• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

车辆轻量化的生命周期评估:基于质量引起的燃料消耗的物理模型。

Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption.

机构信息

Systems Analytics and Environmental Sciences Department, Ford Motor Company, Mail Drop RIC-2122, Dearborn, Michigan 48121-2053, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Dec 17;47(24):14358-66. doi: 10.1021/es402954w. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1021/es402954w
PMID:24237249
Abstract

Lightweighting is a key strategy used to improve vehicle fuel economy. Replacing conventional materials (e.g., steel) with lighter alternatives (e.g., aluminum, magnesium, and composites) decreases energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during vehicle use, but often increases energy consumption and GHG emissions during materials and vehicle production. Assessing the life-cycle benefits of mass reduction requires a quantitative description of the mass-induced fuel consumption during vehicle use. A new physics-based method for estimating mass-induced fuel consumption (MIF) is proposed. We illustrate the utility of this method by using publicly available data to calculate MIF values in the range of 0.2-0.5 L/(100 km 100 kg) based on 106 records of fuel economy tests by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for 2013 model year vehicles. Lightweighting is shown to have the most benefit when applied to vehicles with high fuel consumption and high power. Use of the physics-based model presented here would place future life cycle assessment studies of vehicle lightweighting on a firmer scientific foundation.

摘要

轻量化是提高车辆燃油经济性的关键策略。用更轻的替代品(如铝、镁和复合材料)替代传统材料(如钢),可以降低车辆使用过程中的能源消耗和温室气体(GHG)排放,但通常会增加材料和车辆生产过程中的能源消耗和 GHG 排放。评估减重的生命周期效益需要对车辆使用过程中的质量引起的燃料消耗进行定量描述。提出了一种新的基于物理的方法来估算质量引起的燃料消耗(MIF)。我们通过使用公开可用的数据来说明该方法的实用性,根据美国环境保护署 2013 年车型的 106 份燃油经济性测试记录,计算出 0.2-0.5 L/(100 km 100 kg)范围内的 MIF 值。结果表明,当应用于高油耗和高功率的车辆时,轻量化的效果最佳。使用这里提出的基于物理的模型将使未来的车辆轻量化生命周期评估研究建立在更坚实的科学基础上。

相似文献

1
Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption.车辆轻量化的生命周期评估:基于质量引起的燃料消耗的物理模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Dec 17;47(24):14358-66. doi: 10.1021/es402954w. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
2
Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Lightweighting: Novel Mathematical Methods to Estimate Use-Phase Fuel Consumption.车辆轻量化的生命周期评估:用于估计使用阶段燃料消耗的新数学方法。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 18;49(16):10209-16. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01655. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
3
Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Lightweighting: A Physics-Based Model To Estimate Use-Phase Fuel Consumption of Electrified Vehicles.车辆轻量化的生命周期评估:基于物理模型的电动汽车使用阶段燃料消耗估算
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Oct 18;50(20):11226-11233. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02059. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
4
Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization.汽车轻量化的生命周期能源和温室气体排放效益:综述与协调。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jun 18;47(12):6089-97. doi: 10.1021/es3042115. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Review of the Fuel Saving, Life Cycle GHG Emission, and Ownership Cost Impacts of Lightweighting Vehicles with Different Powertrains.不同动力系统的车辆轻量化对节油、生命周期 GHG 排放和拥有成本的影响综述。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8215-8228. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00909. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
Impacts of Vehicle Weight Reduction via Material Substitution on Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions.通过材料替代减轻车辆重量对生命周期温室气体排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 20;49(20):12535-42. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03192. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
7
Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.在美国企业平均燃油经济性政策和温室气体排放标准下,替代燃料汽车的采用增加了车队的汽油消耗和温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2165-74. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02842. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
A Dynamic Fleet Model of U.S Light-Duty Vehicle Lightweighting and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 2016 to 2050.2016 年至 2050 年美国轻型车轻量化与相关温室气体排放的动态车队模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 19;53(4):2199-2208. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04249. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.替代汽车燃料的生命周期比较。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-79.
10
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical factors affecting life cycle assessments of material choice for vehicle mass reduction.影响用于车辆减重的材料选择的生命周期评估的关键因素。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2017 Oct 2;56:241-257. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.010.