• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干旱敏感和耐旱小麦品种根系 ABA 响应的比较定量蛋白质组学分析鉴定了干旱适应性的蛋白质组学特征。

Comparative quantitative proteomics analysis of the ABA response of roots of drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant wheat varieties identifies proteomic signatures of drought adaptability.

机构信息

Donald Danforth Plant Science Center , 975 North Warson Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63132, United States.

出版信息

J Proteome Res. 2014 Mar 7;13(3):1688-701. doi: 10.1021/pr401165b. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1021/pr401165b
PMID:24475748
Abstract

Wheat is one of the most highly cultivated cereals in the world. Like other cultivated crops, wheat production is significantly affected by abiotic stresses such as drought. Multiple wheat varieties suitable for different geographical regions of the world have been developed that are adapted to different environmental conditions; however, the molecular basis of such adaptations remains unknown in most cases. We have compared the quantitative proteomics profile of the roots of two different wheat varieties, Nesser (drought-tolerant) and Opata (drought-sensitive), in the absence and presence of abscisic acid (ABA, as a proxy for drought). A labeling LC-based quantitative proteomics approach using iTRAQ was applied to elucidate the changes in protein abundance levels. Quantitative differences in protein levels were analyzed for the evaluation of inherent differences between the two varieties as well as the overall and variety-specific effect of ABA on the root proteome. This study reveals the most elaborate ABA-responsive root proteome identified to date in wheat. A large number of proteins exhibited inherently different expression levels between Nesser and Opata. Additionally, significantly higher numbers of proteins were ABA-responsive in Nesser roots compared with Opata roots. Furthermore, several proteins showed variety-specific regulation by ABA, suggesting their role in drought adaptation.

摘要

小麦是世界上种植最广泛的谷物之一。与其他栽培作物一样,小麦生产受到干旱等非生物胁迫的显著影响。已经开发出了多种适合世界不同地理区域的小麦品种,它们适应不同的环境条件;然而,在大多数情况下,这种适应的分子基础仍然未知。我们比较了两种不同小麦品种(耐旱的 Nesser 和耐旱的 Opata)在缺乏和存在脱落酸(ABA,作为干旱的代表)时根的定量蛋白质组学图谱。应用 iTRAQ 的基于标记的 LC 定量蛋白质组学方法用于阐明蛋白质丰度水平的变化。分析了蛋白质水平的定量差异,以评估两个品种之间的固有差异以及 ABA 对根蛋白质组的整体和品种特异性影响。这项研究揭示了迄今为止在小麦中鉴定到的最详细的 ABA 响应根蛋白质组。大量蛋白质在 Nesser 和 Opata 之间表现出固有差异的表达水平。此外,与 Opata 根相比,Nesser 根中 ABA 响应的蛋白质数量明显更多。此外,一些蛋白质表现出 ABA 的品种特异性调节,表明它们在干旱适应中的作用。

相似文献

1
Comparative quantitative proteomics analysis of the ABA response of roots of drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant wheat varieties identifies proteomic signatures of drought adaptability.干旱敏感和耐旱小麦品种根系 ABA 响应的比较定量蛋白质组学分析鉴定了干旱适应性的蛋白质组学特征。
J Proteome Res. 2014 Mar 7;13(3):1688-701. doi: 10.1021/pr401165b. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
2
Gel-free/label-free proteomic analysis of wheat shoot in stress tolerant varieties under iron nanoparticles exposure.铁纳米颗粒暴露下耐胁迫小麦品种茎的无凝胶/无标记蛋白质组分析
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Nov;1864(11):1586-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
3
Root Proteomics Reveals the Effects of Wood Vinegar on Wheat Growth and Subsequent Tolerance to Drought Stress.根蛋白组学揭示了木醋酸对小麦生长及随后抗旱能力的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 21;20(4):943. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040943.
4
A rice stress-responsive NAC gene enhances tolerance of transgenic wheat to drought and salt stresses.一个水稻应激响应 NAC 基因增强了转基因小麦对干旱和盐胁迫的耐受性。
Plant Sci. 2013 Apr;203-204:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
5
Alleviation of Drought Stress by Hydrogen Sulfide Is Partially Related to the Abscisic Acid Signaling Pathway in Wheat.硫化氢缓解小麦干旱胁迫与脱落酸信号通路部分相关。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0163082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163082. eCollection 2016.
6
Positive role of a wheat HvABI5 ortholog in abiotic stress response of seedlings.小麦HvABI5直系同源基因在幼苗非生物胁迫响应中的积极作用。
Physiol Plant. 2008 Sep;134(1):74-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01107.x. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
7
Control of abscisic acid catabolism and abscisic acid homeostasis is important for reproductive stage stress tolerance in cereals.控制脱落酸的分解代谢和脱落酸的动态平衡对于谷类作物生殖阶段的抗逆性非常重要。
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jun;156(2):647-62. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176164. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
8
Proteomics reveals the effects of salicylic acid on growth and tolerance to subsequent drought stress in wheat.蛋白质组学揭示了水杨酸对小麦生长和耐受随后干旱胁迫的影响。
J Proteome Res. 2012 Dec 7;11(12):6066-79. doi: 10.1021/pr300728y. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
9
Physiological and comparative proteomic analysis reveals different drought responses in roots and leaves of drought-tolerant wild wheat (Triticum boeoticum).生理和比较蛋白质组学分析揭示了耐旱野生小麦(一粒小麦)根和叶中不同的干旱响应。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 10;10(4):e0121852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121852. eCollection 2015.
10
Shotgun proteomic analysis of long-distance drought signaling in rice roots.水稻根系长距离干旱信号的 shotgun 蛋白质组分析。
J Proteome Res. 2012 Jan 1;11(1):348-58. doi: 10.1021/pr2008779. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome-wide analysis of miRNAs and their target genes in wheat cultivars with different ploidy levels under drought stress.干旱胁迫下不同倍性水平小麦品种中miRNA及其靶基因的全基因组分析
Planta. 2025 Jul 1;262(2):38. doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04757-3.
2
Utilizing Multi-Omics Analysis to Elucidate the Molecular Mechanisms of Oat Responses to Drought Stress.利用多组学分析阐明燕麦对干旱胁迫响应的分子机制。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;14(5):792. doi: 10.3390/plants14050792.
3
Exogenous abscisic acid treatment regulates protein secretion in sorghum cell suspension cultures.
外源脱落酸处理调节高粱悬浮细胞培养中的蛋白质分泌。
Plant Signal Behav. 2023 Dec 31;18(1):2291618. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2291618. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Functional Meta-Analysis of the Proteomic Responses of Arabidopsis Seedlings to the Spaceflight Environment Reveals Multi-Dimensional Sources of Variability across Spaceflight Experiments.功能荟萃分析揭示了拟南芥幼苗对空间环境的蛋白质组响应的多维变异性来源,该分析基于对多个空间飞行实验的研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 22;24(19):14425. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914425.
5
Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.小麦组学:进展与机遇
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;12(3):426. doi: 10.3390/plants12030426.
6
Proteomic responses of two spring wheat cultivars to the combined water deficit and aphid () treatments.两个春小麦品种对水分亏缺和蚜虫联合处理的蛋白质组学响应。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Nov 14;13:1005755. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1005755. eCollection 2022.
7
Conventional and Omics Approaches for Understanding the Abiotic Stress Response in Cereal Crops-An Updated Overview.用于理解谷类作物非生物胁迫响应的传统方法和组学方法——最新综述
Plants (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;11(21):2852. doi: 10.3390/plants11212852.
8
Wheat Proteomics for Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Root System Architecture: Current Status and Future Prospects.用于非生物胁迫耐受性和根系结构的小麦蛋白质组学:现状与未来展望
Proteomes. 2022 May 22;10(2):17. doi: 10.3390/proteomes10020017.
9
The impact of noise and missing fragmentation cleavages on peptide identification algorithms.噪声和缺失片段裂解对肽段鉴定算法的影响。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Mar 19;20:1402-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.008. eCollection 2022.
10
iTRAQ-Based Proteomics Analysis of Response to Leaves Treated with the Plant Phytotoxin Thaxtomin A.基于 iTRAQ 的叶片响应植物毒素独脚金素 A 的蛋白质组学分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 7;22(21):12036. doi: 10.3390/ijms222112036.