• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共交通巴士司机分心的流行率及相关因素。

Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers.

机构信息

a Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):720-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.867482.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2013.867482
PMID:24433192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4391701/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent research has suggested that driver distraction is a major cause of driving performance impairment and motor vehicle collisions. Research on the topic has focused on passenger vehicles, with studies suggesting that drivers may be distracted nearly 33 percent of the time spent driving. To date, no study has examined the prevalence of distraction specifically among public transit bus drivers.

METHODS

Over a 3-month period, trained investigators observed and recorded distraction behaviors of bus drivers. Distraction prevalence was compared by route characteristics (e.g., geographic area, travel speed) using chi-square test. A general estimating equation logistic regression was used to estimate P values for distraction prevalence by driver demographics.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a 39 percent prevalence of distraction. The most prevalent distractions were due to interactions with another passenger. Distractions were more prevalent among drivers <30 years of age or ≥ 50 years of age, on city streets or highways (relative to residential streets), and when there were more than 20 passengers. Distractions were the least prevalent in suburban areas, with the highest prevalence observed in city centers and rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Driver distraction is a common problem for public transit bus drivers, mainly due to other passengers. Drivers should be educated on the hazards of distracted driving and on ways to avoid distraction.

摘要

目的

最近的研究表明,驾驶员分神是驾驶表现受损和机动车碰撞的一个主要原因。该主题的研究集中在乘用车上,研究表明驾驶员在驾驶过程中可能有近 33%的时间处于分神状态。迄今为止,尚无研究专门检查公共汽车司机分心的发生率。

方法

在 3 个月的时间里,经过培训的调查员观察并记录了公交车司机的分神行为。使用卡方检验比较了路线特征(如地理区域、行驶速度)对分神发生率的影响。使用一般估计方程逻辑回归估计了驾驶员人口统计学特征对分神发生率的 P 值。

结果

总体而言,分心的发生率为 39%。最常见的分神原因是与其他乘客的互动。30 岁以下或 50 岁以上的司机、在城市街道或高速公路上(相对于住宅区)、有 20 多名乘客的司机中,分神现象更为普遍。在郊区,分神现象最少见,在市中心和农村地区观察到的分神现象最多。

结论

驾驶员分神是公共汽车司机的一个常见问题,主要是由于其他乘客造成的。应该对驾驶员进行分心驾驶的危害以及避免分心的方法进行教育。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers.公共交通巴士司机分心的流行率及相关因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):720-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.867482.
2
The prevalence of distraction among passenger vehicle drivers: a roadside observational approach.乘用车驾驶员分心行为的流行率:一种路边观察方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(2):140-6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.916797. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
3
Distraction 'on the buses': a novel framework of ergonomics methods for identifying sources and effects of bus driver distraction.分散在公车上的注意力:一种用于识别公交车驾驶员注意力分散源和影响的新型人机工程学方法框架。
Appl Ergon. 2011 May;42(4):602-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
4
Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?儿童乘客是否是驾驶分心的重要来源?
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):1236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
5
Passenger distractions among adolescent drivers.青少年驾驶员中的乘客干扰因素。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(4):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
6
Potential distractions and unsafe driving behaviors among drivers of 1- to 12-year-old children.1至12岁儿童驾驶员的潜在干扰因素和不安全驾驶行为。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.02.010.
7
The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.分心对青少年驾驶员撞车类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
8
Child passengers and driver culpability in fatal crashes by driver gender.按驾驶员性别划分的致命撞车事故中儿童乘客与驾驶员的罪责情况
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Jul 3;17(5):447-53. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1104415. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
9
Conflicts between bus drivers and passengers in Changsha, China.中国长沙的公交车司机与乘客之间的冲突。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 May;169:106623. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106623. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
A roadside study of observable driver distractions.一项关于可观察到的驾驶员分心情况的路边研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(6):552-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.989319. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-sensor movement analysis for transport safety and health applications.多传感器运动分析在运输安全与健康领域的应用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0210090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210090. eCollection 2019.
2
Working Conditions, Job Strain, and Traffic Safety among Three Groups of Public Transport Drivers.三类公共交通司机的工作条件、工作压力与交通安全
Saf Health Work. 2018 Dec;9(4):454-461. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
Relationship Between the Incidence of Road Traffic Accidents, Psychological Characteristics, and Genotype in Bus Drivers in a Chinese Population.中国人群中公交司机道路交通事故发生率、心理特征与基因型的关系。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 10;24:5566-5572. doi: 10.12659/MSM.909245.

本文引用的文献

1
An assessment of commercial motor vehicle driver distraction using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据评估商用车辆驾驶员的分心情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(6):612-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.683841.
2
Risk factors associated with bus accident severity in the United States: a generalized ordered logit model.与美国公共汽车事故严重程度相关的风险因素:广义有序逻辑模型。
J Safety Res. 2012 Jul;43(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
3
Is a hands-free phone safer than a handheld phone?免提电话比手持电话更安全吗?
J Safety Res. 2009;40(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
4
Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.模拟驾驶中的乘客与手机通话。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):392-400. doi: 10.1037/a0013119.
5
A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance.关于手机对驾驶员表现影响的荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1282-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
6
The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers.驾驶员注意力分散对青少年驾驶员及其乘客受伤严重程度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
7
The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver.乘客因素与使用手机因素对导致驾驶员前往医院就诊的机动车碰撞事故的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Nov;39(6):1170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
8
The prevalence of, and factors associated with, serious crashes involving a distracting activity.涉及分散注意力活动的严重撞车事故的发生率及相关因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 May;39(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
9
The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.分心对青少年驾驶员撞车类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 22.
10
Effects of driver cell-phone use on driver aggression.驾驶员使用手机对其攻击性的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;146(2):133-46. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.2.133-146.