Bellan Steve E, Gimenez Olivier, Choquet Rémi, Getz Wayne M
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 137 Mulford Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, U.S.A.
Methods Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr 1;4(4). doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.12021.
Distance sampling is widely used to estimate the abundance or density of wildlife populations. Methods to estimate wildlife mortality rates have developed largely independently from distance sampling, despite the conceptual similarities between estimation of cumulative mortality and the population density of living animals. Conventional distance sampling analyses rely on the assumption that animals are distributed uniformly with respect to transects and thus require randomized placement of transects during survey design. Because mortality events are rare, however, it is often not possible to obtain precise estimates in this way without infeasible levels of effort. A great deal of wildlife data, including mortality data, is available via road-based surveys. Interpreting these data in a distance sampling framework requires accounting for the non-uniformity sampling. Additionally, analyses of opportunistic mortality data must account for the decline in carcass detectability through time. We develop several extensions to distance sampling theory to address these problems.We build mortality estimators in a hierarchical framework that integrates animal movement data, surveillance effort data, and motion-sensor camera trap data, respectively, to relax the uniformity assumption, account for spatiotemporal variation in surveillance effort, and explicitly model carcass detection and disappearance as competing ongoing processes.Analysis of simulated data showed that our estimators were unbiased and that their confidence intervals had good coverage.We also illustrate our approach on opportunistic carcass surveillance data acquired in 2010 during an anthrax outbreak in the plains zebra of Etosha National Park, Namibia.The methods developed here will allow researchers and managers to infer mortality rates from opportunistic surveillance data.
距离抽样被广泛用于估计野生动物种群的丰度或密度。尽管累积死亡率估计与活体动物种群密度估计在概念上有相似之处,但估计野生动物死亡率的方法在很大程度上是独立于距离抽样发展起来的。传统的距离抽样分析依赖于动物相对于样带均匀分布的假设,因此在调查设计期间需要随机放置样带。然而,由于死亡事件很少见,通常不可能以这种方式获得精确估计,除非付出不可行的努力水平。大量的野生动物数据,包括死亡率数据,可通过基于道路的调查获得。在距离抽样框架中解释这些数据需要考虑抽样的不均匀性。此外,对机会性死亡率数据的分析必须考虑到尸体可探测性随时间的下降。我们对距离抽样理论进行了若干扩展以解决这些问题。我们在一个分层框架中构建死亡率估计器,该框架分别整合动物移动数据、监测努力数据和运动传感器相机陷阱数据,以放宽均匀性假设,考虑监测努力的时空变化,并将尸体检测和消失明确建模为相互竞争的持续过程。对模拟数据的分析表明,我们的估计器是无偏的,并且它们的置信区间具有良好的覆盖率。我们还展示了我们对2010年在纳米比亚埃托沙国家公园平原斑马炭疽疫情期间获取的机会性尸体监测数据的处理方法。这里开发的方法将使研究人员和管理人员能够从机会性监测数据中推断死亡率。