Suppr超能文献

正常健康受试者头部前伸姿势评估的评分者内信度和评分者间信度

The Intra- and Inter-rater Reliabilities of the Forward Head Posture Assessment of Normal Healthy Subjects.

作者信息

Nam Seok Hyun, Son Sung Min, Kwon Jung Won, Lee Na Kyung

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Jun;25(6):737-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.737. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

Abstract

[Purpose] Assessment of posture is an important goal of physical therapy interventions for preventing the progression of forward head posture (FHP). The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the assessment of FHP. [Subjects and Methods] We recruited 45 participants (20 male subjects, 25 female subjects) from a university student population. Two physical therapists assessed FHP using images of head extension. FHP is characterized by the measurement of angles and distances between anatomical landmarks. Forward shoulder angle of 54° or less was defined as FHP. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were estimated using Kendall's Taub correlation coefficients. [Results] Intra-class correlation of intra-rater measurements indicated an excellent level of reliability (0.91), and intra-class correlation of inter-rater measurements showed a good level of reliability in the assessment of FHP (0.75). [Conclusion] Assessment of FHP is an important component of evaluation and affects the design of the treatment regimen. The assessment of FHP was reliably measured by two physical therapists. It could therefore become a useful method for assessing FHP in the clinical setting. Future studies will be needed to provide more detailed quantitative data for accurate assessment of posture.

摘要

[目的] 姿势评估是物理治疗干预预防头前倾姿势(FHP)进展的重要目标。本研究的目的是确定FHP评估的评分者间信度和评分者内信度。[对象与方法] 我们从大学生群体中招募了45名参与者(20名男性受试者,25名女性受试者)。两名物理治疗师使用头部伸展图像评估FHP。FHP通过测量解剖标志之间的角度和距离来表征。前肩角54°或更小被定义为FHP。使用肯德尔Taub相关系数估计评分者内信度和评分者间信度。[结果] 评分者内测量的组内相关性表明信度水平极佳(0.91),评分者间测量的组内相关性在FHP评估中显示出良好的信度水平(0.7)。[结论] FHP评估是评估的重要组成部分,影响治疗方案的设计。两名物理治疗师对FHP的评估测量可靠。因此,它可能成为临床环境中评估FHP的有用方法。未来需要进行更多研究以提供更详细的定量数据用于姿势的准确评估。

相似文献

6
Sensitivity of clinical assessments of sagittal head posture.矢状位头部姿势的临床评估的敏感性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01137.x.
10
Evaluation of forward head posture in sitting and standing positions.坐姿和站姿下头部前倾姿势的评估。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3577-3582. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4254-x. Epub 2015 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Measurement of cervical posture in the sagittal plane.矢状面颈椎姿势的测量。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验