• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏电生理学计算模型的验证。

Verification of computational models of cardiac electro-physiology.

机构信息

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; Computational Biology Group, Oxford University, UK.

出版信息

Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2014 May;30(5):525-44. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2615. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1002/cnm.2615
PMID:24259465
Abstract

For computational models of cardiac activity to be used in safety-critical clinical decision-making, thorough and rigorous testing of the accuracy of predictions is required. The field of 'verification, validation and uncertainty quantification' has been developed to evaluate the credibility of computational predictions. The first stage, verification, is the evaluation of how well computational software correctly solves the underlying mathematical equations. The aim of this paper is to introduce novel methods for verifying multi-cellular electro-physiological solvers, a crucial first stage for solvers to be used with confidence in clinical applications. We define 1D-3D model problems with exact solutions for each of the monodomain, bidomain, and bidomain-with-perfusing-bath formulations of cardiac electro-physiology, which allow for the first time the testing of cardiac solvers against exact errors on fully coupled problems in all dimensions. These problems are carefully constructed so that they can be easily run using a general solver and can be used to greatly increase confidence that an implementation is correct, which we illustrate by testing one major solver, 'Chaste', on the problems. We then perform case studies on calculation verification (also known as solution verification) for two specific applications. We conclude by making several recommendations regarding verification in cardiac modelling.

摘要

为了使心脏活动的计算模型能够用于安全关键的临床决策,需要对预测的准确性进行彻底和严格的测试。“验证、确认和不确定性量化”领域已经发展起来,以评估计算预测的可信度。第一阶段是验证,即评估计算软件在多大程度上正确地解决了基本的数学方程。本文的目的是介绍用于验证多细胞电生理求解器的新方法,这是求解器在临床应用中具有信心地使用的关键的第一步。我们为心脏电生理的单域、双域和双域-灌流浴公式定义了 1D-3D 模型问题,每个问题都有精确解,这使得首次可以在所有维度上对完全耦合问题进行针对精确误差的心脏求解器测试。这些问题是精心构建的,以便可以使用通用求解器轻松运行,并且可以极大地增加对实现正确性的信心,我们通过在这些问题上测试一个主要求解器“Chaste”来说明这一点。然后,我们针对两个特定应用进行了计算验证(也称为解验证)的案例研究。最后,我们就心脏建模中的验证提出了几点建议。

相似文献

1
Verification of computational models of cardiac electro-physiology.心脏电生理学计算模型的验证。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2014 May;30(5):525-44. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2615. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
2
CHASTE: incorporating a novel multi-scale spatial and temporal algorithm into a large-scale open source library.CHASTE:将一种新颖的多尺度时空算法整合到一个大规模的开源库中。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 May 28;367(1895):1907-30. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0309.
3
Ensuring reliability of safety-critical clinical applications of computational cardiac models.确保计算心脏模型在临床关键安全应用中的可靠性。
Front Physiol. 2013 Dec 11;4:358. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00358. eCollection 2013.
4
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
5
A comparison of non-standard solvers for ODEs describing cellular reactions in the heart.用于描述心脏细胞反应的常微分方程的非标准求解器比较。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2007 Oct;10(5):317-26. doi: 10.1080/10255840701259301.
6
Chaste: Cancer, Heart and Soft Tissue Environment.贞节:癌症、心脏与软组织环境。
J Open Source Softw. 2020 Mar 13;5(47):1848. doi: 10.21105/joss.01848.
7
A high-resolution computational model of the deforming human heart.一个变形人类心脏的高分辨率计算模型。
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015 Aug;14(4):829-49. doi: 10.1007/s10237-014-0639-8. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
8
Chaste: an open source C++ library for computational physiology and biology.Chaste:一个用于计算生理学和生物学的开源 C++ 库。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002970. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
9
Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.我的模型足够好吗?肌肉骨骼模型及运动模拟验证与确认的最佳实践。
J Biomech Eng. 2015 Feb 1;137(2):020905. doi: 10.1115/1.4029304. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
Computing the stability of steady-state solutions of mathematical models of the electrical activity in the heart.计算心脏电活动数学模型稳态解的稳定性。
Comput Biol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Credibility Assessment of the Patient-Specific Modeling of the Aneurysmal Ascending Thoracic Aorta: Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification.胸主动脉瘤患者特异性建模的可信度评估:验证、确认与不确定性量化
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s13239-025-00801-1.
2
Numerical accuracy of closed-loop steady state in a zero-dimensional cardiovascular model.零维心血管模型中闭环稳态的数值精度。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025 Apr 2;383(2293):20240208. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0208.
3
Evaluation of an open-source pipeline to create patient-specific left atrial models: A reproducibility study.
评估一个开源管道来创建患者特异性左心房模型:一项可重复性研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Aug;162:107009. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107009. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
Credibility assessment of patient-specific computational modeling using patient-specific cardiac modeling as an exemplar.以患者特定心脏建模为例评估患者特异性计算建模的可信度。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 10;18(10):e1010541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010541. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Interactive 3D Human Heart Simulations on Segmented Human MRI Hearts.基于分割的人体心脏磁共振成像的交互式3D人体心脏模拟
Comput Cardiol (2010). 2021 Sep;48. doi: 10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662948. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Evaluation framework for systems models.系统模型评估框架。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;11(3):264-289. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12755. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
An audit of uncertainty in multi-scale cardiac electrophysiology models.多尺度心脏电生理学模型不确定性的审核。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190335. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0335. Epub 2020 May 25.
8
Considering discrepancy when calibrating a mechanistic electrophysiology model.考虑在对机制电生理学模型进行校准时的差异。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun 12;378(2173):20190349. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0349. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.心脏动作电位模型的综合不确定性量化与敏感性分析
Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 26;10:721. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00721. eCollection 2019.
10
Sensitivity of Ablation Targets Prediction to Electrophysiological Parameter Variability in Image-Based Computational Models of Ventricular Tachycardia in Post-infarction Patients.梗死患者室性心动过速基于图像的计算模型中消融靶点预测对电生理参数变异性的敏感性
Front Physiol. 2019 May 24;10:628. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00628. eCollection 2019.