• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与智障人士共同研究:全国性调查的启示。

Co-researching with people who have intellectual disabilities: insights from a national survey.

机构信息

Centre for Disability Studies, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):65-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12074. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12074
PMID:24376031
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inclusive research with people with intellectual disabilities is growing internationally but with few studies examining its feasibility.

METHODS

In undertaking a national study exploring what life was like in Ireland for people with intellectual disabilities, a community of practice was developed involving a core group of co-researchers: five people with intellectual disabilities, four university researchers and three service support staff. An additional cadre of 15 co-researchers with intellectual disabilities was recruited to undertake data gathering and analysis with 23 focus groups involving 168 participants. The research experience was documented through oral feedback, progress reports, minutes and a project review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The key learning is documented arising from the setting up of an inclusive advisory group and implementation of each of six research steps. The study demonstrates feasibility and the added value of university co-researchers recruiting and developing skills together with co-researchers with intellectual disabilities. Topics for further research and development are identified. This paper tells you about how people with intellectual disabilities worked with a group of university researchers. Both groups were called co-researchers and together they ran 23 focus groups across Ireland. People with intellectual disabilities talked about their lives and what could make them better. They said they needed to have a good place to live; a job; enough money; relationships; and acceptance as respected citizens. The university co-researchers wrote about what it was like doing research together and how people with intellectual disabilities joined the advisory group; decided on the questions; ran focus groups; and presented findings. Together they grew into a community of researchers where the university co-researchers shared their research skills and people with intellectual disabilities shared what it was like living with a disability. They both saw great value in working together and plan to work more to make this type of research happen.

摘要

背景

包容性研究在国际上越来越多地涉及智力障碍人士,但很少有研究探讨其可行性。

方法

在进行一项全国性研究,以了解爱尔兰智力障碍人士的生活状况时,成立了一个实践共同体,其中包括核心小组成员:五名智力障碍人士、四名大学研究人员和三名服务支持人员。还招募了另外 15 名智力障碍共同研究者,他们与 23 个焦点小组的 168 名参与者一起进行数据收集和分析。研究经验通过口头反馈、进度报告、会议记录和项目审查来记录。

结果和结论

本文记录了从成立包容性咨询小组到实施六个研究步骤的关键学习成果。该研究证明了可行性以及大学共同研究者与智力障碍共同研究者一起招募和培养技能的附加价值。确定了进一步研究和发展的主题。本文介绍了智力障碍人士如何与一组大学研究人员合作。这两个群体都被称为共同研究者,他们一起在爱尔兰举办了 23 个焦点小组。智力障碍人士谈论了他们的生活以及如何使他们的生活变得更好。他们表示,他们需要有一个好的居住场所、一份工作、足够的钱、人际关系和作为受尊重公民的认可。大学共同研究者撰写了一起进行研究的体验,以及智力障碍人士如何加入咨询小组、决定问题、开展焦点小组和呈现研究结果。他们共同成长为一个研究人员社区,在这个社区中,大学共同研究者分享他们的研究技能,智力障碍人士分享生活在残疾中的体验。他们都看到了共同合作的巨大价值,并计划开展更多工作,使这种类型的研究成为可能。

相似文献

1
Co-researching with people who have intellectual disabilities: insights from a national survey.与智障人士共同研究:全国性调查的启示。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):65-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12074. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
2
Inclusive research: making a difference to policy and legislation.包容性研究:对政策和立法产生影响。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/jar.12085. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
3
Identifying the key concerns of Irish persons with intellectual disability.识别爱尔兰智障人士的主要担忧。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Nov;27(6):564-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12099. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
A collaborative group method of inclusive research.协作式包容性研究方法。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):54-64. doi: 10.1111/jar.12082. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
5
Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability.将智障人士纳入研究的概念化。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/jar.12083. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
6
Participatory data analysis alongside co-researchers who have Down syndrome.与患有唐氏综合征的共同研究人员一起进行参与式数据分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/jar.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
7
Building an inclusive research team: the importance of team building and skills training.建设包容性研究团队:团队建设和技能培训的重要性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):13-22. doi: 10.1111/jar.12076. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
8
Doing Research Together: A Study on the Views of Advisors with Intellectual Disabilities and Non-Disabled Researchers Collaborating in Research.共同开展研究:一项关于智障顾问与非残疾研究人员合作开展研究观点的研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Mar;29(2):146-59. doi: 10.1111/jar.12165. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
Family voices: life for family carers of people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland.家庭之声:爱尔兰智障人士家庭照顾者的生活。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Mar;26(2):119-32. doi: 10.1111/jar.12003. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
10
The development of a co-researcher training with and for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.与智障和发育障碍人士共同开展研究人员培训。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 May;37(3):e13200. doi: 10.1111/jar.13200.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dignity Project Framework: An extreme citizen science framework in occupational therapy and rehabilitation research.尊严项目框架:职业治疗和康复研究中的极端公民科学框架。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):742-752. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12847. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
2
Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services.智力和发育障碍服务质量结果测量前沿的成功实践
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022;3. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.871178.
3
Challenges of having a loving partner: the views of adults with intellectual disabilities.
拥有亲密伴侣的挑战:智障成年人的观点。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2019 Dec 17;68(1):64-72. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1701786. eCollection 2022.
4
Partnering with older people as peer researchers.与老年人合作成为同行研究人员。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1879-1889. doi: 10.1111/hex.13331. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
5
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Inclusive approaches to developing content valid patient-reported outcome measure response scales for youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities.为智力/发育障碍青少年制定具有内容效度的患者报告结局测量反应量表的包容性方法。
Br J Learn Disabil. 2021 Mar;49(1):100-110. doi: 10.1111/bld.12346. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Assessment of Stakeholder Engagement in a Down Syndrome Research Study.唐氏综合征研究中利益相关者参与情况的评估
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021 Jan 19;8(1):64-67. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1777. eCollection 2021 Winter.
8
"We have been magnified for years - Now you are under the microscope!": Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities Created an Online Survey to Challenge Public Understanding of Learning Disabilities.“多年来我们一直备受关注——现在轮到你们接受审视了!”:学习障碍共同研究者开展在线调查,以挑战公众对学习障碍的认知。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2020 Apr 21;20. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376278. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Facilitators and barriers to co-research by people with dementia and academic researchers: Findings from a qualitative study.痴呆症患者与学术研究人员共同开展研究的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究的结果
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):761-771. doi: 10.1111/hex.12891. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Recruiting and Retaining People With Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions.招募和留住残疾人士参与定性健康研究:挑战与解决方案。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833361. Epub 2019 Mar 12.