• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Simultaneous Segmentation and Statistical Label Fusion.同步分割与统计标签融合
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2012 Feb 23;8314:83140Y-. doi: 10.1117/12.910794.
2
Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation.非局部统计标签融合的多图谱分割。
Med Image Anal. 2013 Feb;17(2):194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
3
Characterizing spatially varying performance to improve multi-atlas multi-label segmentation.表征空间变化的性能以改进多图谱多标签分割。
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2011;22:85-96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_8.
4
A transversal approach for patch-based label fusion via matrix completion.一种基于矩阵补全的基于补丁的标签融合横向方法。
Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
5
Robust whole-brain segmentation: application to traumatic brain injury.稳健的全脑分割:在创伤性脑损伤中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2015 Apr;21(1):40-58. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Hierarchical performance estimation in the statistical label fusion framework.统计标签融合框架中的分层性能估计
Med Image Anal. 2014 Oct;18(7):1070-81. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
7
Robust Non-Local Multi-Atlas Segmentation of the Optic Nerve.视神经的稳健非局部多图谱分割
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2013 Mar 13;8669:86691L. doi: 10.1117/12.2007015.
8
A generative probability model of joint label fusion for multi-atlas based brain segmentation.基于多图谱的脑部分割的联合标签融合生成概率模型。
Med Image Anal. 2014 Aug;18(6):881-90. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
9
Discriminative confidence estimation for probabilistic multi-atlas label fusion.概率多图谱标签融合的判别置信估计。
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:274-287. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition.具有多尺度特征表示和特定标签块划分的分层多图谱标签融合
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.025. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation.非局部统计标签融合的多图谱分割。
Med Image Anal. 2013 Feb;17(2):194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning likelihoods for labeling (L3): a general multi-classifier segmentation algorithm.用于标注的学习似然度(L3):一种通用的多分类器分割算法。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 3):322-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_40.
2
Characterizing spatially varying performance to improve multi-atlas multi-label segmentation.表征空间变化的性能以改进多图谱多标签分割。
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2011;22:85-96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_8.
3
Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).基于图谱的分割中的标签融合使用选择性和迭代方法进行性能水平估计 (SIMPLE)。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Dec;29(12):2000-8. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2057442. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
4
A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion.基于标签融合的图像分割生成模型。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct;29(10):1714-29. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2050897. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images.快速且稳健的脑磁共振图像多图谱分割。
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2352-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
6
Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.基于多图谱的脑图像分割:图谱选择及其对准确性的影响。
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 1;46(3):726-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.018. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
7
Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation: application to brain MR data.多图谱图像分割中的组合策略:应用于脑部磁共振数据
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Aug;28(8):1266-77. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2014372. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
8
Adaptive segmentation of MRI data.MRI 数据的自适应分割。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996;15(4):429-42. doi: 10.1109/42.511747.
9
Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults.开放获取影像研究系列(OASIS):年轻、中年、非痴呆及痴呆老年人的横断面MRI数据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1498-507. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498.
10
Unified segmentation.统一分割
Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):839-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018. Epub 2005 Apr 1.

同步分割与统计标签融合

Simultaneous Segmentation and Statistical Label Fusion.

作者信息

Asman Andrew J, Landmana Bennett A

机构信息

Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA 37235.

Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA 37235 ; Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.

出版信息

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2012 Feb 23;8314:83140Y-. doi: 10.1117/12.910794.

DOI:10.1117/12.910794
PMID:24357909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3865243/
Abstract

Labeling or segmentation of structures of interest in medical imaging plays an essential role in both clinical and scientific understanding. Two of the common techniques to obtain these labels are through either fully automated segmentation or through multi-atlas based segmentation and label fusion. Fully automated techniques often result in highly accurate segmentations but lack the robustness to be viable in many cases. On the other hand, label fusion techniques are often extremely robust, but lack the accuracy of automated algorithms for specific classes of problems. Herein, we propose to perform simultaneous automated segmentation and statistical label fusion through the reformulation of a generative model to include a linkage structure that explicitly estimates the complex global relationships between labels and intensities. These relationships are inferred from the atlas labels and intensities and applied to the target using a non-parametric approach. The novelty of this approach lies in the combination of previously exclusive techniques and attempts to combine the accuracy benefits of automated segmentation with the robustness of a multi-atlas based approach. The accuracy benefits of this simultaneous approach are assessed using a multi-label multi- atlas whole-brain segmentation experiment and the segmentation of the highly variable thyroid on computed tomography images. The results demonstrate that this technique has major benefits for certain types of problems and has the potential to provide a paradigm shift in which the lines between statistical label fusion and automated segmentation are dramatically blurred.

摘要

医学成像中感兴趣结构的标记或分割在临床和科学理解方面都起着至关重要的作用。获取这些标记的两种常见技术是通过全自动分割或基于多图谱的分割与标记融合。全自动技术通常能产生高度准确的分割结果,但在许多情况下缺乏可行性所需的稳健性。另一方面,标记融合技术通常极其稳健,但对于特定类型的问题缺乏自动算法的准确性。在此,我们提议通过重新构建生成模型来同时进行自动分割和统计标记融合,该生成模型包含一个明确估计标记与强度之间复杂全局关系的链接结构。这些关系从图谱标记和强度中推断出来,并使用非参数方法应用于目标。这种方法的新颖之处在于将先前相互排斥的技术相结合,并试图将自动分割的准确性优势与基于多图谱方法的稳健性相结合。使用多标签多图谱全脑分割实验以及计算机断层扫描图像上高度可变甲状腺的分割来评估这种同步方法的准确性优势。结果表明,该技术对于某些类型的问题具有重大优势,并且有可能带来一种范式转变,即统计标记融合与自动分割之间的界限将被极大地模糊。