Suppr超能文献

利用增强现实提示引导驾驶员注意力。

Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

作者信息

Rusch Michelle L, Schall Mark C, Gavin Patrick, Lee John D, Dawson Jeffrey D, Vecera Shaun, Rizzo Matthew

机构信息

University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Neurology Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242.

University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Neurology Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242

出版信息

Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013 Jan;16:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.007.

Abstract

This simulator study evaluated the effects of augmented reality (AR) cues designed to direct the attention of experienced drivers to roadside hazards. Twenty-seven healthy middle-aged licensed drivers with a range of attention capacity participated in a 54 mile (1.5 hour) drive in an interactive fixed-base driving simulator. Each participant received AR cues to potential roadside hazards in six simulated straight (9 mile long) rural roadway segments. Drivers were evaluated on response time for detecting a potentially hazardous event, detection accuracy for target (hazard) and non-target objects, and headway with respect to the hazards. Results showed no negative outcomes associated with interference. AR cues did not impair perception of non-target objects, including for drivers with lower attentional capacity. Results showed near significant response time benefits for AR cued hazards. AR cueing increased response rate for detecting pedestrians and warning signs but not vehicles. AR system false alarms and misses did not impair driver responses to potential hazards.

摘要

这项模拟器研究评估了增强现实(AR)提示对引导经验丰富的驾驶员注意路边危险的效果。27名具有不同注意力水平的健康中年持证驾驶员参与了在交互式固定基座驾驶模拟器中进行的54英里(1.5小时)驾驶。每位参与者在六个模拟的直道(9英里长)农村道路路段中接收有关潜在路边危险的AR提示。对驾驶员检测潜在危险事件的反应时间、对目标(危险)和非目标物体的检测准确性以及与危险相关的车间距进行了评估。结果显示没有与干扰相关的负面结果。AR提示并未损害对非目标物体的感知,包括注意力较低的驾驶员。结果显示,对于AR提示的危险,反应时间有接近显著的益处。AR提示提高了检测行人及警告标志的反应率,但对车辆没有效果。AR系统的误报和漏报并未损害驾驶员对潜在危险的反应。

相似文献

1
Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013 Jan;16:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.007.
2
Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception.
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):643-58. doi: 10.1177/0018720812462029.
3
Augmented reality cues to assist older drivers with gap estimation for left-turns.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Oct;71:210-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Assessing Distraction Potential of Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays for Vehicle Drivers.
Hum Factors. 2022 Aug;64(5):852-865. doi: 10.1177/0018720819844845. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
7
Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8
The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 May 19.
9
Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Risk and safety perception on urban and rural roads: Effects of environmental features, driver age and risk sensitivity.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):703-710. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1296956. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of temporal and spatiotemporal cues on detection of dynamic road hazards.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Dec 20;6(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00348-4.
3
A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014.
Front Robot AI. 2018 Apr 17;5:37. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00037. eCollection 2018.
4
Driving Performance and Technology Acceptance Evaluation in Real Traffic of a Smartphone-Based Driver Assistance System.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 28;17(19):7098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197098.
5
Monocular Presentation Attenuates Change Blindness During the Use of Augmented Reality.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01688. eCollection 2019.
6
Time-to-contact estimation errors among older drivers with useful field of view impairments.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt A):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
7
Eye movements and hazard perception in active and passive driving.
Vis cogn. 2015 Jul 3;23(6):736-757. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1079583. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Augmented reality cues to assist older drivers with gap estimation for left-turns.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Oct;71:210-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
9
Designing driver assistance systems with crossmodal signals: multisensory integration rules for saccadic reaction times apply.
PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e92666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092666. eCollection 2014.
10
Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception.
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):643-58. doi: 10.1177/0018720812462029.

本文引用的文献

1
Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception.
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):643-58. doi: 10.1177/0018720812462029.
2
Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load.
Vision Res. 2011 Mar 25;51(6):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
3
Translating cognitive neuroscience to the driver's operational environment: a neuroergonomic approach.
Am J Psychol. 2010 Winter;123(4):391-411. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0391.
4
Attentional capture by motion onsets is modulated by perceptual load.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2096-105. doi: 10.3758/bf03196686.
5
Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 May 26.
6
Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving.
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
7
Perceptual load modulates attentional capture by abrupt onsets.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):404-10. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.404.
9
Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
Hum Factors. 2007 Dec;49(6):1107-14. doi: 10.1518/001872007X249965.
10
Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
Hum Factors. 2007 Oct;49(5):935-49. doi: 10.1518/001872007X230271.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验