Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Malar J. 2023 Mar 6;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04500-x.
As many countries aim to eliminate malaria, use of comprehensive approaches targeting the mosquito vector and environment are needed. Integrated malaria prevention advocates the use of several malaria prevention measures holistically at households and in the community. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and summarize the impact of integrated malaria prevention in low- and middle-income countries on malaria burden.
Literature on integrated malaria prevention, defined as the use of two or more malaria prevention methods holistically, was searched from 1st January 2001 to 31st July 2021. The primary outcome variables were malaria incidence and prevalence, while the secondary outcome measures were human biting and entomological inoculation rates, and mosquito mortality.
A total of 10,931 studies were identified by the search strategy. After screening, 57 articles were included in the review. Studies included cluster randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies, programme evaluations, experimental hut/houses, and field trials. Various interventions were used, mainly combinations of two or three malaria prevention methods including insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), topical repellents, insecticide sprays, microbial larvicides, and house improvements including screening, insecticide-treated wall hangings, and screening of eaves. The most common methods used in integrated malaria prevention were ITNs and IRS, followed by ITNs and topical repellents. There was reduced incidence and prevalence of malaria when multiple malaria prevention methods were used compared to single methods. Mosquito human biting and entomological inoculation rates were significantly reduced, and mosquito mortality increased in use of multiple methods compared to single interventions. However, a few studies showed mixed results or no benefits of using multiple methods to prevent malaria.
Use of multiple malaria prevention methods was effective in reducing malaria infection and mosquito density in comparison with single methods. Results from this systematic review can be used to inform future research, practice, policy and programming for malaria control in endemic countries.
随着许多国家努力消除疟疾,需要采用针对蚊子媒介和环境的综合方法。综合疟疾预防提倡在家庭和社区中全面使用几种疟疾预防措施。本系统评价的目的是整理和总结在中低收入国家综合疟疾预防对疟疾负担的影响。
从 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日,搜索了有关综合疟疾预防(定义为综合使用两种或两种以上疟疾预防方法)的文献。主要结局变量是疟疾发病率和患病率,次要结局测量指标是人类叮咬和昆虫接种率以及蚊子死亡率。
通过搜索策略共确定了 10931 项研究。经过筛选,有 57 篇文章纳入了综述。研究包括集群随机对照试验、纵向研究、方案评估、实验小屋/房屋和现场试验。使用了各种干预措施,主要是两种或三种疟疾预防方法的组合,包括经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)、室内滞留喷洒(IRS)、局部驱虫剂、杀虫剂喷雾、微生物幼虫剂和房屋改善,包括筛网、经杀虫剂处理的壁挂和屋檐筛网。综合疟疾预防中最常用的方法是 ITN 和 IRS,其次是 ITN 和局部驱虫剂。与单一方法相比,使用多种疟疾预防方法可降低疟疾发病率和患病率。与单一干预措施相比,蚊子的人叮咬和昆虫接种率显著降低,蚊子死亡率增加。然而,一些研究显示出混合结果或使用多种方法预防疟疾没有好处。
与单一方法相比,使用多种疟疾预防方法可有效降低疟疾感染和蚊子密度。本系统评价的结果可用于为流行国家的未来疟疾控制研究、实践、政策和规划提供信息。