Rusch Michelle L, Schall Mark C, Gavin Patrick, Lee John D, Dawson Jeffrey D, Vecera Shaun, Rizzo Matthew
University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Neurology Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242.
University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Neurology Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013 Jan;16:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.007.
This simulator study evaluated the effects of augmented reality (AR) cues designed to direct the attention of experienced drivers to roadside hazards. Twenty-seven healthy middle-aged licensed drivers with a range of attention capacity participated in a 54 mile (1.5 hour) drive in an interactive fixed-base driving simulator. Each participant received AR cues to potential roadside hazards in six simulated straight (9 mile long) rural roadway segments. Drivers were evaluated on response time for detecting a potentially hazardous event, detection accuracy for target (hazard) and non-target objects, and headway with respect to the hazards. Results showed no negative outcomes associated with interference. AR cues did not impair perception of non-target objects, including for drivers with lower attentional capacity. Results showed near significant response time benefits for AR cued hazards. AR cueing increased response rate for detecting pedestrians and warning signs but not vehicles. AR system false alarms and misses did not impair driver responses to potential hazards.
这项模拟器研究评估了增强现实(AR)提示对引导经验丰富的驾驶员注意路边危险的效果。27名具有不同注意力水平的健康中年持证驾驶员参与了在交互式固定基座驾驶模拟器中进行的54英里(1.5小时)驾驶。每位参与者在六个模拟的直道(9英里长)农村道路路段中接收有关潜在路边危险的AR提示。对驾驶员检测潜在危险事件的反应时间、对目标(危险)和非目标物体的检测准确性以及与危险相关的车间距进行了评估。结果显示没有与干扰相关的负面结果。AR提示并未损害对非目标物体的感知,包括注意力较低的驾驶员。结果显示,对于AR提示的危险,反应时间有接近显著的益处。AR提示提高了检测行人及警告标志的反应率,但对车辆没有效果。AR系统的误报和漏报并未损害驾驶员对潜在危险的反应。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013-1
Hum Factors. 2013-6
Accid Anal Prev. 2014-10
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021-12-20
Front Robot AI. 2018-4-17
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-9-28
Front Psychol. 2019-7-31
Accid Anal Prev. 2016-10
Vis cogn. 2015-7-3
Accid Anal Prev. 2014-10
Hum Factors. 2013-6
Hum Factors. 2013-6
Vision Res. 2011-3-25
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010-11
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010-10
Accid Anal Prev. 2010-2-20
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009-4
Hum Factors. 2007-12