Stewart Philip S
Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Pathog Dis. 2014 Apr;70(3):212-8. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12118. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
This article examines a likely basis of the tenacity of biofilm infections that has received relatively little attention: the resistance of biofilms to mechanical clearance. One way that a biofilm infection persists is by withstanding the flow of fluid or other mechanical forces that work to wash or sweep microorganisms out of the body. The fundamental criterion for mechanical persistence is that the biofilm failure strength exceeds the external applied stress. Mechanical failure of the biofilm and release of planktonic microbial cells is also important in vivo because it can result in dissemination of infection. The fundamental criterion for detachment and dissemination is that the applied stress exceeds the biofilm failure strength. The apparent contradiction for a biofilm to both persist and disseminate is resolved by recognizing that biofilm material properties are inherently heterogeneous. There are also mechanical aspects to the ways that infectious biofilms evade leukocyte phagocytosis. The possibility of alternative therapies for treating biofilm infections that work by reducing biofilm cohesion could (1) allow prevailing hydrodynamic shear to remove biofilm, (2) increase the efficacy of designed interventions for removing biofilms, (3) enable phagocytic engulfment of softened biofilm aggregates, and (4) improve phagocyte mobility and access to biofilm.
本文探讨了生物膜感染顽固性的一个可能原因,而这一原因相对较少受到关注:生物膜对机械清除的抗性。生物膜感染持续存在的一种方式是抵抗流体流动或其他机械力,这些力量会将微生物冲出体外。生物膜机械持久性的基本标准是生物膜的破坏强度超过外部施加的应力。生物膜的机械破坏和浮游微生物细胞的释放在体内也很重要,因为这可能导致感染扩散。生物膜脱离和扩散的基本标准是施加的应力超过生物膜的破坏强度。认识到生物膜材料特性本质上是异质的,就解决了生物膜既能持续存在又能扩散这一明显矛盾。传染性生物膜逃避白细胞吞噬作用的方式也存在机械方面的因素。通过降低生物膜凝聚力来治疗生物膜感染的替代疗法可能具有以下作用:(1)使现有的流体动力剪切力能够清除生物膜;(2)提高设计的生物膜清除干预措施的效果;(3)使软化的生物膜聚集体能够被吞噬细胞吞噬;(4)改善吞噬细胞的移动性以及对生物膜的接触。