Swenson P D, Kaplan M H
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Mar;23(3):485-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.485-488.1986.
A commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the rapid detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in respiratory secretions was evaluated by comparison with both virus isolation in HEp-2 cells and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) staining of exfoliated respiratory cells. Initial examination of 80 nasopharyngeal aspirates collected from infants with acute respiratory illness showed that the RSV EIA was positive for 21 of 24 specimens positive by virus isolation or IFA (87.5% sensitivity) and negative for 53 of 56 specimens negative by virus isolation and IFA (95% specificity). The EIA appears to be an acceptable and more rapid test than virus isolation for the detection of RSV, especially for laboratories in which prompt inoculation of specimens is not always possible. IFA staining with commercial bovine anti-RSV serum was found to be the most sensitive and rapid test for the detection of RSV. However, three of four specimens positive by IFA and negative by virus isolation were not cultured under optimal conditions. In addition, the IFA test requires a highly trained technologist to interpret the staining results.
通过与在HEp-2细胞中进行病毒分离以及对脱落的呼吸道细胞进行间接免疫荧光(IFA)染色相比较,对一种用于快速检测呼吸道分泌物中呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的商业酶免疫测定(EIA)进行了评估。对从患有急性呼吸道疾病的婴儿采集的80份鼻咽抽吸物进行的初步检测表明,在通过病毒分离或IFA检测为阳性的24份标本中,RSV EIA对其中21份呈阳性(敏感性为87.5%),在通过病毒分离和IFA检测为阴性的56份标本中,EIA对其中53份呈阴性(特异性为95%)。对于RSV的检测,EIA似乎是一种可接受的且比病毒分离更快的检测方法,特别是对于那些并非总能及时接种标本的实验室而言。发现使用商业牛抗RSV血清进行IFA染色是检测RSV最敏感且快速的检测方法。然而,通过IFA检测为阳性且通过病毒分离检测为阴性的四份标本中有三份未在最佳条件下培养。此外,IFA检测需要训练有素的技术人员来解读染色结果。