• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常和不良白人男性青少年的罗夏差异:判别函数分析。

Rorschach differences in normal and delinquent white male adolescents: A discriminant function analysis.

机构信息

Illinois State Psychiatric Institute, Chicago.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 1979 Dec;8(4):379-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02088656.

DOI:10.1007/BF02088656
PMID:24317841
Abstract

Rorschach productions from 38 normal and 30 delinquent White male adolescents were scored by three Ph.D. clinical psychologists according to the method given by Beck. The groups were equated for IQ, social class, and age at the time of testing. Rorschach scales representative of various personality dimensions, i.e.,R, M, F, F+, FC, CF, C, FC: CF + C, Sum C, Affective Ratio, Shading, H, andA, were subjected to a linear discriminant analysis. The results showed highly significant and accurate differentiation between the groups (p<0.0005, correct classification rate =86.8%); however, theAffective Ratio was the only scale that heavily contributed to the discrimination. The difference between the groups on this scale was attributed to the delinquents' passive cognitive style. The results also lend support to the notion that delinquents differ from normals along the dimension of impulsivity, a finding relevant to psychodynamic theories of delinquency as reflective of serious ego deficits. Fuller consideration of Rorschach symbolic content and qualitative features of response is recommended.

摘要

38 名正常和 30 名犯罪白人男性青少年的罗夏测验结果由 3 位博士临床心理学家根据贝克的方法进行评分。两组在智商、社会阶层和测试时的年龄方面相匹配。各种人格维度的罗夏测验量表,即 R、M、F、F+、FC、CF、C、FC:CF+C、总和 C、情感比率、阴影、H 和 A,进行了线性判别分析。结果表明,两组之间存在高度显著和准确的差异(p<0.0005,正确分类率=86.8%);然而,情感比率是唯一对区分有重大贡献的量表。该量表上两组之间的差异归因于犯罪者的被动认知风格。这些结果也支持了这样一种观点,即犯罪者在冲动性维度上与正常人不同,这一发现与犯罪的心理动力学理论有关,反映了严重的自我缺陷。建议更充分地考虑罗夏符号内容和反应的定性特征。

相似文献

1
Rorschach differences in normal and delinquent white male adolescents: A discriminant function analysis.正常和不良白人男性青少年的罗夏差异:判别函数分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 1979 Dec;8(4):379-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02088656.
2
Inhibition deficits of serious delinquent boys of low intelligence.智力低下的严重少年犯的抑制缺陷。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2007;17(5):274-92. doi: 10.1002/cbm.661.
3
The Rorschach and the assessment of impulsivity.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):633-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<633::aid-jclp2270500421>3.0.co;2-h.
4
Further psychodrama with delinquent adolescents.
Adolescence. 1985 Fall;20(79):599-604.
5
Personality patterns of delinquent females: ethnic and sociocultural variations.违法犯罪女性的人格模式:种族与社会文化差异
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Jan;38(1):198-206. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<198::aid-jclp2270380134>3.0.co;2-n.
6
[Evaluation of the aggressiveness in a group of adolescents from Puerto Rico].[对一群来自波多黎各青少年的攻击性评估]
Quad Criminol Clin. 1975 Apr-Jun;17(2):265-77.
7
Notes on Rorschach tests of 500 juvenile delinquents and a control group of 500 non-delinquent adolescents.对500名青少年罪犯和500名非犯罪青少年对照组进行罗夏测试的记录。
J Proj Tech. 1951 Jun;15(2):144-72. doi: 10.1080/08853126.1951.10380370.
8
Rorschach indices of children classified as hyperactive.被归类为多动症儿童的罗夏测验指标。
Percept Mot Skills. 1981 Jun;52(3):703-7. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.52.3.703.
9
The utilization of the Rorschach test in a case-controlled study.罗夏墨迹测验在一项病例对照研究中的应用。
Cephalalgia. 1986 Jun;6(2):87-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1986.0602087.x.
10
D-amphetamine and delinquency: hyperkinesis persisting?右旋苯丙胺与犯罪行为:多动症是否持续存在?
Dis Nerv Syst. 1974 Dec;35(12):543-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective attention and self-control in delinquent adolescents.注意缺陷多动障碍青少年的选择性注意和自我控制。
J Youth Adolesc. 1981 Jun;10(3):211-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02088971.

本文引用的文献

1
The "impulsivity index": Its application to juvenile delinquency.“冲动指数”:在青少年犯罪中的应用。
J Youth Adolesc. 1972 Jun;1(2):179-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01537072.
2
The similarity in Rorschach patterns of adult criminal psychopaths and preadolescent boys.
Rorschach Res Exch J Proj Tech. 1945 Dec;9:201-6. doi: 10.1080/08934037.1945.10381408.
3
Formation of the antisocial character.反社会人格的形成。
Psychoanal Study Child. 1945;1:189-203. doi: 10.1080/00797308.1945.11823132.
4
Content analysis of the Rorschach with regard to anxiety and hostility.关于焦虑和敌意的罗夏墨迹测验内容分析。
Rorschach Res Exch J Proj Tech. 1949 Sep;13(3):247-84. doi: 10.1080/10683402.1949.10381465.
5
Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores; a review.应用于罗夏墨迹测验分数的统计方法;综述
Psychol Bull. 1949 Sep;46(5):393-429. doi: 10.1037/h0059467.
6
A quantitative approach of affective symbolism in Rorschach responses.罗夏测验反应中情感象征的定量方法。
J Proj Tech. 1952 Jun;16(2):133-50. doi: 10.1080/08853126.1952.10380415.
7
The validity of anxiety and hostility Rorschach content scores among adolescents.青少年罗夏墨迹测验焦虑与敌意内容得分的效度
J Consult Psychol. 1952 Feb;16(1):73-5. doi: 10.1037/h0059988.
8
Impulsivity as indicated by Rorschach test factors.由罗夏测验因素所表明的冲动性。
J Consult Psychol. 1951 Dec;15(6):464-8. doi: 10.1037/h0061368.
9
RELATION BETWEEN BARRIER SCORES AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR.屏障评分与攻击性行为之间的关系。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1965 Aug;70:307-11. doi: 10.1037/h0022414.
10
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NORMAL ADOLESCENTS.正常青少年的临床评估
Am J Psychiatry. 1965 Mar;121:864-72. doi: 10.1176/ajp.121.9.864.