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production.当蜜蜂妨碍蜂蜜生产时:言语产生中来自联想词的词汇干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):604-14. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.604.
8
Now you see it, now you don't: on turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task.现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了:在类似斯特鲁普任务中把语义干扰转化为促进作用。
Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):790-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70419-2.
9
Semantic priming over unrelated trials: evidence for different effects in word and picture naming.无关试验中的语义启动:单词和图片命名中不同效应的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):715-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03193590.
10
Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies.图片命名中的累积语义抑制:实验与计算研究
Cognition. 2006 Jul;100(3):464-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006. Epub 2006 Jan 17.