Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, United States.
Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM 87106, United States; Departments of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jan;152(1):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
The Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) are the most widely used schizophrenia symptom rating scales, but despite their co-existence for 25 years no easily usable between-scale conversion mechanism exists. The aim of this study was to provide equations for between-scale symptom rating conversions. Two-hundred-and-five schizophrenia patients [mean age±SD=39.5±11.6, 156 males] were assessed with the SANS, SAPS, and PANSS. Pearson's correlations between symptom scores from each of the scales were computed. Linear regression analyses, on data from 176 randomly selected patients, were performed to derive equations for converting ratings between the scales. Intraclass correlations, on data from the remaining 29 patients, not part of the regression analyses, were performed to determine rating conversion accuracy. Between-scale positive and negative symptom ratings were highly correlated. Intraclass correlations between the original positive and negative symptom ratings and those obtained via conversion of alternative ratings using the conversion equations were moderate to high (ICCs=0.65 to 0.91). Regression-based equations may be useful for conversion between schizophrenia symptom severity as measured by the SANS/SAPS and PANSS, though additional validation is warranted. This study's conversion equations, implemented at http:/converteasy.org, may aid in the comparison of medication efficacy studies, in meta- and mega-analyses examining symptoms as moderator variables, and in retrospective combination of symptom data in multi-center data sharing projects that need to pool symptom rating data when such data are obtained using different scales.
《阳性症状评定量表(SAPS)》《阴性症状评定量表(SANS)》和《精神分裂症阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)》是最广泛使用的精神分裂症症状评定量表,但尽管它们共存了 25 年,却没有一个易于使用的量表间转换机制。本研究旨在提供量表间症状评定转换的公式。205 例精神分裂症患者[平均年龄±标准差=39.5±11.6,156 名男性]接受了 SANS、SAPS 和 PANSS 的评估。计算了来自每个量表的症状评分之间的 Pearson 相关系数。对 176 名随机选择的患者的数据进行线性回归分析,得出了在这些量表之间转换评分的公式。对未参与回归分析的 29 名其余患者的数据进行组内相关分析,以确定评分转换的准确性。量表间的阳性和阴性症状评分高度相关。原始阳性和阴性症状评分与使用转换公式转换替代评分获得的评分之间的组内相关系数为中等至高度(ICC=0.65 至 0.91)。基于回归的方程可能有助于 SANS/SAPS 和 PANSS 测量的精神分裂症症状严重程度之间的转换,尽管需要进一步验证。本研究的转换方程,可在 http:/converteasy.org 上实现,可有助于比较药物疗效研究,在作为调节变量的症状的元分析和 mega 分析中,以及在需要汇总症状评分数据的多中心数据共享项目的回顾性组合中,这些项目在使用不同量表时需要汇总症状评分数据。