NEAD, Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland ; Department of Communication Computer and System Sciences, DIBRIS, CasaPaganini - InfoMus, University of Genoa Genoa, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 13;4:841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00841. eCollection 2013.
When people perform a task as part of a joint action, their behavior is not the same as it would be if they were performing the same task alone, since it has to be adapted to facilitate shared understanding (or sometimes to prevent it). Joint performance of music offers a test bed for ecologically valid investigations of the way non-verbal behavior facilitates joint action. Here we compare the expressive movement of violinists when playing in solo and ensemble conditions. The first violinists of two string quartets (SQs), professional and student, were asked to play the same musical fragments in a solo condition and with the quartet. Synchronized multimodal recordings were created from the performances, using a specially developed software platform. Different patterns of head movement were observed. By quantifying them using an appropriate measure of entropy, we showed that head movements are more predictable in the quartet scenario. Rater evaluations showed that the change does not, as might be assumed, entail markedly reduced expression. They showed some ability to discriminate between solo and ensemble performances, but did not distinguish them in terms of emotional content or expressiveness. The data raise provocative questions about joint action in realistically complex scenarios.
当人们作为联合行动的一部分执行任务时,他们的行为与单独执行相同任务时不同,因为它必须适应以促进共享理解(或者有时是为了防止这种情况发生)。音乐的联合演奏为生态有效研究非言语行为如何促进联合行动提供了一个试验台。在这里,我们比较了小提琴手在独奏和合奏条件下的表现力动作。两个弦乐四重奏(SQ)的第一小提琴手,专业和学生,被要求在独奏和四重奏中演奏相同的音乐片段。使用专门开发的软件平台,从表演中创建了同步的多模态记录。观察到不同模式的头部运动。通过使用适当的熵度量对其进行量化,我们表明头部运动在四重奏场景中更可预测。评分者评估表明,这种变化并不像人们可能认为的那样,会导致明显减少表达。他们确实能够区分独奏和合奏表演,但在情感内容或表现力方面没有区分。这些数据引发了关于现实复杂场景中联合行动的发人深省的问题。