Suppr超能文献

单克隆抗体时间分辨荧光免疫测定法与单克隆抗体捕获-生物素化检测酶免疫测定法用于呼吸道合胞病毒和副流感病毒抗原检测的比较。

Comparison of monoclonal antibody time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay with monoclonal antibody capture-biotinylated detector enzyme immunoassay for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus antigen detection.

作者信息

Hierholzer J C, Bingham P G, Coombs R A, Johansson K H, Anderson L J, Halonen P E

机构信息

Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1243-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1243-1249.1989.

Abstract

An all-monoclonal antibody, time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay was compared with several enzyme immunoassays for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus type 1, 2, and 3 antigens in clinical specimens. The most sensitive enzyme immunoassay for parainfluenza virus type 1 was an all-monoclonal antibody assay with biotin-labeled detector antibody and streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate, but for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus types 2 and 3 the most sensitive assay was a polyclonal antibody assay with horse capture antibodies and bovine or rabbit detector antibodies with anti-species peroxidase. All tests were evaluated with nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens from respiratory illnesses and with cell culture harvests of multiple strains of each virus isolated over many years. The time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay detected respiratory syncytial virus antigen in 92% of the specimens positive by culture, which was a decidedly higher sensitivity than either the monoclonal or polyclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay format (62 and 76%, respectively). For the parainfluenza viruses the time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay detected type-specific antigen in 94 to 100% of culture-positive specimens and again was more sensitive than the all-monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassays (75 to 89%) or all-polyclonal antibody enzyme immunoassays (66 to 95%). Combined with results from a previously reported adenovirus time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay, these tests identified respiratory antigens in large numbers of clinical specimens.

摘要

将一种全单克隆抗体时间分辨荧光免疫测定法与几种酶免疫测定法进行比较,以检测临床标本中的呼吸道合胞病毒以及1、2和3型副流感病毒抗原。检测1型副流感病毒最灵敏的酶免疫测定法是采用生物素标记检测抗体和链霉亲和素-过氧化物酶结合物的全单克隆抗体测定法,但对于呼吸道合胞病毒以及2型和3型副流感病毒,最灵敏的测定法是采用马捕获抗体和带有抗种属过氧化物酶的牛或兔检测抗体的多克隆抗体测定法。所有检测均使用呼吸道疾病患者的鼻咽抽吸物标本以及多年来分离出的每种病毒多个毒株的细胞培养收获物进行评估。时间分辨荧光免疫测定法在92%培养阳性的标本中检测到呼吸道合胞病毒抗原,这一灵敏度明显高于单克隆或多克隆抗体酶免疫测定法(分别为62%和76%)。对于副流感病毒,时间分辨荧光免疫测定法在94%至100%培养阳性的标本中检测到型特异性抗原,并且再次比全单克隆抗体酶免疫测定法(75%至89%)或全多克隆抗体酶免疫测定法(66%至95%)更灵敏。结合先前报道的腺病毒时间分辨荧光免疫测定法的结果,这些检测方法在大量临床标本中鉴定出呼吸道抗原。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Viral pneumonia in children.儿童病毒性肺炎
Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;9(3):217-233. doi: 10.1016/S1045-1870(98)80035-6. Epub 2006 Jun 3.
5
Parainfluenza viruses.副流感病毒
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 Apr;16(2):242-64. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.242-264.2003.

本文引用的文献

8
Rapid diagnosis of parainfluenza virus infection in children.儿童副流感病毒感染的快速诊断
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):164-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.164-167.1982.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验