Suppr超能文献

Whatman FTA 滤膜基质技术提取后 DNA 测序和表型试验在鉴别白念珠菌和杜伯念珠菌中的作用。

The usefulness of DNA sequencing after extraction by Whatman FTA filter matrix technology and phenotypic tests for differentiation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Mycopathologia. 2014 Feb;177(1-2):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s11046-014-9728-6. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

Abstract

Since C. dubliniensis is similar to C. albicans phenotypically, it can be misidentified as C. albicans. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of C. dubliniensis among isolates previously identified as C. albicans in our stocks and to compare the phenotypic methods and DNA sequencing of D1/D2 region on the ribosomal large subunit (rLSU) gene. A total of 850 isolates included in this study. Phenotypic identification was performed based on germ tube formation, chlamydospore production, colony colors on chromogenic agar, inability of growth at 45 °C and growth on hypertonic Sabouraud dextrose agar. Eighty isolates compatible with C. dubliniensis by at least one phenotypic test were included in the sequence analysis. Nested PCR amplification of D1/D2 region of the rLSU gene was performed after the fungal DNA extraction by Whatman FTA filter paper technology. The sequencing analysis of PCR products carried out by an automated capillary gel electrophoresis device. The rate of C. dubliniensis was 2.35 % (n = 20) among isolates previously described as C. albicans. Consequently, none of the phenotypic tests provided satisfactory performance alone in our study, and molecular methods required special equipment and high cost. Thus, at least two phenotypic methods can be used for identification of C. dubliniensis, and molecular methods can be used for confirmation.

摘要

由于 C. dubliniensis 在表型上与 C. albicans 相似,因此它可能被错误鉴定为 C. albicans。我们旨在调查在我们的库存中以前被鉴定为 C. albicans 的分离物中 C. dubliniensis 的流行率,并比较核糖体大亚基 (rLSU) 基因上 D1/D2 区域的表型方法和 DNA 测序。这项研究共包括 850 株分离物。表型鉴定基于芽管形成、厚垣孢子产生、显色琼脂上的菌落颜色、45°C 下不能生长和高渗萨布罗琼脂上的生长。通过至少一种表型试验与 C. dubliniensis 相兼容的 80 株分离物被纳入序列分析。通过 Whatman FTA 滤纸技术提取真菌 DNA 后,进行 rLSU 基因的 D1/D2 区域的巢式 PCR 扩增。通过自动化毛细管凝胶电泳设备对 PCR 产物进行测序分析。在以前描述为 C. albicans 的分离物中,C. dubliniensis 的比率为 2.35%(n = 20)。因此,在我们的研究中,没有一种表型试验单独提供令人满意的性能,而分子方法需要特殊设备和高成本。因此,至少可以使用两种表型方法来鉴定 C. dubliniensis,并且可以使用分子方法进行确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验