Wegbreit Ezra, Suzuki Satoru, Grabowecky Marcia, Kounios John, Beeman Mark
University of Illinois at Chicago.
Northwestern University.
J Probl Solving. 2012;4(2):94-115. doi: 10.7771/1932-6246.1127.
Behavioral and neuroimaging findings indicate that distinct cognitive and neural processes underlie solving problems with sudden insight. Moreover, people with less focused attention sometimes perform better on tests of insight and creative problem solving. However, it remains unclear whether different states of attention, within individuals, influence the likelihood of solving problems with insight or with analysis. In this experiment, participants (N = 40) performed a baseline block of verbal problems, then performed one of two visual tasks, each emphasizing a distinct aspect of visual attention, followed by a second block of verbal problems to assess change in performance. After participants engaged in a center-focused flanker task requiring relatively focused visual attention, they reported solving more verbal problems with analytic processing. In contrast, after participants engaged in a rapid object identification task requiring attention to broad space and weak associations, they reported solving more verbal problems with insight. These results suggest that general attention mechanisms influence both visual attention task performance and verbal problem solving.
行为学和神经影像学研究结果表明,不同的认知和神经过程是通过突然顿悟来解决问题的基础。此外,注意力不太集中的人在顿悟测试和创造性问题解决测试中有时表现得更好。然而,个体内部不同的注意力状态是否会影响通过顿悟或分析来解决问题的可能性,目前尚不清楚。在本实验中,参与者(N = 40)先完成一组语言问题的基线测试,然后进行两项视觉任务中的一项,每项任务都强调视觉注意力的一个不同方面,随后再进行第二组语言问题测试以评估表现的变化。在参与者完成一项需要相对集中视觉注意力的以中心为焦点的侧翼任务后,他们报告说通过分析处理解决了更多语言问题。相比之下,在参与者完成一项需要关注广阔空间和弱关联的快速物体识别任务后,他们报告说通过顿悟解决了更多语言问题。这些结果表明,一般注意力机制会影响视觉注意力任务表现和语言问题解决。