Haraji Afshin, Rakhshan Vahid
Associate Professor and Faculty Principal, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Scientific Faculty Member and Lecturer, Department of Dental Anatomy and Morphology, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
Although dry socket (DS) is commonly investigated, many of its risk factors remain highly controversial. In addition, few studies are available to show the preventive effect of chlorhexidine gel on DS. Moreover, multivariable analyses of DS risk factors are scarce, and their interactions have not been assessed previously. Therefore, the simultaneous effect of chlorhexidine gel and 4 DS risk factors and their interactions were analyzed within a multivariable framework.
Using a split-mouth randomized clinical trial design, the investigators enrolled a cohort of patients requiring extraction of 2 mandibular third molars. The primary predictor variable was extraction socket treatment status, classified as experimental or standard. Experimental treatment was the insertion of chlorhexidine gel (0.2%) into the extraction socket. Each patient had 1 third molar randomly selected as the treatment site. The contralateral third molar served as the control socket and was treated in the usual manner. The primary outcome variable was DS status, present or absent, assessed on postoperative day 3. Other study variables were categorized as demographic, smoking, and surgical difficulty according to the Pederson scale. Appropriate bivariate and multiple logistic regression statistics were used to measure the association between risk for DS and chlorhexidine gel use, age, gender, smoking, and surgical difficulty and their interactions (α = 0.05).
The sample consisted of 90 bilateral extraction sockets in 45 patients (24 men; 21 smokers; mean age, 21.1 ± 2.7 yr). Regression analysis showed that when other factors and their interactions were controlled for, chlorhexidine gel application lowered the risk of DS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05; P = .004). Increasing age (OR = 2.9; P = .030) was associated with an increased risk for DS. A similar association existed between increased difficulty level of extraction and DS risk (OR = 3.8; P = .051). The effect of gender was marginally significant (P = .091), whereas smoking did not have a significant influence (P = .4).
Intra-alveolar application of chlorhexidine gel and practicing less traumatic surgeries are advocated, particularly in older patients. Smoking seems unlikely to affect DS frequency. The role of gender is inconclusive.
尽管干槽症(DS)常被研究,但许多危险因素仍极具争议。此外,很少有研究表明洗必泰凝胶对干槽症的预防效果。而且,对干槽症危险因素的多变量分析很少,其相互作用此前也未得到评估。因此,在多变量框架内分析了洗必泰凝胶和4个干槽症危险因素的同时作用及其相互作用。
采用双侧随机临床试验设计,研究人员纳入了一组需要拔除2颗下颌第三磨牙的患者。主要预测变量是拔牙窝治疗状态,分为试验组或标准组。试验性治疗是将洗必泰凝胶(0.2%)插入拔牙窝。每位患者随机选择1颗第三磨牙作为治疗部位。对侧第三磨牙作为对照窝,采用常规方式治疗。主要结局变量是术后第3天评估的干槽症状态,有或无。其他研究变量根据佩德森量表分为人口统计学、吸烟和手术难度。使用适当的双变量和多因素逻辑回归统计来衡量干槽症风险与使用洗必泰凝胶、年龄、性别、吸烟、手术难度及其相互作用之间的关联(α = 0.05)。
样本包括45例患者的90个双侧拔牙窝(24名男性;21名吸烟者;平均年龄21.1±2.7岁)。回归分析表明,在控制其他因素及其相互作用后,应用洗必泰凝胶可降低干槽症风险(比值比[OR]=0.05;P = 0.004)。年龄增加(OR = 2.9;P = 0.030)与干槽症风险增加相关。拔牙难度增加与干槽症风险之间也存在类似关联(OR = 3.8;P = 0.051)。性别的影响微弱显著(P = 0.091),而吸烟没有显著影响(P = 0.4)。
提倡在牙槽内应用洗必泰凝胶并实施创伤较小的手术,尤其是在老年患者中。吸烟似乎不太可能影响干槽症的发生率。性别的作用尚无定论。