Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, 11th Floor, Room 1104E, New York, NY, USA.
Environ Res. 2013 Nov;127:40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
To examine cooking practices and 24-h personal and kitchen area exposures to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and black carbon in cooks using biomass in Ghana.
Researchers administered a detailed survey to 421 households. In a sub-sample of 36 households, researchers collected 24-h integrated PM2.5 samples (personal and kitchen area); in addition, the primary cook was monitored for real-time PM2.5. All filters were also analyzed for black carbon using a multi-wavelength reflectance method. Predictors of PM2.5 exposure were analyzed, including cooking behaviors, fuel, stove and kitchen type, weather, demographic factors and other smoke sources.
The majority of households cooked outdoors (55%; 231/417), used biomass (wood or charcoal) as their primary fuel (99%; 412/413), and cooked on traditional fires (77%, 323/421). In the sub-sample of 29 households with complete, valid exposure monitoring data, the 24-h integrated concentrations of PM2.5 were substantially higher in the kitchen sample (mean 446.8 µg/m3) than in the personal air sample (mean 128.5 µg/m3). Black carbon concentrations followed the same pattern such that concentrations were higher in the kitchen sample (14.5 µg/m3) than in the personal air sample (8.8 µg/m3). Spikes in real-time personal concentrations of PM2.5 accounted for the majority of exposure; the most polluted 5%, or 72 min, of the 24-h monitoring period accounted for 75% of all exposure. Two variables that had some predictive power for personal PM2.5 exposures were primary fuel type and ethnicity, while reported kerosene lantern use was associated with increased personal and kitchen area concentrations of black carbon.
Personal concentrations of PM2.5 exhibited considerable inter-subject variability across kitchen types (enclosed, semi-enclosed, outdoor), and can be elevated even in outdoor cooking settings. Furthermore, personal concentrations of PM2.5 were not associated with kitchen type and were not predicted by kitchen area samples; rather they were driven by spikes in PM2.5 concentrations during cooking. Personal exposures were more enriched with black carbon when compared to kitchen area samples, underscoring the need to explore other sources of incomplete combustion such as roadway emissions, charcoal production and kerosene use.
研究加纳使用生物质燃料做饭的厨师的烹饪习惯以及个人和厨房区域 24 小时细颗粒物(PM2.5)和黑碳暴露情况。
研究人员对 421 户家庭进行了详细调查。在 36 户家庭的子样本中,研究人员收集了 24 小时个人和厨房区域的综合 PM2.5 样本;此外,对主要厨师进行了实时 PM2.5 监测。所有过滤器均采用多波长反射率法分析黑碳。分析了 PM2.5 暴露的预测因素,包括烹饪行为、燃料、炉灶和厨房类型、天气、人口统计因素和其他烟雾来源。
大多数家庭在户外做饭(55%,231/417),主要使用生物质(木材或木炭)作为燃料(99%,413/413),并使用传统炉灶做饭(77%,323/421)。在有完整、有效暴露监测数据的 29 户家庭的子样本中,厨房样本的 24 小时综合 PM2.5 浓度(平均 446.8μg/m3)明显高于个人空气样本(平均 128.5μg/m3)。黑碳浓度也呈现出相同的模式,即厨房样本浓度(14.5μg/m3)高于个人空气样本(8.8μg/m3)。实时个人 PM2.5 浓度的峰值占暴露的大部分;24 小时监测期间,污染最严重的 5%或 72 分钟,占所有暴露的 75%。对个人 PM2.5 暴露有一定预测能力的两个变量是主要燃料类型和种族,而报告使用煤油灯与个人和厨房区域黑碳浓度的增加有关。
厨房类型(封闭、半封闭、户外)内个人 PM2.5 浓度存在相当大的个体间变异性,即使在户外烹饪环境中,个人 PM2.5 浓度也可能升高。此外,个人 PM2.5 浓度与厨房类型无关,也不受厨房区域样本预测;相反,它们是由烹饪过程中 PM2.5 浓度的峰值驱动的。与厨房区域样本相比,个人暴露的黑碳含量更高,这突显了需要探索不完全燃烧的其他来源,例如道路排放、木炭生产和煤油使用。