• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 mywellness key 在步行和跑步速度方面的有效性。

Validation of the mywellness key in walking and running speeds.

机构信息

Sports Medicine Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova , Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Mar 1;11(1):57-63. eCollection 2012.

PMID:24149122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3737851/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study was performed to assess the validity of the MyWellness Key (MWK) accelerometer during a treadmill-based protocol. The identification of different exercise intensities is imperative to objectively measure time spent at a specified exercise intensity. Thirty subjects, 15 men and 15 women (age = 24.5 ± 2.6 years; body mass index = 22.5 ± 2.5 kg·m(-1)), participated in a 4-phase treadmill protocol (5 minutes each one) using three different walking velocities (3, 4.5, and 6 km·h(-1)) and run (8 km·h(-1)) while outfitted with a MWK uniaxial accelerometer. Oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry (ICVO2).

RESULTS

The relationship between VO2 predicted from MWK (MWKVO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2 (ICVO2)), yielded a high and significant correlation (r = 0. 944; p < 0.001) with standard error of estimate (SEE) = 2.42 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1). The average differences between the two methods (MWKVO2 - ICVO2) were -0.79 (-8. 8% at 3 km·h(-1)), -0.02 (-0.2% at 4.5 km·h(-1)), 0.51 (3.3% at 6 km·h(-1)) and -0.74 (-2.7% at 8 km·h(-1)) ml·kg(-1)·min(-1). Only the 3 km·h(-1) speed showed a difference when compared to the criterion measure (p < 0.001). Bland and Altman analysis revealed less than a 1 MET difference in the mean at each point estimate and relatively tight distribution with the standard errors, especially with the 2 moderate walking speeds.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high correlation between oxygen utilization and the MWK with low standard errors estimates. This indicates that this accelerometer can be used to identify exercise intensities that are related to walking and running. Key pointsFirst laboratory validation of a new uniaxial accelerometer, the MyWellness Key.Results indicate a good exercise intensity prediction during walking at moderate to high speeds.Comparing with other laboratory validations, MyWellness Key exercise intensity detection is aligned with other accelerometers.MyWellness Key can be used to give valid measurements for a range of ambulatory activity in addition to the capabilities to give real-time feedback to the participant in health promotion studies.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 MyWellness Key(MWK)加速度计在跑步机测试方案中的有效性。为了客观地测量特定运动强度下的时间,识别不同的运动强度至关重要。30 名受试者,15 名男性和 15 名女性(年龄=24.5±2.6 岁;体重指数=22.5±2.5kg·m(-1)),使用三种不同的步行速度(3、4.5 和 6km·h(-1)) 和跑步(8km·h(-1))进行了 4 个阶段的跑步机测试(每个阶段 5 分钟),同时配备了 MWK 单轴加速度计。通过间接测热法(ICVO2)测量耗氧量。

结果

MWK 预测的 VO2(MWKVO2)与耗氧量(VO2(ICVO2))之间的关系具有高度显著的相关性(r=0.944;p<0.001),估计标准误差(SEE)=2.42ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)。两种方法(MWKVO2-ICVO2)的平均差异为-0.79(在 3km·h(-1)下为-8.8%),-0.02(在 4.5km·h(-1)下为-0.2%),0.51(在 6km·h(-1)下为 3.3%)和-0.74(在 8km·h(-1)下为-2.7%)ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)。只有 3km·h(-1)的速度与标准测量值存在差异(p<0.001)。Bland 和 Altman 分析显示,在每个点估计的平均误差中,差异小于 1MET,且分布较为紧密,尤其是在 2 个中等步行速度下。

结论

我们发现耗氧量与 MWK 之间具有高度相关性,且估计标准误差较低。这表明该加速度计可用于识别与步行和跑步相关的运动强度。关键点:

  • 首次对新型单轴加速度计 MyWellness Key 进行实验室验证。

  • 结果表明,在中高速步行时,对运动强度的预测较好。

  • 与其他实验室验证相比,MyWellness Key 的运动强度检测与其他加速度计一致。

  • MyWellness Key 除了能够对各种日常活动进行有效的测量外,还可以为健康促进研究中的参与者提供实时反馈。

相似文献

1
Validation of the mywellness key in walking and running speeds.验证 mywellness key 在步行和跑步速度方面的有效性。
J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Mar 1;11(1):57-63. eCollection 2012.
2
Reliability and validity of the Mywellness Key physical activity monitor.Mywellness Key 体力活动监测器的信度和效度。
Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:13-20. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S38370. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
3
Assessment of the MyWellness Key accelerometer in people with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中MyWellness Key加速度计的评估。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Nov;40(11):1193-8. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0169. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
4
Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer.MyWellness Key 加速度计评估。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;45(2):109-13. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
5
Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.Fitbit One、佳明Vivofit和Jawbone UP活动追踪器在估算跑步机行走和跑步过程中的能量消耗方面的验证。
J Med Eng Technol. 2017 Apr;41(3):208-215. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1253795. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Performance of Different Accelerometry-Based Metrics to Estimate Oxygen Consumption during Track and Treadmill Locomotion over a Wide Intensity Range.不同基于加速度计的指标在广泛强度范围内估计跑步和跑步机运动时耗氧量的性能。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 25;23(11):5073. doi: 10.3390/s23115073.
7
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.腕戴式活动追踪器在慢性疼痛患者的实验室和自由生活环境中的应用:效标效度研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):e24806. doi: 10.2196/24806.
8
Validity of treadmill- and track-based individual calibration methods for estimating free-living walking speed and VO2 using the Actigraph accelerometer.基于跑步机和跑道的个体校准方法在使用Actigraph加速度计估算日常步行速度和摄氧量方面的有效性。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov 25;7:29. doi: 10.1186/s13102-015-0024-7. eCollection 2015.
9
Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.Tritrac加速度计作为身体活动测量工具的效度、信度和校准。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jun;31(6):908-12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00022.
10
Estimation of oxygen uptake during fast running using accelerometry and heart rate.使用加速度计和心率估算快速跑步时的摄氧量。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jan;39(1):192-8. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000235884.71487.21.

引用本文的文献

1
Multimodal Exercise Effects in Older Adults Depend on Sleep, Movement Biography, and Habitual Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.多模式运动对老年人的影响取决于睡眠、运动经历和习惯性身体活动:一项随机对照试验。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Oct 22;13:722799. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.722799. eCollection 2021.
2
Habitual Physical Activity and Sleep Duration in Institutionalized Older Adults.机构养老老年人的习惯性身体活动与睡眠时间
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 27;12:706340. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.706340. eCollection 2021.
3
Three Months Monitored Metabolic Fitness Modulates Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Diabetic Patients.三个月监测代谢健康可调节糖尿病患者的心血管危险因素。
Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Dec;43(6):893-897. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0254. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the use of Physical ACtivity monitors in an Exercise Referral Setting: the PACERS study.在运动转诊环境中使用身体活动监测器的可行性随机对照试验方案:PACERS研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Dec 12;3:51. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0194-z. eCollection 2017.
5
Level and correlates of physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional analysis of the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study_2.2型糖尿病患者身体活动和久坐行为的水平及其相关因素:意大利糖尿病与运动研究_2的横断面分析
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 14;12(3):e0173337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173337. eCollection 2017.
6
Devices for Self-Monitoring Sedentary Time or Physical Activity: A Scoping Review.久坐时间或身体活动自我监测设备:一项范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 4;18(5):e90. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5373.
7
The Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study 2 (IDES-2): a long-term behavioral intervention for adoption and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle.意大利糖尿病与运动研究2(IDES-2):一项关于采用和维持积极身体活动生活方式的长期行为干预研究。
Trials. 2015 Dec 11;16:569. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1088-0.
8
Reliability and validity of the Mywellness Key physical activity monitor.Mywellness Key 体力活动监测器的信度和效度。
Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:13-20. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S38370. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of the Caltrac Accelerometer in Estimating Energy Expenditure and Activity in Children and Adults.
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1991 May;3(2):141-151. doi: 10.1123/pes.3.2.141.
2
Equating accelerometer estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: in search of the Rosetta Stone.将加速度计估计的中等到剧烈身体活动进行等同化:寻找罗塞塔石碑。
J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Sep;14(5):404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
3
Validation of the actical activity monitor in middle-aged and older adults.中老年人活动监测仪的验证。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Mar;8(3):372-81. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.3.372.
4
Validity of the Actical for estimating free-living physical activity.Actical 在估计自由生活体力活动中的有效性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Jul;111(7):1381-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1758-2. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
5
Validity of Physical Activity Monitors in Assessing Energy Expenditure in Normal, Overweight, and Obese Adults.身体活动监测器在评估正常、超重及肥胖成年人能量消耗方面的有效性
Open Sports Sci J. 2009;2:58-64. doi: 10.2174/1875399X00902010058.
6
Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer.MyWellness Key 加速度计评估。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;45(2):109-13. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
7
Review of physical activity measurement using accelerometers in older adults: considerations for research design and conduct.老年人使用加速度计进行身体活动测量的综述:研究设计与实施的考量
Prev Med. 2009 Feb;48(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
8
Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults.Kenz Lifecorder EX和ActiGraph GT1M加速度计在成年人步行和跑步中的有效性验证。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Dec;33(6):1155-64. doi: 10.1139/h08-103.
9
A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure.一种利用加速度计数据预测能量消耗的新方法。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Apr;100(4):1324-31. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2005. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
10
Calibration of accelerometer output for children.儿童加速度计输出的校准
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S523-30. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185658.28284.ba.