Suppr超能文献

局部用驱虫剂会在社区内驱赶蚊子吗?局部用驱虫剂作为预防蚊虫叮咬工具对健康公平性的影响。

Do topical repellents divert mosquitoes within a community? Health equity implications of topical repellents as a mosquito bite prevention tool.

作者信息

Maia Marta Ferreira, Onyango Sangoro Peter, Thele Max, Simfukwe Emmanuel Titus, Turner Elizabeth Louise, Moore Sarah Jane

机构信息

Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Basel, Switzerland ; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ; Ifakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Bagamoyo, Pwani Region, United Republic of Tanzania.

Ifakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Bagamoyo, Pwani Region, United Republic of Tanzania ; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Disease Control, London, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e84875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084875. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Repellents do not kill mosquitoes--they simply reduce human-vector contact. Thus it is possible that individuals who do not use repellents but dwell close to repellent users experience more bites than otherwise. The objective of this study was to measure if diversion occurs from households that use repellents to those that do not use repellents.

METHODS

The study was performed in three Tanzanian villages using 15%-DEET and placebo lotions. All households were given LLINs. Three coverage scenarios were investigated: complete coverage (all households were given 15%-DEET), incomplete coverage (80% of households were given 15%-DEET and 20% placebo) and no coverage (all households were given placebo). A crossover study design was used and coverage scenarios were rotated weekly over a period of ten weeks. The placebo lotion was randomly allocated to households in the incomplete coverage scenario. The level of compliance was reported to be close to 100%. Mosquito densities were measured through aspiration of resting mosquitoes. Data were analysed using negative binomial regression models.

FINDINGS

Repellent-users had consistently fewer mosquitoes in their dwellings. In villages where everybody had been given 15%-DEET, resting mosquito densities were fewer than half that of households in the no coverage scenario (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]=0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.60); p<0.001). Placebo-users living in a village where 80% of the households used 15%-DEET were likely to have over four-times more mosquitoes (IRR=4.17; 95% CI: 3.08-5.65; p<0.001) resting in their dwellings in comparison to households in a village where nobody uses repellent.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that high coverage of repellent use could significantly reduce man-vector contact but with incomplete coverage evidence suggests that mosquitoes are diverted from households that use repellent to those that do not. Therefore, if repellents are to be considered for vector control, strategies to maximise coverage are required.

摘要

目的

驱蚊剂并不杀死蚊子——它们只是减少人与病媒的接触。因此,不使用驱蚊剂但居住在使用驱蚊剂的人附近的个体有可能比其他情况更容易被叮咬。本研究的目的是衡量是否存在从使用驱蚊剂的家庭向不使用驱蚊剂的家庭的蚊子转移情况。

方法

该研究在坦桑尼亚的三个村庄进行,使用15%避蚊胺和安慰剂乳液。所有家庭都发放了长效驱虫蚊帐。研究了三种覆盖情况:完全覆盖(所有家庭都发放15%避蚊胺)、不完全覆盖(80%的家庭发放15%避蚊胺,20%发放安慰剂)和无覆盖(所有家庭都发放安慰剂)。采用交叉研究设计,覆盖情况在十周内每周轮换一次。在不完全覆盖情况下,安慰剂乳液被随机分配给家庭。据报告依从性水平接近100%。通过抽吸静止蚊子来测量蚊子密度。使用负二项回归模型分析数据。

研究结果

使用驱蚊剂的人居住场所内的蚊子一直较少。在所有人都被发放15%避蚊胺的村庄,静止蚊子密度不到无覆盖情况下家庭的一半(发病率比[IRR]=0.39(95%置信区间[CI]:0.25 - 0.60);p<0.001)。与无人使用驱蚊剂的村庄中的家庭相比,居住在80%的家庭使用15%避蚊胺的村庄中的安慰剂使用者居住场所内静止的蚊子可能多出四倍以上(IRR=4.17;95%CI:3.08 - 5.65;p<0.001)。

结论

有证据表明,高覆盖率使用驱蚊剂可显著减少人与病媒的接触,但在覆盖率不完全的情况下,有证据表明蚊子会从不使用驱蚊剂的家庭转移到使用驱蚊剂的家庭。因此,如果要考虑将驱蚊剂用于病媒控制,就需要采取策略来最大限度地提高覆盖率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/3869929/184b0c9210fc/pone.0084875.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验