Marks I M, Hodgson R, Rachman S
Br J Psychiatry. 1975 Oct;127:349-64. doi: 10.1192/bjp.127.4.349.
Twenty patients with chronic obsessive-compulsive rituals were treated in a partially controlled design by in-vivo (real life) exposure with self-imposed response prevention. Treatment included 4-12 weeks as in-patients, and lasted a mean of 23 sessions. All patients were followed-up for at least two years. No patients dropped out during the trial, though one refused domiciliary treatment after discharge. Significant improvement in compulsions was found after three weeks of real-life exposure, and continued during follow-up. At two years follow-up 14 patients were much improved, one improved and 5 unchanged; in a third year of follow-up the improved patient became symptom-free after further exposure treatment. Improvement after three weeks exposure predicted good outcome at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Muscular relaxation treatment had no significant effect on rituals. Modelling of exposure conferred no advantage over exposure alone for the group as a whole, though it may help selected patients. The role of response prevention is unknown. Patients' commitment to treatment facilitates exposure. Domiciliary treatment with involvement of family members in therapy seems crucial in some cases. Pilot group treatment of patients and families together suggests that this may be a useful adjuvant to individual treatment by increasing motivation and aiding follow-up. Compulsive slowness presents special treatment problems but can be improved by a prompting and pacing approach. The course of rituals was often independent of that of agoraphobia, marital problems and depression where these had initially coexisted with rituals. Depressive episodes were common before, during and after treatment, and required tricyclic medication. The trial sample was predominantly female but was otherwise typical of patients with compulsive rituals. Of the 125 obsessive-compulsives seen in the first author's unit over four years 96 per cent were offered behavioural or anti-depressant treatment. One quarter refused behavioural treatment after it was offered. Real-life exposure with self-imposed response prevention is usually an effective procedure for lasting reduction of chronic compulsive rituals in well motivated patients.
20名患有慢性强迫仪式行为的患者接受了部分对照设计的治疗,采用现实生活暴露并自我实施反应阻止法。治疗包括住院4至12周,平均持续23次治疗。所有患者均接受了至少两年的随访。试验期间无患者退出,不过有1名患者出院后拒绝接受家庭治疗。现实生活暴露3周后,强迫症状有显著改善,并在随访期间持续。随访两年时,14名患者明显改善,1名有所改善,5名无变化;在随访的第三年,那名有所改善的患者在进一步接受暴露治疗后症状消失。暴露3周后的改善情况预示着在6个月和12个月随访时会有良好的结果。肌肉放松治疗对仪式行为没有显著影响。对于整个组而言,暴露示范相较于单纯暴露并无优势,不过它可能对部分患者有帮助。反应阻止的作用尚不清楚。患者对治疗的投入有助于暴露治疗。在某些情况下,让家庭成员参与治疗的家庭治疗似乎至关重要。对患者及其家庭进行试点小组治疗表明,这可能是个体治疗的有用辅助手段,可增强动机并有助于随访。强迫性迟缓带来特殊的治疗问题,但可通过提示和节奏控制方法得到改善。仪式行为的病程通常与广场恐惧症、婚姻问题和抑郁症无关,尽管这些问题最初可能与仪式行为并存。抑郁发作在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后都很常见,需要使用三环类药物治疗。试验样本主要为女性,但在其他方面是强迫仪式行为患者的典型代表。在第一作者所在科室四年间诊治的125名强迫症患者中,96%接受了行为治疗或抗抑郁治疗。四分之一的患者在提供行为治疗后拒绝接受。对于积极性高的患者,现实生活暴露并自我实施反应阻止法通常是持久减少慢性强迫仪式行为的有效方法。