Department of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Mar;24(3):227-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
The prevailing pathomechanistic paradigm for myotonic dystrophy (DM) is that aberrant expression of embryonic/fetal mRNA/protein isoforms accounts for most aspects of the pleiotropic phenotype. To identify aberrant isoforms in skeletal muscle of DM1 and DM2 patients, we performed exon-array profiling and RT-PCR validation on the largest DM sample set to date, including Duchenne, Becker and tibial muscular dystrophy (NMD) patients as disease controls, and non-disease controls. Strikingly, most expression and splicing changes in DM patients were shared with NMD controls. Comparison between DM and NMD identified almost no significant differences. We conclude that DM1 and DM2 are essentially identical for dysregulation of gene expression, and DM expression changes represent a subset of broader spectrum dystrophic changes. We found no evidence for qualitative splicing differences between DM1 and DM2. While some DM-specific splicing differences exist, most of the DM splicing differences were also seen in NMD controls. SSBP3 exon 6 missplicing was observed in all diseased muscle and led to reduced protein. We conclude there is no widespread DM-specific spliceopathy in skeletal muscle and suggest that missplicing in DM (and NMD) may not be the driving mechanism for the muscle pathology, since the same pathways show expression changes unrelated to splicing.
肌强直性营养不良(DM)的流行发病机制模式是,胚胎/胎儿 mRNA/蛋白异构体的异常表达导致了多效表型的大多数方面。为了鉴定 DM1 和 DM2 患者骨骼肌中的异常异构体,我们对迄今为止最大的 DM 样本集进行了外显子数组分析和 RT-PCR 验证,其中包括杜氏肌营养不良症、贝克肌营养不良症和胫骨肌营养不良症(NMD)患者作为疾病对照,以及非疾病对照。引人注目的是,DM 患者的大多数表达和剪接变化与 NMD 对照组共享。DM 与 NMD 之间的比较几乎没有发现显著差异。我们得出结论,DM1 和 DM2 在基因表达的失调方面基本相同,DM 的表达变化代表了更广泛的肌营养不良变化的一个子集。我们没有发现 DM1 和 DM2 之间在剪接方面存在定性差异的证据。虽然存在一些 DM 特有的剪接差异,但大多数 DM 剪接差异也在 NMD 对照组中观察到。在所有患病的肌肉中都观察到 SSBP3 外显子 6 的异常剪接,导致蛋白减少。我们得出结论,在骨骼肌中没有广泛存在的 DM 特异性剪接病,并且提示 DM(和 NMD)中的异常剪接可能不是肌肉病理学的驱动机制,因为相同的途径显示出与剪接无关的表达变化。