Williamson J M, Chalmers D M, Clayden A D, Dixon M F, Ruddell W S, Losowsky M S
J Clin Pathol. 1985 Sep;38(9):1007-12. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.9.1007.
Seventy four liver biopsies from 59 patients were reviewed by two observers and histologically graded in the absence of clinical information, firstly, to assess the level of agreement with previous diagnoses; secondly, to identify differences between primary biliary cirrhosis and chronic active hepatitis; and, thirdly, to assess the specificity of Shikata orcein staining and antimitochondrial antibody positivity and titre for primary biliary cirrhosis. Thirty six patients with adequate histology were initially selected as typical of primary biliary cirrhosis or chronic active hepatitis; agreement both between observers and with original diagnoses was reached in 26 (72%) (15 with primary biliary cirrhosis (group 1), 11 with chronic active hepatitis (group 2)). In 19 diagnostically difficult patients in whom clinical and original histological findings had been at variance, histological agreement between observers was reached in 17 (group 3) and original underdiagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis was suggested. The main clinical and histological differences between groups 1 and 2 are discussed in this paper. Although a high grade of positivity for copper associated protein in the Shikata orcein stain was seen only in primary biliary cirrhosis, a high titre of antimitochondrial antibody positivity was not unique to this condition.
两名观察者对来自59名患者的74份肝活检样本进行了检查,并在无临床信息的情况下进行了组织学分级,目的如下:第一,评估与先前诊断的一致程度;第二,鉴别原发性胆汁性肝硬化与慢性活动性肝炎之间的差异;第三,评估用于原发性胆汁性肝硬化的石胆酸染色及抗线粒体抗体阳性和滴度的特异性。最初选取了36名组织学表现充分的患者作为原发性胆汁性肝硬化或慢性活动性肝炎的典型病例;观察者之间以及与原始诊断之间的一致性在26例(72%)中达成(15例原发性胆汁性肝硬化(第1组),11例慢性活动性肝炎(第2组))。在19例临床和原始组织学结果存在差异、诊断困难的患者中,观察者之间的组织学一致性在17例中达成(第3组),提示原发性胆汁性肝硬化存在原始诊断不足的情况。本文讨论了第1组和第2组之间主要的临床和组织学差异。虽然仅在原发性胆汁性肝硬化中观察到石胆酸染色中铜相关蛋白的高阳性率,但抗线粒体抗体高滴度阳性并非该疾病所特有。