Borgmann S, Schwab F, Santibanez S, Mankertz A
Synlab Medical Care Services,Medical Care Centre Weiden,Weiden,Germany.
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine,Charité - University Medicine Berlin,Berlin,Germany.
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Nov;142(11):2388-96. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813003427. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Mumps outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations with genotype G have been reported repeatedly. Detection of these outbreaks can be difficult in a setting with relatively high vaccination coverage when acute cases of mumps are routinely diagnosed by IgM serology since this marker is not reliable for diagnosis of mumps re-infection. To learn whether diagnostic tests performed in a large private laboratory may be useful to detect mumps outbreaks retrospectively, we reviewed the results of almost 7000 mumps tests. Two groups were compared: group 1 comprised of 3438 samples from patients submitted by physicians and clinicians (it was assumed that these patients visited their doctor due to acute disease). Group 2 comprised of 3398 samples submitted from company medical officers and occupational physicians. Since these patients usually attend for routine check-ups and certification of immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases, these samples comprised a control group. From July 2010 to May 2011, a mumps virus outbreak with more than 300 cases occurred in Bavaria, Southeast Germany. Our study includes samples received for serological mumps tests from January 2009 until December 2011 (36 months). The two groups were analysed with regard to the number of IgM-positive cases per month and the level of IgG titre. We found a marked increase for both parameters in group 1 during the time of the outbreak, while the samples submitted by the occupational medical physicians did not display significant alterations. These parameters reflect the outbreak with high accuracy, indicating that a retrospective analysis of IgG titres may be a useful tool for detection of mumps outbreaks when, as was the case in Germany, (i) a nationwide notification system has not been implemented and (ii) a highly vaccinated population is affected.
在高疫苗接种率人群中,已多次报告基因型G的腮腺炎暴发。在疫苗接种覆盖率相对较高的情况下,当腮腺炎急性病例通过IgM血清学常规诊断时,检测这些暴发可能很困难,因为该标志物对腮腺炎再次感染的诊断不可靠。为了了解在一家大型私人实验室进行的诊断测试是否有助于回顾性检测腮腺炎暴发,我们回顾了近7000例腮腺炎检测结果。比较了两组:第1组由医生和临床医生提交的3438例患者样本组成(假定这些患者因急性疾病就医)。第2组由公司医务人员和职业医生提交的3398例样本组成。由于这些患者通常是为了进行常规检查和疫苗可预防疾病免疫认证而来,这些样本构成了一个对照组。2010年7月至2011年5月,德国东南部巴伐利亚州发生了一起超过300例的腮腺炎病毒暴发。我们的研究包括2009年1月至2011年12月(36个月)期间接受血清学腮腺炎检测的样本。分析了两组每月IgM阳性病例数和IgG滴度水平。我们发现,在暴发期间,第1组的这两个参数均显著增加,而职业医生提交的样本未显示出显著变化。这些参数能非常准确地反映暴发情况,表明当(如德国的情况)(i)未实施全国性通报系统且(ii)受影响人群疫苗接种率很高时,回顾性分析IgG滴度可能是检测腮腺炎暴发的有用工具。