Blankenship G W
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:967-1003.
The effects of PRP with red krypton laser are essentially identical to those produced with blue-green argon laser. Burns of the rabbit retina produced with these two different lasers are almost the same. In a prospective and randomized clinical trial of proliferative diabetic retinopathy treatment there was no significant difference between PRP using these two different lasers. The characteristic changes of rabbit fundi 3, 7, and 30 days after PRP with red krypton laser were almost the same as those following blue-green argon laser. Both types of treatment frequently produced small vitreous hemorrhages and exudative retinal detachments, but choroidal thickening occurred more frequently with argon treatment. These changes were transient and had resolved within 30 days of treatment. The microscopic changes consisted of pigment epithelial disruption with pigment migration into the retina, heat coagulation of the photoreceptors, disruption of the outer and inner nuclear layers with atrophy of the nuclei, and temporary swelling of the nerve fiber layer. The untreated retina and choroid between burns was not involved and appeared normal at each period. Thirty days after treatment, the scarring produced by these two types of burns was identical. Seventy-one eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy having three or four retinopathy risk factors were treated with panretinal laser photocoagulation, and followed in a prospective study for 6 months. Thirty-six eyes were randomly selected for blue-green argon treatment, and 35 were randomly selected for red krypton treatment. The incidence of undesired side effects during the first 2 weeks following treatment was almost identical between the two groups. However, by 1 month the majority of eyes in both groups had visual acuities equal to or better than the pretreatment acuities and complete regression of NVD. Six months after treatment, the majority of eyes in both groups continued to have visual acuities equal to or better than the pretreatment acuities with fewer cases having larger losses of vision in the krypton treated group. Loss of peripheral visual field was equal with the two types of treatment having a minimal decrease with the IV-4e isopter, but substantial loss with the I-4e isopter. Additional vitreous hemorrhage rarely occurred in either group, but was slightly more frequent in those treated with krypton. Complete regression was accomplished in most eyes with pretreatment disc and/or NVE in both groups, but persistence of neovascularization was more frequent in those treated with krypton. Overall, the wavelength used seemingly had little effect on the result.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
富血小板血浆联合红色氪激光的效果与蓝绿色氩激光产生的效果基本相同。用这两种不同激光造成的兔视网膜烧伤几乎一样。在一项增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变治疗的前瞻性随机临床试验中,使用这两种不同激光进行全视网膜光凝治疗并无显著差异。用红色氪激光进行全视网膜光凝治疗后3天、7天和30天兔眼底的特征性变化与蓝绿色氩激光治疗后的变化几乎相同。两种治疗方式均常出现小的玻璃体出血和渗出性视网膜脱离,但氩激光治疗后脉络膜增厚更常见。这些变化是暂时的,在治疗后30天内消退。显微镜下变化包括色素上皮破坏伴色素迁移至视网膜、光感受器热凝固、外核层和内核层破坏伴细胞核萎缩以及神经纤维层暂时肿胀。烧伤之间未治疗的视网膜和脉络膜未受累,在每个时期均表现正常。治疗30天后,这两种烧伤产生的瘢痕相同。对71只患有增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变且有三或四个视网膜病变危险因素的眼睛进行了全视网膜激光光凝治疗,并在前瞻性研究中随访6个月。随机选择36只眼睛接受蓝绿色氩激光治疗,35只眼睛接受红色氪激光治疗。两组治疗后前2周内不良副作用的发生率几乎相同。然而,到1个月时,两组中的大多数眼睛视力等于或优于治疗前,且新生血管性青光眼完全消退。治疗6个月后,两组中的大多数眼睛视力仍等于或优于治疗前,氪激光治疗组中视力损失较大的病例较少。两种治疗方式导致的周边视野丧失相同,IV - 4e等视线处视野丧失最小,但I - 4e等视线处视野有大量丧失。两组中额外的玻璃体出血均很少发生,但氪激光治疗的患者略为常见。两组中大多数有治疗前视盘和/或新生血管性视网膜病变的眼睛实现了完全消退,但氪激光治疗的患者新生血管化持续存在的情况更常见。总体而言,所使用的波长似乎对结果影响不大。(摘要截选至400字)