Suppr超能文献

通过降维方法对中心母细胞进行组织病理学图像分析分类。

Histopathological image analysis for centroblasts classification through dimensionality reduction approaches.

机构信息

Informatics and Telematics Institute-Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (ITI-CERTH), Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Cytometry A. 2014 Mar;85(3):242-55. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22432. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

Abstract

We present two novel automated image analysis methods to differentiate centroblast (CB) cells from noncentroblast (non-CB) cells in digital images of H&E-stained tissues of follicular lymphoma. CB cells are often confused by similar looking cells within the tissue, therefore a system to help their classification is necessary. Our methods extract the discriminatory features of cells by approximating the intrinsic dimensionality from the subspace spanned by CB and non-CB cells. In the first method, discriminatory features are approximated with the help of singular value decomposition (SVD), whereas in the second method they are extracted using Laplacian Eigenmaps. Five hundred high-power field images were extracted from 17 slides, which are then used to compose a database of 213 CB and 234 non-CB region of interest images. The recall, precision, and overall accuracy rates of the developed methods were measured and compared with existing classification methods. Moreover, the reproducibility of both classification methods was also examined. The average values of the overall accuracy were 99.22% ± 0.75% and 99.07% ± 1.53% for COB and CLEM, respectively. The experimental results demonstrate that both proposed methods provide better classification accuracy of CB/non-CB in comparison with the state of the art methods.

摘要

我们提出了两种新的自动化图像分析方法,以区分滤泡性淋巴瘤 H&E 染色组织数字图像中的中心母细胞(CB)和非中心母细胞(non-CB)。CB 细胞在组织内常与类似外观的细胞混淆,因此需要一个系统来帮助它们分类。我们的方法通过逼近 CB 和 non-CB 细胞所在子空间的内在维度来提取细胞的判别特征。在第一种方法中,使用奇异值分解(SVD)来逼近判别特征,而在第二种方法中,使用拉普拉斯特征映射来提取判别特征。从 17 张幻灯片中提取了 500 个高倍视野图像,然后将其用于组成包含 213 个 CB 和 234 个非 CB 感兴趣区域图像的数据库。测量并比较了开发的方法与现有分类方法的召回率、精度和总体准确率。此外,还检查了两种分类方法的可重复性。COB 和 CLEM 的总体准确率平均值分别为 99.22%±0.75%和 99.07%±1.53%。实验结果表明,与现有方法相比,这两种方法都能提供更好的 CB/non-CB 分类准确率。

相似文献

5
Incremental linear discriminant analysis for face recognition.用于人脸识别的增量线性判别分析。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2008 Feb;38(1):210-21. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.908870.
9

引用本文的文献

4
Digital pathology and artificial intelligence.数字病理学与人工智能。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):e253-e261. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8.
5
T-Cell Clustering in Neoplastic Follicles of Follicular Lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤肿瘤性滤泡中的T细胞聚集
Cancer Microenviron. 2018 Dec;11(2-3):135-140. doi: 10.1007/s12307-018-0217-1. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

4
Histopathological image analysis: a review.组织病理学图像分析:综述。
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;2:147-71. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2009.2034865. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
10
Imaging mass spectrometry analysis for follicular lymphoma grading.用于滤泡性淋巴瘤分级的成像质谱分析
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:6969-72. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333850.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验