Departments of 1Communication Disorders and 2Psychology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):161-70. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a830cf.
The purpose of this study was to examine eye-movement patterns in older and younger adults to identify differences in how they respond to both to-be-attended and to-be-ignored speech.
The study described in this article used an eye-tracking paradigm to provide insight into the factors underlying competing speech understanding in older (n = 23) and younger (n = 22) listeners. Participants attended to a sentence presented in one ear and were instructed to click on a visually displayed word that was heard in that ear while their eye movements were monitored. A foil word also was shown on the screen. Either no sound, steady state noise, or competing speech was presented to the other ear.
Comparisons between younger and older listeners on all three types of indicators measured in this study (percent correct, response time, and eye movement patterns) demonstrated that older adults were more greatly affected by competing speech than were younger adults. Differences between the groups could not be attributed to the presence of hearing loss in the older participants, as performance for all subjects was at ceiling in quiet and none of the performance metrics was significantly associated with degree of hearing loss.
Results of this study support the idea that age-related changes other than lack of audibility or susceptibility to energetic masking negatively affect the ability to understand speech in the presence of a competing message.
本研究旨在通过观察老年人和年轻人的眼动模式,识别他们对需要注意和忽略的言语的反应差异。
本文所描述的研究使用眼动追踪范式,深入了解老年(n=23)和年轻(n=22)听众在竞争言语理解方面的潜在因素。参与者专注于一只耳朵中呈现的句子,并被指示在该耳朵中听到视觉显示的单词时点击该单词,同时监测他们的眼动。屏幕上还显示了一个干扰词。另一只耳朵则呈现无声音、稳态噪声或竞争言语。
在本研究中测量的所有三种指标(正确百分比、反应时间和眼动模式)上,年轻和老年听众之间的比较表明,老年听众受到竞争言语的影响比年轻听众更大。两组之间的差异不能归因于老年参与者的听力损失,因为所有受试者在安静环境下的表现都达到了上限,并且没有任何表现指标与听力损失程度显著相关。
本研究结果支持这样一种观点,即除了可听度或能量掩蔽易感性的丧失之外,与年龄相关的变化会对在竞争信息存在的情况下理解言语的能力产生负面影响。