Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, Box 93, PH 10-203, New York, NY 10032, USA.
BMJ. 2013 Nov 20;347:f6571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6571.
To determine whether high performing hospitals with low 30 day risk standardized readmission rates have a lower proportion of readmissions from specific diagnoses and time periods after admission or instead have a similar distribution of readmission diagnoses and timing to lower performing institutions.
Retrospective cohort study.
Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.
Patients aged 65 and older who were readmitted within 30 days after hospital admission for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia in 2007-09.
Readmission diagnoses were classified with a modified version of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' condition categories, and readmission timing was classified by day (0-30) after hospital discharge. Hospital 30 day risk standardized readmission rates over the three years of study were calculated with public reporting methods of the US federal government, and hospitals were categorized with bootstrap analysis as having high, average, or low readmission performance for each index condition. High and low performing hospitals had ≥ 95% probability of having an interval estimate respectively less than or greater than the national 30 day readmission rate over the three year period of study. All remaining hospitals were considered average performers.
For readmissions in the 30 days after the index admission, there were 320,003 after 1,291,211 admissions for heart failure (4041 hospitals), 102,536 after 517,827 admissions for acute myocardial infarction (2378 hospitals), and 208,438 after 1,135,932 admissions for pneumonia (4283 hospitals). The distribution of readmissions by diagnosis was similar across categories of hospital performance for all three conditions. High performing hospitals had fewer readmissions for all common diagnoses. Median time to readmission was similar by hospital performance for heart failure and acute myocardial infarction, though was 1.4 days longer among high versus low performing hospitals for pneumonia (P<0.001). Findings were unchanged after adjustment for other hospital characteristics potentially associated with readmission patterns.
High performing hospitals have proportionately fewer 30 day readmissions without differences in readmission diagnoses and timing, suggesting the possible benefit of strategies that lower risk of readmission globally rather than for specific diagnoses or time periods after hospital stay.
确定低 30 天风险标准化再入院率的高绩效医院是否具有较低比例的特定诊断和入院后特定时间段的再入院率,或者是否具有较低绩效机构相似的再入院诊断和时间分布。
回顾性队列研究。
美国医疗保险受益人群。
2007-09 年因心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死或肺炎住院后 30 天内再次入院的年龄在 65 岁及以上的患者。
再入院诊断采用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)条件分类的改良版本进行分类,再入院时间按住院后第 0-30 天进行分类。使用美国联邦政府的公开报告方法计算了医院 30 天风险标准化再入院率,采用 bootstrap 分析将高、中、低三种再入院绩效指数条件的医院分为高、中、低三种。高绩效和低绩效医院在研究的三年期间,各自的区间估计值具有大于或小于国家 30 天再入院率的 95%概率。所有其他医院都被认为是平均绩效医院。
在指数住院后的 30 天内,心力衰竭有 320033 例再入院,涉及 1291211 例入院(4041 家医院);急性心肌梗死有 102536 例再入院,涉及 517827 例入院(2378 家医院);肺炎有 208438 例再入院,涉及 1135932 例入院(4283 家医院)。所有三种疾病的再入院诊断分布在医院绩效类别之间相似。对于所有常见诊断,高绩效医院的再入院例数较少。心力衰竭和急性心肌梗死的再入院时间与医院绩效之间相似,但肺炎的再入院时间在高绩效医院比低绩效医院长 1.4 天(P<0.001)。在调整其他可能与再入院模式相关的医院特征后,结果保持不变。
高绩效医院的 30 天再入院比例较低,再入院诊断和时间无差异,这表明可能受益于降低整体再入院风险的策略,而不是针对特定诊断或住院后特定时间段。