Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 East Erie Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct;18(5):925-931. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0613-5.
Creative problem solving involves search processes, and it is known to be hard to motivate. Reward cues have been found to enhance performance across a range of tasks, even when cues are presented subliminally, without being consciously detected. It is uncertain whether motivational processes, such as reward, can influence problem solving. We tested the effect of supraliminal and subliminal reward on participant performance on problem solving that can be solved by deliberate analysis or by insight. Forty-one participants attempted to solve 100 compound remote associate problems. At the beginning of each problem, a potential reward cue (1 or 25 cents) was displayed, either subliminally (17 ms) or supraliminally (100 ms). Participants earned the displayed reward if they solved the problem correctly. Results showed that the higher subliminal reward increased the percentage of problems solved correctly overall. Second, we explored if subliminal rewards preferentially influenced solutions that were achieved via a sudden insight (mostly processed below awareness) or via a deliberate analysis. Participants solved more problems via insight following high subliminal reward when compared with low subliminal reward, and compared with high supraliminal reward, with no corresponding effect on analytic solving. Striatal dopamine (DA) is thought to influence motivation, reinforce behavior, and facilitate cognition. We speculate that subliminal rewards activate the striatal DA system, enhancing the kinds of automatic integrative processes that lead to more creative strategies for problem solving, without increasing the selectivity of attention, which could impede insight.
创造性问题解决涉及搜索过程,众所周知,这很难激发。奖励线索已被发现可以提高各种任务的表现,即使线索是在潜意识中呈现的,而没有被有意识地检测到。不确定激励过程(如奖励)是否可以影响问题解决。我们测试了超阈限和潜意识奖励对通过深思熟虑的分析或洞察力解决的问题解决能力的影响。41 名参与者试图解决 100 个复合远程联想问题。在每个问题开始时,会显示一个潜在的奖励线索(1 或 25 美分),要么是潜意识(17 毫秒),要么是超阈限(100 毫秒)。如果参与者正确解决了问题,他们就可以获得显示的奖励。结果表明,较高的潜意识奖励总体上增加了正确解决问题的百分比。其次,我们探讨了潜意识奖励是否优先影响通过突然洞察(主要是在意识以下处理)或通过深思熟虑的分析获得的解决方案。与低潜意识奖励相比,参与者在高潜意识奖励下通过洞察解决了更多的问题,与高超阈限奖励相比,也解决了更多的问题,而对分析性解决没有相应的影响。纹状体多巴胺(DA)被认为会影响动机、强化行为并促进认知。我们推测,潜意识奖励激活纹状体 DA 系统,增强了自动整合过程,从而为问题解决提供了更具创造性的策略,而不会增加注意力的选择性,这可能会阻碍洞察力。