Suppr超能文献

通过对主要成分的表征和测定,对印度传统的附子净化方法与中国的炮制方法进行比较研究。

A comparative study on the traditional Indian Shodhana and Chinese processing methods for aconite roots by characterization and determination of the major components.

作者信息

Jaiswal Yogini, Liang Zhitao, Yong Peng, Chen Hubiao, Zhao Zhongzhen

机构信息

School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, P, R, China.

出版信息

Chem Cent J. 2013 Oct 25;7(1):169. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-169.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aconitum is an indispensable entity of the traditional medicine therapy in Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), in spite of its known fatal toxicity characteristics. The prolonged use of this drug, irrespective of its known lethal effects, is governed by the practice of effective detoxification processes that have been used for decades. However, the processing methods of Ayurveda and TCM are different, and no comparative study has been carried out to evaluate their differences.The objective of the present study was to carry out comparative chemical profiling of the roots of Aconitum heterophyllum Wall, A. carmichaelii Debx., and A. kusnezoffii Reichb. after application of two detoxification methods used in Ayurveda and one method used in TCM .

RESULTS

Analysis of the processed samples was carried out by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography combined with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF/MS). The results obtained in the study demonstrate that all three processing methods used in Ayurveda and TCM effectively extract the diester diterpenoid alkaloids and led to their conversion into monoester diterpenoid alkaloids. The efficiency of the processes in reduction of toxic alkaloid contents can be stated as: Processing with water > Shodhana with cow milk > Shodhana with cow urine. The analysis method was validated as per ICH-Q2R1 guidelines and all the parameters were found to comply with the recommendations stated in the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been no reports till date, to compare the processing methods used in Ayurveda with the methods used in TCM for detoxification of aconite roots. Our study demonstrates that, these methods used in both the traditional systems of medicine, efficiently detoxify the aconite roots. Amongst the three selected procedures, the TCM method of decoction with water is the most efficient. Through experimental evidences, we prove the conversion of toxic diester diterpenoid alkaloids to relatively safer monoester diterpenoid alkaloids. Thus, this study demonstrates that comparative study on the traditional experiences accumulated in different medical systems is useful for expanding their respective applications.

摘要

背景

尽管乌头已知具有致命毒性特征,但它是阿育吠陀医学和传统中医(TCM)传统药物疗法中不可或缺的一部分。尽管已知该药物有致死作用,但长期使用是通过已使用数十年的有效解毒方法来控制的。然而,阿育吠陀医学和传统中医的加工方法不同,尚未进行比较研究来评估它们的差异。本研究的目的是对应用阿育吠陀医学中使用的两种解毒方法和传统中医中使用的一种方法处理后的异叶乌头、乌头和库页乌头的根进行化学轮廓比较。

结果

通过超高效液相色谱结合四极杆飞行时间质谱(UHPLC-QTOF/MS)对处理后的样品进行分析。研究结果表明,阿育吠陀医学和传统中医使用的所有三种加工方法都能有效提取二酯二萜生物碱并使其转化为单酯二萜生物碱。降低有毒生物碱含量的工艺效率可表述为:水煮法>牛奶净制>牛尿净制。该分析方法按照ICH-Q2R1指南进行了验证,所有参数均符合指南中的建议。

结论

迄今为止,尚无关于比较阿育吠陀医学中使用的加工方法与传统中医中用于乌头根解毒的方法的报道。我们的研究表明,这两种传统医学体系中使用的方法都能有效地对乌头根进行解毒。在所选的三种方法中,传统中医的水煮法效率最高。通过实验证据,我们证明了有毒的二酯二萜生物碱转化为相对安全的单酯二萜生物碱。因此,本研究表明,对不同医学体系积累的传统经验进行比较研究有助于扩大它们各自的应用范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e97c/4015782/74c133bb9aeb/1752-153X-7-169-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验