Suppr超能文献

公共交通巴士司机分心的流行率及相关因素。

Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers.

机构信息

a Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):720-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.867482.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent research has suggested that driver distraction is a major cause of driving performance impairment and motor vehicle collisions. Research on the topic has focused on passenger vehicles, with studies suggesting that drivers may be distracted nearly 33 percent of the time spent driving. To date, no study has examined the prevalence of distraction specifically among public transit bus drivers.

METHODS

Over a 3-month period, trained investigators observed and recorded distraction behaviors of bus drivers. Distraction prevalence was compared by route characteristics (e.g., geographic area, travel speed) using chi-square test. A general estimating equation logistic regression was used to estimate P values for distraction prevalence by driver demographics.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a 39 percent prevalence of distraction. The most prevalent distractions were due to interactions with another passenger. Distractions were more prevalent among drivers <30 years of age or ≥ 50 years of age, on city streets or highways (relative to residential streets), and when there were more than 20 passengers. Distractions were the least prevalent in suburban areas, with the highest prevalence observed in city centers and rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Driver distraction is a common problem for public transit bus drivers, mainly due to other passengers. Drivers should be educated on the hazards of distracted driving and on ways to avoid distraction.

摘要

目的

最近的研究表明,驾驶员分神是驾驶表现受损和机动车碰撞的一个主要原因。该主题的研究集中在乘用车上,研究表明驾驶员在驾驶过程中可能有近 33%的时间处于分神状态。迄今为止,尚无研究专门检查公共汽车司机分心的发生率。

方法

在 3 个月的时间里,经过培训的调查员观察并记录了公交车司机的分神行为。使用卡方检验比较了路线特征(如地理区域、行驶速度)对分神发生率的影响。使用一般估计方程逻辑回归估计了驾驶员人口统计学特征对分神发生率的 P 值。

结果

总体而言,分心的发生率为 39%。最常见的分神原因是与其他乘客的互动。30 岁以下或 50 岁以上的司机、在城市街道或高速公路上(相对于住宅区)、有 20 多名乘客的司机中,分神现象更为普遍。在郊区,分神现象最少见,在市中心和农村地区观察到的分神现象最多。

结论

驾驶员分神是公共汽车司机的一个常见问题,主要是由于其他乘客造成的。应该对驾驶员进行分心驾驶的危害以及避免分心的方法进行教育。

相似文献

4
Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?儿童乘客是否是驾驶分心的重要来源?
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):1236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
5
Passenger distractions among adolescent drivers.青少年驾驶员中的乘客干扰因素。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(4):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
7
The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.分心对青少年驾驶员撞车类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
9
Conflicts between bus drivers and passengers in Changsha, China.中国长沙的公交车司机与乘客之间的冲突。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 May;169:106623. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106623. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
A roadside study of observable driver distractions.一项关于可观察到的驾驶员分心情况的路边研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(6):552-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.989319. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

3
Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?免提电话比手持电话更安全吗?
J Safety Res. 2009;40(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
5
A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance.关于手机对驾驶员表现影响的荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1282-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
9
The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.分心对青少年驾驶员撞车类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
10
Effects of driver cell-phone use on driver aggression.驾驶员使用手机对其攻击性的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;146(2):133-46. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.2.133-146.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验