Cognition and Action Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Amherst, MA, USA ; Neuroscience and Behavior Program, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Amherst, MA, USA.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2013 Nov 29;5:83. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00083. eCollection 2013.
Improvements in motor sequence learning come about via goal-based learning of the sequence of visual stimuli and muscle-based learning of the sequence of movement responses. In young adults, consolidation of goal-based learning is observed after intervals of sleep but not following wake, whereas consolidation of muscle-based learning is greater following intervals with wake compared to sleep. While the benefit of sleep on motor sequence learning has been shown to decline with age, how sleep contributes to consolidation of goal-based vs. muscle-based learning in older adults (OA) has not been disentangled. We trained young (n = 62) and older (n = 50) adults on a motor sequence learning task and re-tested learning following 12 h intervals containing overnight sleep or daytime wake. To probe consolidation of goal-based learning of the sequence, half of the participants were re-tested in a configuration in which the stimulus sequence was the same but, due to a shift in stimulus-response mapping, the movement response sequence differed. To probe consolidation of muscle-based learning, the remaining participants were tested in a configuration in which the stimulus sequence was novel, but now the sequence of movements used for responding was unchanged. In young adults, there was a significant condition (goal-based vs. muscle-based learning) by interval (sleep vs. wake) interaction, F(1,58) = 6.58, p = 0.013: goal-based learning tended to be greater following sleep compared to wake, t(29) = 1.47, p = 0.072. Conversely, muscle-based learning was greater following wake than sleep, t(29) = 2.11, p = 0.021. Unlike young adults, this interaction was not significant in OA, F(1,46) = 0.04, p = 0.84, nor was there a main effect of interval, F(1,46) = 1.14, p = 0.29. Thus, OA do not preferentially consolidate sequence learning over wake or sleep.
运动序列学习的提高是通过基于目标的视觉刺激序列学习和基于肌肉的运动反应序列学习实现的。在年轻成年人中,睡眠间隔后观察到基于目标的学习巩固,而清醒间隔后则没有,而基于肌肉的学习巩固在清醒间隔后比睡眠间隔后更大。虽然睡眠对运动序列学习的益处已被证明随年龄增长而下降,但睡眠如何促进老年成年人(OA)中基于目标的学习与基于肌肉的学习的巩固尚未得到解决。我们在运动序列学习任务中对年轻(n = 62)和老年(n = 50)成年人进行了训练,并在包含整夜睡眠或白天清醒的 12 小时间隔后重新测试了学习情况。为了探究基于目标的序列学习的巩固情况,一半参与者在测试中重新测试了配置,其中刺激序列相同,但由于刺激-反应映射的转变,运动反应序列不同。为了探究基于肌肉的学习巩固情况,其余参与者在测试中使用了新颖的刺激序列,但现在用于响应的运动序列保持不变。在年轻成年人中,存在显著的条件(基于目标的学习与基于肌肉的学习)与间隔(睡眠与清醒)交互作用,F(1,58) = 6.58,p = 0.013:与清醒间隔相比,睡眠间隔后基于目标的学习倾向于更大,t(29) = 1.47,p = 0.072。相反,肌肉学习在清醒间隔后比睡眠间隔后更大,t(29) = 2.11,p = 0.021。与年轻成年人不同,OA 中这种交互作用不显著,F(1,46) = 0.04,p = 0.84,间隔也没有主要影响,F(1,46) = 1.14,p = 0.29。因此,OA 不会在清醒或睡眠时优先巩固序列学习。