• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科医生在小儿镇静程序中使用异丙酚的安全性和疗效。

Safety and efficacy of propofol administered by paediatricians during procedural sedation in children.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr. 2014 Feb;103(2):182-7. doi: 10.1111/apa.12472. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1111/apa.12472
PMID:24138461
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the safety and the efficacy of paediatrician-administered propofol in children undergoing different painful procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study over a 12-year period in three Italian hospitals. A specific training protocol was developed in each institution to train paediatricians administering propofol for painful procedures.

RESULTS

In this study, 36,516 procedural sedations were performed. Deep sedation was achieved in all patients. None of the children experienced severe side effects or prolonged hospitalisation. There were six calls to the emergency team (0.02%): three for prolonged laryngospasm, one for bleeding, one for intestinal perforation and one during lumbar puncture. Nineteen patients (0.05%) developed hypotension requiring saline solution administration, 128 children (0.4%) needed O2 ventilation by face mask, mainly during upper endoscopy, 78 (0.2%) patients experienced laryngospasm, and 15 (0.04%) had bronchospasm. There were no differences in the incidence of major complications among the three hospitals, while minor complications were higher in children undergoing gastroscopy.

CONCLUSION

This multicentre study demonstrates the safety and the efficacy of paediatrician-administered propofol for procedural sedation in children and highlights the importance of appropriate training for paediatricians to increase the safety of this procedure in children.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定儿科医生在为接受不同疼痛程序的儿童管理异丙酚的安全性和疗效。

方法

我们在意大利的三家医院进行了为期 12 年的回顾性研究。在每家机构都制定了专门的培训方案,以培训管理异丙酚用于疼痛程序的儿科医生。

结果

在这项研究中,共进行了 36516 次程序性镇静。所有患者均达到深度镇静。没有患儿出现严重的副作用或延长住院时间。有 6 次呼叫急救团队(0.02%):3 次为长时间的喉痉挛,1 次为出血,1 次为肠穿孔,1 次为腰椎穿刺。19 名患者(0.05%)出现低血压,需要给予生理盐水,128 名儿童(0.4%)需要通过面罩吸氧,主要是在进行上内窥镜检查时,78 名患者(0.2%)出现喉痉挛,15 名(0.04%)出现支气管痉挛。在这三家医院中,主要并发症的发生率没有差异,而在接受胃镜检查的儿童中,轻微并发症较高。

结论

这项多中心研究表明,儿科医生管理异丙酚用于儿童程序性镇静是安全有效的,并强调了为儿科医生提供适当培训以提高该程序在儿童中的安全性的重要性。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of propofol administered by paediatricians during procedural sedation in children.儿科医生在小儿镇静程序中使用异丙酚的安全性和疗效。
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Feb;103(2):182-7. doi: 10.1111/apa.12472. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
2
Deep sedation with propofol by nonanesthesiologists: a prospective pediatric experience.非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚进行深度镇静:一项前瞻性儿科研究经验。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1097-103. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1097.
3
Deep sedation with propofol for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children, administered by specially trained pediatricians: a prospective case series with emphasis on side effects.由经过专门培训的儿科医生使用丙泊酚对儿童进行上消化道内镜检查时进行深度镇静:一项侧重于副作用的前瞻性病例系列研究。
Endoscopy. 2006 Apr;38(4):368-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921194.
4
Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists without assisted ventilation for long cardiac interventions: an assessment of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.心内科医生在无辅助通气情况下对行长时间心脏介入术患者使用异丙酚镇静:1000 例接受房颤消融术患者的评估。
Europace. 2012 Mar;14(3):325-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur328. Epub 2011 Oct 23.
5
Pediatric procedural sedation by a dedicated nonanesthesiology pediatric sedation service using propofol.由专门的非麻醉科儿科镇静服务团队使用丙泊酚进行儿科操作镇静。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Mar;25(3):133-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31819a7f75.
6
Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children.脑电双频指数作为儿童程序性镇静期间丙泊酚滴定的指导指标。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1666-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979.
7
The safety of propofol sedation for elective nonintubated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients.丙泊酚镇静用于小儿择期非插管食管胃十二指肠镜检查的安全性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):e261-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000147.
8
Procedural sedation with propofol: a retrospective review of the experiences of an emergency medicine residency program 2005 to 2010.异丙酚镇静的程序:2005 年至 2010 年急诊住院医师培训项目的经验回顾。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures.在高级内镜检查过程中使用丙泊酚时镇静相关并发症的发生率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;8(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
10
Propofol for procedural sedation in children in the emergency department.丙泊酚用于急诊科儿童程序性镇静。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Dec;42(6):773-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00619-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Median effective dose (ED) of esketamine combined with propofol for children to inhibit response of gastroscope insertion.依托咪酯复合氯胺酮用于小儿胃镜检查中抑制反应的半数有效剂量(ED)。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02204-y.
2
Safety of deep intravenous propofol sedation in the dental treatment of children in the outpatient department.门诊儿童牙科治疗中深部静脉注射丙泊酚镇静的安全性
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jul;18(3):1073-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
The Efficacy and Complications of Deep Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
小儿牙科患者深度镇静的疗效与并发症:一项回顾性队列研究
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2022 Jun 22;2022:5259283. doi: 10.1155/2022/5259283. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of Ketamine and Propofol-Based Regimens for Deep Sedation in Children Undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.氯胺酮与丙泊酚方案用于接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查的儿童深度镇静的比较
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 23;11(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721657. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Can ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block be an alternative option for forearm reduction in the emergency department? A prospective randomized study.超声引导下锁骨下阻滞能否作为急诊科前臂复位的替代选择?一项前瞻性随机研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;8(4):307-313. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.136. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
6
Stability data of extemporaneous oral suspension of pentobarbital in Syrspend SF Alka for imaging sedation procedure.用于影像镇静程序的戊巴比妥在Syrspend SF Alka中的临时口服混悬液稳定性数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Feb 17;35:106884. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106884. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
The development of a Consensus Conference on Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department in Italy: from here where to?意大利急诊儿科操作镇静共识会议的发展:从这里走向何方?
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 May 1;46(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0812-x.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Pediatric Oncology Patients.小儿肿瘤患者程序性镇静与镇痛的安全性和有效性
Cureus. 2020 Mar 28;12(3):e7442. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7442.
9
Analgosedation for diagnostic and interventional procedures: a countrywide survey of pediatric centers in Germany.诊断和介入操作的镇静镇痛:德国儿科中心的全国性调查。
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Feb 3;46(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0783-y.
10
Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review.丙泊酚在新生儿和儿童中的应用:安全吗?系统评价。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 May-Jun;96(3):289-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.08.011. Epub 2020 Jan 8.