• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入猪生物网片组织病理学反应的比较分析

Comparative analysis of histopathologic responses to implanted porcine biologic meshes.

作者信息

Novitsky Y W, Orenstein S B, Kreutzer D L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA,

出版信息

Hernia. 2014 Oct;18(5):713-21. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1203-7. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-013-1203-7
PMID:24370604
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Biologic mesh (BM) prostheses are increasingly utilized for hernia repairs. Modern BMs are not only derived from different tissue sources, but also undergo various proprietary processing steps-factors that likely impact host tissue responses and mesh performance. We aimed to compare histopathologic responses to various BMs after implantation in a mouse model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five-mm samples of non-crosslinked [Strattice (ST)], and intentionally crosslinked [CollaMend (CM), Permacol (PC)] porcine-derived biologic meshes were implanted subcutaneously in C57BL/6 mice. 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation, meshes were assessed for inflammation, foreign body reaction (FBR), neocellularization, and collagen deposition using H&E and trichrome stains.

RESULTS

All meshes induced early polymorphonuclear cell infiltration (highest in CM; lowest in ST) that resolved by 4 weeks. ST was associated with extensive macrophage presence at 12 weeks. Foreign body response was not seen in the ST group, but was present abundantly in the CM and PC groups, highest at 8 weeks. New peripheral collagen deposition was seen only in the ST group at 12 weeks. Collagen organization was highest in the ST group as well. Both CM and PC groups were associated with fibrous encapsulation and no evidence of integration or remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation appears to be a common component of integration of all biologic meshes studied. Pronounced inflammatory responses as well as profound FBR likely lead to observed encapsulation and poor host integration of the crosslinked BMs. Overall, ST was associated with the lowest foreign body response and the highest degree of new collagen deposition and organization. These features may be key predictors for improved mesh performance during hernia repair.

摘要

目的

生物补片(BM)假体越来越多地用于疝修补术。现代生物补片不仅来源于不同的组织,还经过各种专利加工步骤,这些因素可能会影响宿主组织反应和补片性能。我们旨在比较在小鼠模型中植入各种生物补片后的组织病理学反应。

材料与方法

将5毫米的非交联猪源生物补片[Strattice(ST)]以及经有意交联的猪源生物补片[CollaMend(CM)、Permacol(PC)]皮下植入C57BL/6小鼠体内。植入后1、4、8和12周,使用苏木精-伊红染色和三色染色评估补片的炎症、异物反应(FBR)、新细胞形成和胶原沉积情况。

结果

所有补片均引起早期多形核细胞浸润(CM中最高,ST中最低),4周时消退。ST在12周时伴有大量巨噬细胞。ST组未见异物反应,但CM组和PC组有大量异物反应,8周时最高。仅ST组在12周时可见新的外周胶原沉积。ST组的胶原组织排列也最整齐。CM组和PC组均伴有纤维包裹,无整合或重塑迹象。

结论

炎症似乎是所有研究的生物补片整合的共同组成部分。明显的炎症反应以及严重的异物反应可能导致交联生物补片出现观察到的包裹和宿主整合不良。总体而言,ST的异物反应最低,新胶原沉积和排列程度最高。这些特征可能是疝修补术中补片性能改善的关键预测指标。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of histopathologic responses to implanted porcine biologic meshes.植入猪生物网片组织病理学反应的比较分析
Hernia. 2014 Oct;18(5):713-21. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1203-7. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
2
Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes in vitro.体外猪生物网片激活人单核细胞。
Hernia. 2010 Aug;14(4):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0634-7. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
3
Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice.基于材料、重量和孔径的合成网片在小鼠体内组织病理学效应的比较分析
J Surg Res. 2012 Aug;176(2):423-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.031. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
4
Lack of identifiable biologic behavior in a series of porcine mesh explants.一系列猪网片样本中缺乏可识别的生物学行为。
Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
5
Effects of mast cell modulation on early host response to implanted synthetic meshes.肥大细胞调节对植入合成网片早期宿主反应的影响。
Hernia. 2010 Oct;14(5):511-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0680-1. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
6
Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation.生物补片不比合成补片在腹疝修补术中更优越:一项具有长期随访评估的实验研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3654-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2939-y. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
7
Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair.交联和非交联生物补片在猪腹侧切口疝修补模型中的组织学和生物力学评价。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
8
Long term behavior of biological prostheses used as abdominal wall substitutes.生物假体作为腹壁替代品的长期行为。
Histol Histopathol. 2014 Jan;29(1):139-49. doi: 10.14670/HH-29.139. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
9
Infection susceptibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biological meshes in an experimental contaminated environment.交联和非交联生物网片在实验性污染环境中的感染易感性。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.025. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells modulate the tissue response and mechanical behavior of polyamide mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse repair.人子宫内膜间质干细胞调节聚酰胺网片植入物在盆腔器官脱垂修复中的组织反应和力学行为。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2014 Feb;20(3-4):785-98. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0170. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Collagen Remodeling of Strattice™ Firm in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Abdominal Wall Repair.在非人类灵长类动物腹壁修复模型中Strattice™ Firm的胶原蛋白重塑
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;12(8):796. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080796.
2
The Implant-Induced Foreign Body Response Is Limited by CD13-Dependent Regulation of Ubiquitination of Fusogenic Proteins.植入物诱导的异物反应受CD13依赖性融合蛋白泛素化调节的限制。
J Immunol. 2024 Feb 15;212(4):663-676. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300688.
3
Comparison of mechanical properties and host tissue response to OviTex™ and Strattice™ surgical meshes.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic prostheses for abdominal hernia repair.交联与非交联生物补片在腹外疝修补术中的应用评价。
Hernia. 2012 Feb;16(1):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0859-0. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
2
Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair.交联和非交联生物补片在猪腹侧切口疝修补模型中的组织学和生物力学评价。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
3
Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
比较 OviTex™ 和 Strattice™ 外科补片的机械性能和宿主组织反应。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):987-997. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02769-0. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
4
Techniques for Closing the Abdominal Wall in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: A Systematic Review.肠道和多脏器移植中腹壁关闭技术:一项系统评价
Ann Transplant. 2022 Mar 1;27:e934595. doi: 10.12659/AOT.934595.
5
Human Primary Dermal Fibroblasts Interacting with 3-Dimensional Matrices for Surgical Application Show Specific Growth and Gene Expression Programs.用于手术应用的与人原代真皮成纤维细胞相互作用的 3 维基质显示出特定的生长和基因表达程序。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 7;22(2):526. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020526.
6
Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior.基于细胞外基质的生物材料及其对细胞行为的影响。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jul;48(7):2132-2153. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02408-9. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
7
Biodegradable hyaluronan hydrogel coatings on acellular dermis grafts-A potential strategy to improve biologic graft durability in hernia repair application.脱细胞真皮移植物表面的可生物降解透明质酸水凝胶涂层——一种提高疝修补应用中生物移植物耐久性的潜在策略。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Nov;107(8):2664-2672. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34357. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Performance of biological mesh materials in abdominal wall reconstruction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.生物补片材料在腹壁重建中的应用效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e024091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024091.
9
Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia.可吸收聚甘醇酸与非交联猪源性生物补片在感染性切口疝手术治疗中的应用比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Feb;24(2):435-443. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04095-8. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
"Complex abdominal wall" management: evidence-based guidelines of the Italian Consensus Conference.“复杂性腹壁”管理:意大利共识会议的循证指南。
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):255-272. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0577-6. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
交联与非交联生物补片在猪腹疝修补模型中的早期生物相容性。
Hernia. 2011 Apr;15(2):157-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0770-0. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
4
Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair.交联与非交联猪脱细胞真皮基质在腹疝修补中的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Sep;211(3):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
5
Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes in vitro.体外猪生物网片激活人单核细胞。
Hernia. 2010 Aug;14(4):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0634-7. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
6
Biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction: a critical appraisal.用于腹壁重建的生物补片:批判性评估
Am Surg. 2010 Jan;76(1):1-6.
7
In vitro activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by human biologic meshes.人源生物补片体外激活人外周血单个核细胞。
J Surg Res. 2010 Jan;158(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.033.
8
Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair.用于软组织修复的细胞外基质生物材料。
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009 Oct;26(4):507-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.001.
9
Human monocyte activation by biologic and biodegradable meshes in vitro.体外生物可降解和生物可吸收网片对人单核细胞的激活作用。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):805-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0664-3. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
10
Acellular dermal matrix compared with synthetic implant material for repair of ventral hernia in the setting of peri-operative Staphylococcus aureus implant contamination: a rabbit model.在围手术期金黄色葡萄球菌植入物污染情况下,脱细胞真皮基质与合成植入材料用于修复腹疝的比较:兔模型
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Aug;9(4):433-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.044.