Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick , Ireland.
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Jun 1;12(2):298-308. eCollection 2013.
Exploring the effects of fatigue on skilled performance in tennis presents a significant challenge to the researcher with respect to ecological validity. This study examined the effects of moderate and high-intensity fatigue on groundstroke accuracy in expert and non-expert tennis players. The research also explored whether the effects of fatigue are the same regardless of gender and player's achievement motivation characteristics. 13 expert (7 male, 6 female) and 17 non-expert (13 male, 4 female) tennis players participated in the study. Groundstroke accuracy was assessed using the modified Loughborough Tennis Skills Test. Fatigue was induced using the Loughborough Intermittent Tennis Test with moderate (70%) and high-intensities (90%) set as a percentage of peak heart rate (attained during a tennis-specific maximal hitting sprint test). Ratings of perceived exertion were used as an adjunct to the monitoring of heart rate. Achievement goal indicators for each player were assessed using the 2 x 2 Achievement Goals Questionnaire for Sport in an effort to examine if this personality characteristic provides insight into how players perform under moderate and high-intensity fatigue conditions. A series of mixed ANOVA's revealed significant fatigue effects on groundstroke accuracy regardless of expertise. The expert players however, maintained better groundstroke accuracy across all conditions compared to the novice players. Nevertheless, in both groups, performance following high-intensity fatigue deteriorated compared to performance at rest and performance while moderately fatigued. Groundstroke accuracy under moderate levels of fatigue was equivalent to that at rest. Fatigue effects were also similar regardless of gender. No fatigue by expertise, or fatigue by gender interactions were found. Fatigue effects were also equivalent regardless of player's achievement goal indicators. Future research is required to explore the effects of fatigue on performance in tennis using ecologically valid designs that mimic more closely the demands of match play. Key PointsGroundstroke accuracy under moderate-intensity fatigue is equivalent to performance at rest.Groundstroke accuracy declines significantly in both expert (40.3% decline) and non-expert (49.6%) tennis players following high-intensity fatigue.Expert players are more consistent, hit more accurate shots and fewer out shots across all fatigue intensities.The effects of fatigue on groundstroke accuracy are the same regardless of gender and player's achievement goal indicators.
探讨疲劳对网球技能表现的影响对研究人员来说是一个巨大的挑战,因为这涉及到生态有效性。本研究考察了中度和高强度疲劳对专家和非专家网球运动员正手击球准确性的影响。此外,本研究还探讨了疲劳的影响是否因性别和运动员的成就动机特征的不同而不同。13 名专家(7 男,6 女)和 17 名非专家(13 男,4 女)网球运动员参与了本研究。正手击球准确性使用改良后的拉夫堡网球技能测试进行评估。疲劳通过 Loughborough 间歇性网球测试诱发,中等强度(70%)和高强度(90%)分别设定为最大心率(在特定网球最大击球冲刺测试中达到)的百分比。感知用力程度被用作心率监测的辅助手段。使用 2×2 运动成就目标问卷评估每个运动员的成就目标指标,以考察这种人格特征是否能深入了解运动员在中度和高强度疲劳条件下的表现。一系列混合方差分析显示,无论专业水平如何,疲劳对正手击球准确性都有显著影响。然而,与新手运动员相比,专家运动员在所有条件下都能保持更好的正手击球准确性。尽管如此,在两组运动员中,高强度疲劳后表现都比休息时和中度疲劳时更差。中度疲劳下的正手击球准确性与休息时相当。无论性别如何,疲劳效应也相似。没有发现疲劳与专业水平之间,或疲劳与性别之间的相互作用。无论运动员的成就目标指标如何,疲劳效应都是等效的。未来的研究需要使用更接近比赛要求的生态有效设计来探索疲劳对网球运动表现的影响。关键点中度疲劳下的正手击球准确性与休息时相当。高强度疲劳后,专家(40.3%下降)和非专家(49.6%)网球运动员的正手击球准确性显著下降。在所有疲劳强度下,专家运动员更稳定,击球更准确,失误更少。疲劳对正手击球准确性的影响不受性别和运动员成就目标指标的影响。