Suppr超能文献

死亡喉音:批判性回顾与研究议程。

Death rattle: critical review and research agenda.

机构信息

Anesthesia & intensive Care & Pain Relief and Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2014 Feb;22(2):571-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2047-5. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Abstract

The aim of this critical review was to assess the literature regarding the treatment of death rattle at the end of life to provide an update information regarding this difficult issue. To provide suggestions for future research agenda, the approach was analytic and based on clinical considerations, rather than on raw evidence only. Both published and unpublished reports from an extensive search of electronic databases. Any randomized-controlled trial or clinical reports with a significant number of patients was considered. Eleven reports fulfilled the inclusion criteria in this systematic review. Four controlled studies, four comparative audits, and three clinical reports with a significant number of patients were selected. Despite anticholinergic or antimuscarinic medications are the drugs of choice in practice, there is a lack of supporting evidence for the use of anticholinergics to treat death rattle. Regardless of the methodological limitations of existing studies, an a priori observation was missed. Most studies were performed with the intent to treat rather than to prevent death rattle. However, from a pharmacological perspective, anticholinergic agents are unable to reduce the secretions once they are formed, but may just limit a further production. In conclusion, studies on the use of antisecretive agents provided only minor evidence of efficacy, ultimately raising questions about the routine inclusion of anticholinergic treatment in end of life pathways for the treatment of death rattle. However, this observation could be confuted by the use of these same drugs used earlier in a prophylactic perspective, in the context of a comprehensive management of the dying patients.

摘要

本综述的目的是评估关于生命终末期死亡喉音治疗的文献,以提供有关这一难题的最新信息。为了为未来的研究议程提供建议,方法是分析性的,基于临床考虑,而不仅仅是基于原始证据。从广泛的电子数据库搜索中包括已发表和未发表的报告。任何随机对照试验或有大量患者的临床报告都被认为是合适的。本系统评价共纳入 11 份报告。选择了 4 项对照研究、4 项比较性审计和 3 项有大量患者的临床报告。尽管抗胆碱能或抗毒蕈碱药物是目前实践中的首选药物,但缺乏支持使用抗胆碱能药物治疗死亡喉音的证据。尽管现有研究存在方法学上的局限性,但仍存在一个先验观察的问题。大多数研究都是为了治疗而不是预防死亡喉音而进行的。然而,从药理学的角度来看,抗胆碱能药物一旦形成就无法减少分泌物,但可能只是限制进一步的产生。总之,关于使用止分泌剂的研究仅提供了疗效的少量证据,最终对在生命终末期路径中常规包括抗胆碱能治疗以治疗死亡喉音提出了质疑。然而,通过在综合管理临终患者的背景下,从预防的角度更早地使用这些相同的药物,这种观察可能会被反驳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验