• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冒险选择:信息获取行为的考察。

Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior.

机构信息

Graduate School of Business Administration, Duke University, 27706, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1978 Sep;6(5):554-61. doi: 10.3758/BF03198244.

DOI:10.3758/BF03198244
PMID:24203389
Abstract

The monitoring of information acquisition behavior, along with other process tracing measures such as response times, was used to examine how individuals process information about gambles into a decision. Subjects indicated preferences among specially constructed three-outcome gambles. The number of alternatives available was varied across the sets of gambles. A majority of the subjects processed information about the gambles in ways inconsistent with compensatory models of risky decision making, such as information integration (Anderson & Shanteau, 1970). Furthermore, the inconsistency between observed information acquisition behavior and such compensatory rules increased as the choice task became more complex. Alternative explanations of risky choice behavior are considered.

摘要

信息获取行为的监测,以及其他过程追踪措施,如反应时间,被用来研究个体如何将有关赌博的信息处理为决策。被试者在特别构建的三结果赌博中表示偏好。可选择的选项数量在不同的赌博集之间有所变化。大多数被试者以与风险决策的补偿模型不一致的方式处理有关赌博的信息,例如信息整合(Anderson & Shanteau, 1970)。此外,随着选择任务变得更加复杂,观察到的信息获取行为与这种补偿规则之间的不一致性也增加了。还考虑了风险选择行为的其他解释。

相似文献

1
Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior.冒险选择:信息获取行为的考察。
Mem Cognit. 1978 Sep;6(5):554-61. doi: 10.3758/BF03198244.
2
The neural correlates of risky decision making across short and long runs.短期和长期风险决策的神经关联。
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 30;5:15831. doi: 10.1038/srep15831.
3
Neural signatures of intransitive preferences.非传递性偏好的神经特征。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Jun 9;4. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00049. eCollection 2010.
4
Preference patterns for skewed gambles in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴对偏态赌博的偏好模式。
Biol Lett. 2013 Dec 11;9(6):20130902. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0902. Print 2013.
5
The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: an eye-tracking analysis.风险选择决策的动态:眼动追踪分析。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 1;3:335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335. eCollection 2012.
6
Information overload or search-amplified risk? Set size and order effects on decisions from experience.信息过载还是搜索放大风险?设定大小和顺序对经验决策的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):1023-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0422-3.
7
Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles.不同反馈类型对重复货币赌博中信息整合的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 23;5:1597. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01597. eCollection 2014.
8
Greater decision-making competence is associated with greater expected-value sensitivity, but not overall risk taking: an examination of concurrent validity.更高的决策能力与更高的预期价值敏感性相关,但与总体冒险行为无关:一项同时效度检验。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 28;6:717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00717. eCollection 2015.
9
Aging and loss decision making: increased risk aversion and decreased use of maximizing information, with correlated rationality and value maximization.衰老与损失决策:风险厌恶增加,最大化信息的使用减少,理性与价值最大化相关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 13;9:280. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00280. eCollection 2015.
10
Sizing up information distortion: quantifying its effect on the subjective values of choice options.估量信息扭曲:量化其对选择选项的主观价值的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):349-56. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0184-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of inequality on social value orientation: an eye-tracking study.不平等对社会价值取向的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 28;16:1521101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521101. eCollection 2025.
2
Participants' Utilitarian Choice Is Influenced by Gamble Presentation and Age.参与者的功利主义选择受赌博呈现方式和年龄的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;14(7):536. doi: 10.3390/bs14070536.
3
Influence of the Manner of Information Presentation on Risky Choice.信息呈现方式对风险选择的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice.多选择的眼动分析。
Mem Cognit. 1975 May;3(3):267-76. doi: 10.3758/BF03212910.
2
An eye fixation analysis of choice and judgment with multiattribute stimuli.多属性刺激下的选择和判断的眼动分析。
Mem Cognit. 1976 Nov;4(6):747-52. doi: 10.3758/BF03213243.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 25;12:650206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650206. eCollection 2021.
4
Use of a controlled experiment and computational models to measure the impact of sequential peer exposures on decision making.使用对照实验和计算模型来衡量连续同伴接触对决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0234875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234875. eCollection 2020.
5
Choice Quality as a Function of Decision Accuracy and Search Cost.作为决策准确性和搜索成本函数的选择质量
Iran J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;14(3):203-210.
6
Temporal Discounting and Search Habits: Evidence for a Task-Dependent Relationship.时间折扣与搜索习惯:任务依赖关系的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 14;9:2102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02102. eCollection 2018.
7
Eye Movements in Risky Choice.风险决策中的眼动
J Behav Decis Mak. 2016 Apr-Jul;29(2-3):116-136. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1854. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
8
Testing process predictions of models of risky choice: a quantitative model comparison approach.测试风险选择模型的预测过程:一种定量模型比较方法。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 27;4:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00646. eCollection 2013.