• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大联邦酒精政策评估及优先建议:来自第三届加拿大酒精政策评价项目的结果。

An assessment of federal alcohol policies in Canada and priority recommendations: Results from the 3rd Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation Project.

机构信息

Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2024 Aug;115(4):640-653. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00889-3. Epub 2024 May 13.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-024-00889-3
PMID:38739320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11303602/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the Canadian federal government's current alcohol policies in relation to public health best practices.

METHODS

The 2022 Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation (CAPE) Project assessed federal alcohol policies across 10 domains. Policy domains were weighted according to evidence for their relative impact, including effectiveness and scope. A detailed scoring rubric of best practices was developed and externally reviewed by international experts. Policy data were collected between June and December 2022, using official legislation, government websites, and data sources identified from previous iterations of CAPE as sources. Contacts within relevant government departments provided any additional data sources, reviewed the accuracy and completeness of the data, and provided amendments as needed. Data were scored independently by members of the research team. Final policy scores were tabulated and presented as a weighted overall average score and as unweighted domain-specific scores.

RESULTS

Compared to public health best practices, the federal government of Canada scored 37% overall. The three most impactful domains-(1) pricing and taxation, (2) marketing and advertising controls, and (3) impaired driving countermeasures-received some of the lowest scores (39%, 10%, and 40%, respectively). Domain-specific scores varied considerably from 0% for minimum legal age policies to 100% for controls on physical availability of alcohol.

CONCLUSION

Many evidence-informed alcohol policies have not been adopted, or been adopted only partially, by the Canadian federal government. Urgent adoption of the recommended policies is needed to prevent and reduce the enormous health, social, and economic costs of alcohol use in Canada.

摘要

目的

系统评估加拿大联邦政府当前与公共卫生最佳实践相关的酒精政策。

方法

2022 年加拿大酒精政策评估 (CAPE) 项目评估了 10 个领域的联邦酒精政策。根据其相对影响(包括有效性和范围)对政策领域进行加权。制定了一个详细的最佳实践评分细则,并由国际专家进行外部审查。政策数据于 2022 年 6 月至 12 月期间收集,使用官方立法、政府网站以及从之前的 CAPE 迭代中确定的数据来源作为来源。相关政府部门的联系人提供了任何其他数据源,审查了数据的准确性和完整性,并在需要时进行了修订。数据由研究团队成员独立评分。最终政策得分被制表并以加权总体平均得分和非加权特定领域得分呈现。

结果

与公共卫生最佳实践相比,加拿大联邦政府总体得分为 37%。三个最具影响力的领域(1)定价和税收、(2)营销和广告控制、(3)酒驾对策,得分最低(分别为 39%、10%和 40%)。特定领域的得分差异很大,最低的是最低法定年龄政策的 0%,最高的是酒精供应控制的 100%。

结论

加拿大联邦政府尚未采纳许多循证酒精政策,或者仅部分采纳。迫切需要采纳建议的政策,以防止和减少加拿大饮酒造成的巨大健康、社会和经济成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb90/11303602/50be8efcae9d/41997_2024_889_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb90/11303602/50be8efcae9d/41997_2024_889_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb90/11303602/50be8efcae9d/41997_2024_889_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An assessment of federal alcohol policies in Canada and priority recommendations: Results from the 3rd Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation Project.加拿大联邦酒精政策评估及优先建议:来自第三届加拿大酒精政策评价项目的结果。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Aug;115(4):640-653. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00889-3. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Government Options to Reduce the Impact of Alcohol on Human Health: Obstacles to Effective Policy Implementation.政府减少酒精对人类健康影响的选择:有效政策实施的障碍。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 19;13(8):2846. doi: 10.3390/nu13082846.
3
The Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation project: Findings from a review of provincial and territorial alcohol policies.加拿大酒精政策评估项目:对省级和地区酒精政策的审查结果。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Sep;40(6):937-945. doi: 10.1111/dar.13251. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
How many alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions could be prevented by alternative pricing and taxation policies? Modelling impacts on alcohol consumption, revenues and related harms in Canada.通过替代性定价和税收政策可以预防多少与酒精相关的死亡和住院?模拟对加拿大酒精消费、收入和相关危害的影响。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Jun;40(5-6):153-164. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.5/6.04.
5
Pricing of alcohol in Canada: A comparison of provincial policies and harm-reduction opportunities.加拿大的酒精定价:省级政策与减少危害机会的比较。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016 May;35(3):289-97. doi: 10.1111/dar.12338. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Analysis of gaps in alcohol policies in Brazil using the Pan American Health Organization's Alcohol Policy Scoring.使用泛美卫生组织的酒精政策评分法分析巴西酒精政策中的差距。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Nov;97:103322. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103322. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
7
What should be done about policy on alcohol pricing and promotions? Australian experts' views of policy priorities: a qualitative interview study.关于酒精定价和促销政策应该采取什么措施?澳大利亚专家对政策重点的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 25;13:610. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-610.
8
Strengthening the Canadian alcohol advertising regulatory system.加强加拿大酒精广告监管体系。
Can J Public Health. 2012 May 24;103(4):e263-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03404232.
9
The Potential Health Impact of an Alcohol Minimum Unit Price in Québec: An Application of the International Model of Alcohol Harms and Policies.魁北克省设定酒精最低单位价格的潜在健康影响:国际酒精危害和政策模型的应用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Sep;81(5):631-640.
10
A historical overview of legislated alcohol policy in the Northern Territory of Australia: 1979-2021.澳大利亚北部地区立法性酒精政策的历史概述:1979-2021 年。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;21(1):1921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11957-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol lobbying in Canada: a quantitative analysis of the federal registry of lobbyists.加拿大的酒精游说活动:对游说者联邦登记册的定量分析。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf141.
2
Provincial and territorial results and recommendations from the Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation project: Room for improvement.加拿大酒精政策评估项目的省级和地区成果与建议:仍有改进空间。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01061-1.
3
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of population-level policies to reduce alcohol use: A systematic umbrella review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation project: Findings from a review of provincial and territorial alcohol policies.加拿大酒精政策评估项目:对省级和地区酒精政策的审查结果。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Sep;40(6):937-945. doi: 10.1111/dar.13251. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Alcohol retail privatisation in Canadian provinces between 2012 and 2017. Is decision making oriented to harm reduction?2012 年至 2017 年期间加拿大各省的酒类零售私有化。决策是否以减少伤害为导向?
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar;40(3):459-467. doi: 10.1111/dar.13229. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
3
Testing Alcohol Labels as a Tool to Communicate Cancer Risk to Drinkers: A Real-World Quasi-Experimental Study.
减少酒精使用的人群层面政策的有效性和成本效益:一项系统性综述。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01013-9.
4
Trend analyses and comparison of characteristics of current-, former- and never-drinkers among young adults in France from 2000 to 2021.2000年至2021年法国年轻人中当前饮酒者、既往饮酒者和从不饮酒者特征的趋势分析与比较。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22405-z.
测试酒精标签作为向饮酒者传达癌症风险的工具:一项真实世界的准实验研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Mar;81(2):249-261. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.249.
4
The Effects of Alcohol Warning Labels on Population Alcohol Consumption: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Alcohol Sales in Yukon, Canada.酒精警示标签对人群酒精消费的影响:对加拿大育空地区酒类销售的中断时间序列分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Mar;81(2):225-237.
5
The Use of Excise Taxes to Reduce Tobacco, Alcohol, and Sugary Beverage Consumption.利用消费税减少烟草、酒精和含糖饮料的消费。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:187-201. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043816. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
New data to support much needed policy change.新数据支持亟需的政策变革。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;5(12):947-948. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30390-0. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
7
"We Have a Right to Know": Exploring Consumer Opinions on Content, Design and Acceptability of Enhanced Alcohol Labels.“我们有权知晓”:探究消费者对强化酒精标签的内容、设计及可接受性的看法。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):20-25. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx068.
8
Assessing the impacts of Saskatchewan's minimum alcohol pricing regulations on alcohol-related crime.评估萨斯喀彻温省最低酒精定价法规对与酒精相关犯罪的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Jul;36(4):492-501. doi: 10.1111/dar.12471. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking.美国酒精政策环境新量表及其与狂饮的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.015.
10
Population-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harm: an overview of systematic reviews.人群层面干预措施减少酒精相关伤害:系统综述概述。
Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):278-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Jun 27.